Found Deceased UK - Nicola Bulley Last Seen Walking Dog Near River - St Michaels on Wyre (Lancashire) #11

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
"Life can turn on a sixpence as they say"...

I was just sitting here contemplating a nice beer and thinking things triggered by comments here and the huge amount of speculation about the event.
I was thinking given that PA's working day was not going to start for a few hours (US time) and that NB had a work meeting scheduled for 9.00, and knowing they share the school run and dog walking, it's a real shame that they didn't swap and have PA take the girls to school that day to give Nicola a bit more time before 9.00.

If he had, life for so many people would be continuing normally, and we all would have been far more constructively employed for the last 10 days or so.

Hardly bears thinking about.
 
  • #162
DBM glitchy site duplicate post
 
  • #163
His comments are in quote marks. That, regardless of the source, indicates that the comments attributed to him are his own words, verbatim. Even the Sun is subject to good journalistic practice when it comes to direct quotes.
Awful publication. Indefensible.
 
  • #164
DBM
 
  • #165
Is the company she works for one single national company which employ’s people (employed or self employed) or is it a company which has people in different areas who have taken on a franchise? I expect the Police will have looked into the nature of the Teams meeting and the content as to whether it was training, company update, meeting targets etc. I know someone who logged in to a Skype meeting a few years ago with the company they worked for (different line of work completely) and the meeting was to tell the employees that they were having to make redundancies.
 
  • #166
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.

I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
 
  • #167
  • #168
Why?

Surely PA would know, and if it wasn't NB then it wouldn't have been released.
Destroyer said:
I still have my doubts this was Nicola on the Ring Doorbell footage
View attachment 402181

I did find it odd that it was actually the family friend that released the CCTV not the police. It definitely feels like the family and friends are doing their own thing whilst police concentrate on their theories. Jmo.
 
  • #169
Is it just me (it may well be), or has the media coverage/progression dramatically reduced today?

Concerns me that there may be some development that is subject to embargo.
 
  • #170
Is it just me (it may well be), or has the media coverage/progression dramatically reduced today?

Concerns me that there may be some development that is subject to embargo.
Yes it has been very quiet. IMO.
 
  • #171
Just because it’s been bugging me for a while on a few peoples posts. Can’t we just presume a post is in your opinion rather than the need for IMO, JMO, MOO, it’s excessive.

It’s there to safeguard the poster and the forum itself. Some people do occasionally post about a case definitively, which we can’t do when we’re discussing aspects of it that aren’t concrete or confirmed.

You’d probably be grateful if someone involved in a case saw your post and didn’t have to accept what you said as being a definitive view of something because you’ve stated it was your opinion only, as that only leads to potential trouble and legality issues.
 
  • #172
Has anyone seen any footage of what the sonar man is looking at while scanning the river bed? It is such good equipment and so expensive that one assumes there would be some footage just to give us examples of what the display is like.

Anyone? I mean actual footage not just a few seconds in a news report.
Yes it was shown on Channel 5 on Friday evening
 
  • #173
Is it just me (it may well be), or has the media coverage/progression dramatically reduced today?

Concerns me that there may be some development that is subject to embargo.
Not sure - she is the front page of every national paper and I’ve seen a number of articles linked.
 
  • #174
<modsnip - quoted post was removed>
definately NB in the home CCTV

1676138760579.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #175
Certainly the apparent roof line doesn't look right for a van
This is a better bet at Rowanwater as its on same side of river as NB walked and near to last place she was seen. Access to Garstang Road
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-02-11 at 18.02.03.png
    Screenshot 2023-02-11 at 18.02.03.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 38
  • #176
Yes it was shown on Channel 5 on Friday evening
Ok. I don't have telly and no subscriptions is there a YouTube video ? I would have thought someone with such a wonderful machine would be getting as much content out there as possible.
 
  • #177
  • #178
Not sure - she is the front page of every national paper and I’ve seen a number of articles linked.
Halfway down the Daily Mail online. A sign of things to come unless there’s a huge update soon.
 
  • #179
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.

I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
The first interaction was with a regular dogwalker ,she said they had a short conversation .
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.

I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
The first interaction was with a regular dogwalker who sad
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.

I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
Muxt complying with your request to sat the first too interact was a regular who knew Nicola so. Her testimony
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.

I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
The first interaction was with a regular . I doubt she would have mistaken who she was ta
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.
I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
I doubt very much the lady she had the interaction with Would mistake.
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.

I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
The lady who met her would not have. Mistaken her identity. She knew her
 
  • #180
Just running a wild thought over in my head and sharing. I'm not saying this is what happened, I'm just throwing what little we know up in the air and seeing how it falls.

If we suspend our notions of what is likely for one moment, and accept that someone other than NB could operate her phone then it becomes only an assumption that she herself clicked on the phone link for the teams meeting (camera and audio off). It is possible to send a text on someone else's phone which appears to be from them if they have access to it. The only witness sightings were from a distance (dogs interacted but did they interact?), then the last physical interaction with NB for definite would be dropping the kids off at the school as the kids and teachers/other parents could not be mistaken. Could it be that it was someone other than NB in the field but dressed up in the same clothes, of the same size, same hair, with local knowledge, who would be able to control the dog as they had walked it before? The bench scene then being staged. Whatever happened to NB having happened immediately after the school drop.

Please do tell me if there are obvious holes in this so that I can put it in the discarded list.

I'm still leaning towards a possible abduction, having abandoned the river as a theory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
106
Guests online
2,635
Total visitors
2,741

Forum statistics

Threads
632,680
Messages
18,630,378
Members
243,248
Latest member
nonameneeded777
Back
Top