- Joined
- Nov 23, 2020
- Messages
- 3,759
- Reaction score
- 21,841
Sorry, but with the very greatest respect, these are the writings of someone who's looking for innocence, as opposed to someone following the evidence.If all 257 pages referred to the children she’s accused of murdering then I’d agree that’s pretty damning. But if they’re just all the case records of the children under her care then I’d say it’s less so. I’m convinced she’s neurodivergent and keeping records is something someone on the spectrum (so to speak) would do quite fastidiously. They may have been labelled “keep” so that they didn’t accidentally get chucked away and end up being discovered - she’d know she wasn’t meant to take them but may have thought taking them for her own records/reflection/learning was less bad.
Similarly with the asterisks in her diary - were they ONLY on days the victims died, or were they on days other babies died too? It’s never made clear.
I hate how her handwritten notes have been used as evidence of her guilt. They’re clearly the ramblings of a mentally unwell person and cherry picking parts of sentences to fit a narrative is disgusting imo.
There was eight months of it which was followed by nearly a month of jury deliberations. Taking individual pieces and arguing how they aren't incriminating is to miss the whole point and has been done at MASSIVE length on for years!
She's guilty.
She did it.
Full stop!