Search results

As has been previously discussed, kids don't always act the same with both parents, and it was ER who gave a glowing report, not MR. Some of the things MR said, like "who knows what goes through a 13 year old's head?" left me with the impression he was seeing some of that so-called typical...

I think you misunderstood, or else I did? I don't think the question is why wouldn't MR admit to it being Dylan's pole if it wasn't, I think the question is, why wouldn't MR have been able to say "No, that is NOT Dylan's pole" when it was found. Hope that helps.

I haven't heard MR deny that Cory had been at MR's house. I see no reason to assume otherwise.

BBM. I disagree that there has been omission by the family. I've posted this link before to an interview from July 26th, in which Heather and Drew admit it was entirely possible that Elizabeth was biking farther than they knew. Seems to me we've had family confirmation that the possibility...

The link leads to a post report.

Possible, but seems so unlikely. I have a hard time picturing two boys who just met an hour or two ago, deciding to take off together. Sorry, I am still a newb. I guess I don't know what a recruiter is, exactly? Are there a lot of missing kids who have been recruited? Off the top of my head...

And, jumping off your post, why wouldn't the mail carrier have recognized the other boy? I also can't quite figure how it came to be that she spoke with MR the next day, since his po box is on the road?

Thank you for finding this!!! I feel like my sanity has been restored. I happened to halfway catch this interview when it was televised, before I was familiar with the case. Once I started following along here, I could never find any hint of it, anywhere, and the subsequent interviews I saw...

Well, that was taken out of "text". :floorlaugh: I believe Supermom was offering the perspective of "everyone" who thinks MR is guilty, and was not actually saying "everyone thinks he is guilty". If you read the entire post, particularly her last sentence, it's seems very obvious.

Yes, I tend to think it is another attempt to undermine Elaine as a parent.

I am not stuck on any particular theory, but there is one scenario (of many) that runs through my mind, involving MR and a father's rights type group, that would allow him to say "I have nothing to do with this" and almost be truthful. Could be wishful thinking on my part, because it would...

What makes you think LE didn't do that. As far as I know, we don't really have many details concerning either call or report, unless you have a link to show otherwise?

And, as if that is not enough, her mother's illness, added to that. My heart just aches for her.

The "Hug Counter" made my day! Thanks for sharing this wonderful story.

I feel like I am speaking out of turn, since I didn't follow Tammy's case, but I was also curious about that. I read an article that said her body was found by a fisherman in a river...

BBM. I doubt that. I didn't see ER rush in and take up that "PI" on his offer of free help just because MR did.

Parental rights are considered more important than child safety. moo.

Thank you, and SCMAE, too. I realized my mistake just after I submitted my post-I tried to correct it via an edit, but you all are way too fast for me. : ) ETA-Found my earbuds and the correct spot, and I totally hear it now.

Sorry-- I actually wish I heard what the rest of you did, because it would give me a tinge of hope for resolution, but, what I heard was "Boy, I just struggle with this whole thing". ETA-- Sorry! I just re read a post, and I think I was mistaken in assuming you all meant the last thing MR says...

Yes, I know, thanks. I was responding to a comment that implied calling a divorce lawyer at such a time would be hinky.