Search results

When you encounter a bug that freaks you out, why not just vacuum it up?

Sorry, but at that point she was no longer "stalking him". Everything else you wrote makes sense. :) Nurmi's objections were very objectionable. I would have loved to hear JM object to every sentence Nurmi uttered: "Objection ... B.S.!"

Reality. This case has resurrected repressed memories as a child of visiting a pig farm and watching the selection of a pig being separated from the rest of the pigs, hoisted up and slaughtered (neck wound). I won't go into the gruesome details, but it involved the sounds, sights, and horror of...

I think that when the Yreka cops nabbed Jodi at grandma's home with the rental car packed with her "kill kit" (i.e., box of books secreting a couple of knives, and her brand new 9 mm handgun taped inside by the engine), that they may have stopped a potential serial killer after her first trophy...

This is the story of the reality show contestant who murdered his wife. I wasn't a follower of these sorts of cases back then, as I am now.

Is that just a fancy way of calling people "two-faced"? ;) It is interesting how the very same person (Jodi or Travis) can be either vilified or glorified, depending on the viewer's perspective. :fence:

Det. Melendez said "Greenwich" the same way during the Rebuttal direct when talking about the time info embedded in the digital photos. Maybe that's the way people say it in AZ?

So, if both of those are from "Day 1", then Willmott made a wardrobe change between videos?

I would prefer to see a reenactment using a body cast made up of ballistics gel with a skeleton and organs and "blood" (head & torso) like they use in Spike TV's "Deadliest Warrior" or Discovery Channel's "Mythbusters" in order to get a realistic representation of the force and time required to...

Seriously?!! Trying to translate acronym after acronym really slows down the reading process on these forums, and then you throw in a new one (with no previous reference) that needs more research and time to figure out. :banghead:

I believe that the jury selection process weeds out the crazies.

Okay, you are obviously very MADD at Garry Scarff, but who is he and what does he have to do with this trial? Daniel Gibb was juror #8.

Since you were listing things, there was also the flipped/removed license plates on the rental car.

"JCL"??? I just wasted time trying to look that up, but I have no idea what you are trying to say. :confused:

Since it was YOUR idea, I vote for YOU to do it! :seeya:

I think that he was let go because he told the arresting officer that he was a juror in the Arias trial, and he was not supposed to talk about the trial according to the judge's admonishment to all of the jurors.

I suppose there is a law against the sale of counterfeit merchandise. Donovan and Jodi could also be liable for copyright infringement if the true authors of the infringing artworks wanted to sue Donovan and Jodi.

Gus was trying to sensationalize his story by misrepresenting the facts. He told Jean Casarez that Jodi called him on the night of the murder. It actually took place at 5:30 pm on June 4, 2008. Gus said he got the call at about 3:30 am on June 4, which precedes the murder. Jodi actually...

Now that post makes sense ... it needed both links to put things into context! So Jodi lies about her artwork too? She's a plagiarist? How dare she! Note: Even though the original art is on a "free image" site, there is usually a copyright stipulation that, although you can "use" the...

:confused: I don't get it. The link takes you to a nice piece of artwork. :confused: