ElizaAvalon
FBI Agent in the next life
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2006
- Messages
- 2,497
- Reaction score
- 91
They left his car there? That's news to me. I thought they were processing it? How can they process it in place?
They left his car there? That's news to me. I thought they were processing it? How can they process it in place?
It doesn't say it's Rob's car. It says a red car owned by an electrician.They left his car there? That's news to me. I thought they were processing it? How can they process it in place?
Why would his car still be at the train station?
Why not towed home? Or to the impound lot?
Maybe they are leaving it there to see who might try to come and get it?
It doesn't say it's Rob's car. It says a red car owned by an electrician.
Curious statement though. Maybe it will be cleared up?
It's not his car. IM posted on FB there was a red car owned by an electrician abandoned at the train station. She saw it at the train station yesterday during latest search. Goes to show there are details that have not been released. How would she know it was abandoned and who owns it if it wasn't investigated.
It's not his car. IM posted on FB there was a red car owned by an electrician abandoned at the train station. She saw it at the train station yesterday during latest search. Goes to show there are details that have not been released. How would she know it was abandoned and who owns it if it wasn't investigated.
Leaving the metal proceeds in the garage was strange. Why not leave it in your pocket or in hidden the car (trunk?). It was probably not that much. Maybe it was a statement to leave it behind?
Was it verified he left the money in the garage?
NCNY later retracted this. The money found in the garage was thought to NOT come from the proceeds of the scrap yard transaction.
There is a receipt and witnesses who say there was a minimal transaction. He either had the money on his person when he went missing or perhaps he it was stolen from him or he gave the money to someone.
There is a receipt and witnesses who say there was a minimal transaction. He either had the money on his person when he went missing or perhaps he it was stolen from him or he gave the money to someone.
Was that car (red car second) abandoned or is there a maintenance issue????
Maybe IM doesn't have RM's car (THE CAR) is b/c the title is in his name? SLightly OT--I had to pay the registration renewal last month for one of our cars-had to go to DMV-blahblahblah. I was not permitted to pay it b/c the car is in Mr C's name despite me being his wife. Maybe THE CAR cannot be released to her??
Did we ever get clarification on what "minimal" means????
I would think its the least amount that does not require ID. Or maybe a daily transaction that a private citizen can make???
Did we ever get clarification on what "minimal" means????
I would think its the least amount that does not require ID. Or maybe a daily transaction that a private citizen can make???