Judges are always made aware when both sides are trying to plea the case out. It was obvious that this Judge was also aware of negotiations.
All the DA had to do is stand up in court right then and there and say "there will be no plea negotiation in this case your Honor, lets move along" but he didn't and he had every opportunity to do so.
I find that highly unlikely. No plea deal is even being discussed for any of the other players. I highly doubt they would consider giving one to the very person they think was involved in Haleigh's disappearance.
IMO
Actually Judges are NOT always made aware of negotiations for plea bargains. Judges have no responsibilities or duties in regards to plea bargains until they are finalized. Judge only need to know things that fall under their responsibilities/duties. Therefore, Judges are not made aware of plea negotation unless they need to know. Judges only need to know aabout negotiations for plea bargains for the purposes of the courtroom calendars.
In Ron's case, the reason the Judge made that comment was to get confirmation of the possibility of a plea bargain. The Judge would want to know to set the upcoming dates in Ron's case as well as scheduling his courtroom calendar.
First, the Judge would discuss the calendaring of the upcoming dates in Ron's case. Is the plea date of July 9 sufficient time or does the DA want him to set it further out? Same thing with the trial date.
Second, the Courtroom calendars are a balancing act. The courtroom never wants to be dark. So they have to schedule multiple trials/hearings at the same time. If Ron was most likely pleading and not going to trial, the Judge's clerk would make a notation so that they could schedule other cases accordingly.
IMO, the fact that the DA NEVER confirmed with the Judge that a plea is in negotiation says it is not. Ron's attorney wants to negotiate but the DA is still waiting for Ron to give them something they want. They don't need Ron to testify in the drug cases so that would not be something they want.
IMO, the fact that Ron does not have a plea deal in the drug cases is a sign that Ron is being looked at in Haleigh's case. If Ron had an ironclad alibi at work, they would be negotiating a plea. Because they would know Ron had nothing to offer them in Haleigh's case. If the defendant has nothing to offer and is willing to take a plea, they are not going to spend all that time and money to take him to trial.
LE's comments about being satisfied with Ron's work hours could mean just that. If Ron's work hours were 5 pm to 3 am, LE would be satisfied with Ron's work hours. If Ron's work hours are 3:30 pm to midnight, LE would be satisfied with Ron's work hours. However, nowhere in that statement does it say that LE are satisfied that Ron was working his scheduled work hours. Nowhere does it say that Ron was at work and has an ironclad allibi.
LE wants to know what Misty was doing between 10 pm and 2 am. That does not mean that LE believes something happened to Haleigh during those hours and Ron was at work so he is ruled out. It could also be that LE has evidence of Misty's whereabouts up to 10 pm and nothing after 10 pm.
IMO, if Ron's work was an ironclad alibi, LE would have told us. IMO, PDM NEVER releasing Ron's work hour shift and threatening any employees who talk to the press says that something is wrong with those hours. IMO, that no employees have come out anonymously says that there are questions. Questions mean a higher risk of getting caught if you speak out anonymously. The employer would have a better chance of figuring out by the answers who is talking.