This is Tony's answer to the question which side's attorneys would be releasing this upcoming revelation.
If he really does know about something that is about to be released that truly will be a surprise it is something that ALL attorneys (defense and prosecution) know about.
Well, as usual lately, I appear to be a day late and a dollah short. I was actually reading this thread to another WS poster (who has been hijacked into cyberspace by an evil game called Farmville - which leads to Farm Town and My Farm and My Tropical Island and My Fishtank and all kinds of other frightening permutations, which I suspect is an alien plot similar to Hulu commercials - don't get me started, but people are starting to disappear and I'm getting ready to get an intervention SWAT team together for some family members) when TP decided to leave. I had a question that I really wanted to ask.
Personally, I think TP offered us just as much info by what he did not or refused to answer as in what he did. Maybe he thought we were "intelligent and mature" enough to read between the lines, speculate, and simply sleuth out answers since we seem to like puzzles. (I particularly enjoyed his comment about how
thorough the FBI has been). He gave us the opinions he formed during his time in FL but he did not say how they may have changed since then.
I have great sympathy for how circumspect and diplomatic he needs to be in order to legally be above the fracas right now. I think he enjoys our inquiring little minds and has done all he can do within the parameters he can work within to be as honest and forthright as possible. I think he trusts us to put the pieces together, even though he cannot be completely transparent perhaps. We are all just tired of waiting for the truth and our "frushtration" is showing. I hope he can see through the antsy-ness and realize we are pretty harmless if a bit overzealous and impatient sometimes.
His indication that an important piece of info is coming along - and the fact that it may be known on both sides of the case, makes me think something about how this case is being funded - or something else along those lines - might be coming up soon - and may also be why he feels it is either unnecessary or inopportune to press for the legality of the documents he and the rest of the crew signed that are obviously at odds with the description that JB gave. Years ago I was a FL notary and the fine was $3K per signature if not notarized correctly and potential jail time. It's not taken lightly. I also think that if JB had cobbled together documents and misrepresented the authenticity of a legal contract, that could seriously affect an attorney's license to practice. If this matter seems secondary or moot at this point, I could only speculate that something even worse about the defense and their actions is coming down the pike. That is something that both sides would know about.
I also think it's interesting that info came out today that LDB and Morgan are not sitting idly by while the defense makes all kinds of insane claims in front of courtroom cameras without having to back them up with actual discovery instead of inflammatory rhetoric.
What I was most curious to ask - and will offer it for speculation for others here or on another thread is, why did JB insist on all that insane level of control and secrecy and monitoring for KC's first bond by the Padillas, and then we never heard anything about any type of home security whatsoever IIRC, the second time she was bonded out by JB's friends McDonald and whomever else? We have a wealth of information from the impressions that TM, RD, LP and TP got during those first nine days, but she spent much longer out on bail the second time - over a month - before she was finally indicted.
If she was observed by TMc being allowed to play on JB's computer in his office - who was even watching to see what she was doing at home during her second period of house arrest? Didn't I hear once that LA and CA bragged they slipped out the back way one night and missed all the protestors, etc?
If she was allowed to have Annie there - and was talking to Dakota or others during that second bonding - why did JB suddenly relax his rules when he was so strict with the Padilla team? That really, really bugs me for some reason. I am even more curious about what went down then because it is so clouded in secrecy.
Thanks, Tony, for being as forthright and open as you can be and still maintain your professionalism. We appreciate it more than you know and I hope you can forgive our anxiety, or not take it personally - it's been over a year and there are just so many questions left unanswered or delayed. We are all just hoping for justice for Caylee and for the innocent people that have not only been played, but actually implicated in this horrific affair.