2011.06.29 TRIAL Day Thirty-one (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
SO WHAT IF LA DID SNEAK INTO HER ROOM? SO WHAT??? It doesn't justify chloroforming your child and throwing her into a swamp.

Bingo!!!
This trial could have been finished last week. The jury could have been deliberating by now...........JB is having a blast dragging this thing on, he loves frustrating people......
 
6 months ago CA believed Caylee was still alive, and testified truthfully.
 
Relevance?

Well... I think it's relevant to the case, Judge.

Sustained!
 
Wut wut wut?!!? :waitasec::confused:

I'm utterly confused. Why would they ask a defendant if she "agrees" to a mistrial? Isn't it pretty much a given that she'll be happy with a mistrial?

Is it possible that this serpent's tooth of a child will get to slither back home when this is over?
 
JB needs to stop asking others about the sexual abuse, it needs to come from ICA herself.
 
"I think it's relevant to the case in chief judge."

"Objection sustained."

LOL
 
He is trying to make her look looney for the next witness, JG, so that no one will believe anything she says.
 
WOW! JB asking her why she had Caylee cremated, but believed she was still alive 6 months ago.
 
JB asking if CA testified truthfully about if she believed Caylee was alive CA says yes. JB goes into the memorial of Jan of 2009 CA corrects him says it was Feb 2009 JB goes into her having Caylee remains cremated.

JB keeps asking SA keeps objecting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
483
Total visitors
613

Forum statistics

Threads
626,488
Messages
18,527,065
Members
241,062
Latest member
Jemima16
Back
Top