JB is not doing a good job criticizing these experts. Too many different names, all intermingled together, with no concise summary of what his problem with each witness.
He should have taken each individually, and done a consise summary of the testimony and his critique and then moved on to the next one. I am finding his discussion confusing. Further it has been a long day for the jury, he is making it so that you really have to be on top of it to even follow what he is saying,
Unlike JA, he is making it so that you have to expend effort to get what he is saying,