For sure there's always that risk. I could absolutely see someone with bad intentions doing just that. Maybe you can donate and see if there is some disclaimer that pops up when you do?
Since he's not RA's atty, there is no client, correct?
An oldie moldy article that doesn't appear to be in the archives of their county council meetings, nor on Debbie Lowe's utube. I heard it got pretty heated.
County Council not pleased with Prosecutor’s secretary position change - Carroll County Comet
The Carroll County Council met in regular session March 16 with a full agenda. It got even fuller at what was expected to be the end of the meeting. Recorder Penny Titus approached the Council after all other business had concluded. She informed council members that the person who was supposed...www.carrollcountycomet.com
www.carrollcountycomet.com
You can't count me in your majority of people who think otherwise. I've been screaming that RA is entitled to a qualified defense absolutely. R&B are just not qualified to represent him at this point IMO.
DH's clients are R&B, who are the attorneys of record for RA. How could that not lead to potential ethical issues? It should have been set up by an independent non biased person. IMO
Yes, they're the same two ex parte motion as filed on 4/8 except it seems like the Defense has deleted what in particular they are requesting. Along with their notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information Request, which wasn't filed ex parte. Still have no idea what that might be, would that become public information then?
Source?
RSABBM
There is no indication the 2 orders are the same one.
| 04/08/2024 | Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information from Public Access Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Stamp: 04/08/2024 |
| 04/08/2024 | Motion Filed Ex Parte Motion to Reconsider Funds for Tech Experts and also Funds for Administrative Assistants Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Stamp: 04/08/2024 |
| 04/08/2024 | Motion Filed Proposed Order on Ex Parte Motion to Reconsider Funds for Tech Experts and also Funds for Administrative Assistants Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Stamp: 04/08/2024 |
| 04/09/2024 | Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information from Public Access Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Stamp: 04/09/2024 |
| 04/09/2024 | Motion Filed Ex Parte Motion Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Stamp: 04/09/2024 |
| 04/09/2024 | Motion Filed Ex Parte Order Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Stamp: 04/09/2024 |
And I have no doubt he’ll read them! He just won’t repeat the stupid mistake he made last time. Still laughing at that one. Good grief!
So by this language they can use the funds to plan travel for themselves and friend and family to the Four Seasons and have professional massages. Have a wine tasting done by an expert sommelier and fly by private jet and enjoy fat steak dinners. JMO
They look like exact duplicates to me excluding the descriptors on the ex parte motions, but it could be possible that they have another three exactly filed the same way the very next day. Anything is possible here I've learned.
I think DH's representation of B&R is limited.
If the P knowingly usurped the rules and violated the order of the Court, he should have to face the consequences as well. I don't pick sides as to whom the rules apply, they should apply to all involved.Someone asked previously how the P came into possession of the ex parte filings. This explanation is a footnote from the Motion for Parity in Resources. We don't know how he came into possession and no one was talking at the date of this filing: 3/17/2024 12:46 PM
Pages 8 & 9
1 Despite filing the motion ex parte and clearly labeling the motion as such in bold
lettering at the top, someone has shared those ex parte pleadings with the State. The State
chose to review them in detail, and refer to one of the motions at length in a publicly filed
pleading—letting the whole world know what should have been protected information.
Attorney Rozzi alerted this Court and the State by email of the breach of confidentiality,
requesting information as to how it occurred and whether it could be remedied. To date,
counsel has not received a response from the Court, nor the Stat, evidencing some attempt
by either to remedy the problem.
If the P knowingly usurped the rules and violated the order of the Court, he should have to face the consequences as well. I don't pick sides as to whom the rules apply, they should apply to all involved.
What I find a strange coincidence (of the soooo many in this case) is that the P did not hide the fact he got the D's request because he in turn filed a Motion for Request for Health Records on Defendant Allen the next day and even referred to the document from the defense in his Motion. How does that make any sense that he somehow knowingly broke the rules, snuck a peek and then decided tell on himself by admitting all of that in his Motion?
MOO
DH's representation of R&B goes back to Oct and is still in full motion today, especially in regards to the contempt charges.
Well, if NMcL is that inexperienced then he shouldn't be practicing law IMO, especially in high profile double homicide case. I admit I don't know anything about NMcL. I think I'll go down the rabbit hole and check it out.
