- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 29,150
- Reaction score
- 684,714
Yes, one certainly does seem more apparent to be correct than the other, as the evidence supports it.Option A: RA wasn’t using his phone like he said! He lied!
Or Option B: RA wasn’t there like he said!
Hmmmm. One seems more apparent to be correct than the other.
He said he was there, putting himself there at the perfect time to commit the murders (sadly wearing the same clothes as BG). This was verified by a video capturing his car (almost certainly his), his own statements, and the verification from a particular group of witnesses (whose timeline jibed perfectly with his).
He's just walking along, with his head buried in his phone looking at stock quotes, as one does when going to watch fish (I've started using this one when my friends ask what I'm doing).
If anyone believes that, then God bless. But we don't have to make a call there. There is no evidence his phone puts him there that day. That indicates that his phone wasn't on his person, or just wasn't on. There was no looking at stock quotes. There was no watching fish. He was hunting, and didn't want police hunting him.
So it's option A.