- Joined
- Apr 24, 2025
- Messages
- 1,765
- Reaction score
- 22,641
oooh exciting!
I don't see how it helps the defense that she was normal and calm because it tends to show that she was not 'unwell', like they are trying to show. She told people she was unwell at that time but it doesn't really look like it here, nor did she seem unwell when the ambulance transferred her to the other hospital. Nor while she was in the hospital.Yes, i agree @katydid23 . Perhaps that is the main reason the prosecution were showing it - to show the stark differences.
Could Erin being seen to act quite normal and calm, as you say, play into the defence's hand? We'll never know.
JMO
The title of the first slide is "What is a computer?".
I respectfully disagree. When I was on a murder jury, very little discussion took place until after both sides summed up and the judge gives you his/her lengthy instructions. Believe me, once in the jury room, I believe they would be talking about anything other than mushroom varieties and phone pings.This pause without the jury is great. The jury will currently be in the jury room with nothing to do but to debate points to date. Most days, they only have short recesses to do this, as they are let out for lunch to do what they want.
Already, there will be some "friendships" or natural alignment between some people, yet usually only with those seated close to you - or, if someone is presenting information and debate in a way that resonates with some other jurors. In the jury room, you sit in the same seat as your first day, around a boardroom type table, every day. The only one that is moved on day one is the elected jury chair.
This extended break and lock-in will naturally bring about greater conversation than they have had the opportunity to do thus far.
When you don't know your audience's baseline knowledge, you start at the beginning, I guess?
Just quietly, I think we are in for another long day.
When you don't know your audience's baseline knowledge, you start at the beginning, I guess?
"What is software?" Justice Beale asks.
"It is an application or program we use to examine or interpret the data," Mr Fox Henry replies.
Exactly, good question.She knew she foraged for mushrooms. Even if we say she only accidentally picked Death Cap mushrooms, and she felt even the tiniest real bit sick, with her knowledge of mushrooms, good think she'd tear away to an ER in case she accidentally poisoned herself -- and while tearing away to an ER using BOTH of her cell phones to warn her guests.
Instead she was buying a sammich at the 5 star gastaurant. In her cream pants.
How could she be so sure her liver wasn't shutting down?
JMO
Programs used to recover data outlined
By Kristian Silva
Mr Fox-Henry takes the jury through some more of the basics of digital forensic work.
The data is then provided in a non-editable form to police investigators, he says.
We move onto digital forensics for phones. He says a similar process is followed to extract data.
Two software programs are used to recover data: Cellebrite from phones and Magnet Axiom for computers.
I agree. Juries are told that they are not to discuss the case with anyone, even their fellow jurors, until the judge has given instructions and deliberations begin. They shouldn't even be forming an opinion until all the evidence has been presented.I respectfully disagree. When I was on a murder jury, very little discussion took place until after both sides summed up and the judge gives you his/her lengthy instructions. Believe me, once in the jury room, I believe they would be talking about anything other than mushroom varieties and phone pings.
I don't see how it helps the defense that she was normal and calm because it tends to show that she was not 'unwell', like they are trying to show. She told people she was unwell at that time but it doesn't really look like it here, nor did she seem unwell when the ambulance transferred her to the other hospital. Nor while she was in the hospital.
The 4 other victims were sliding into comas and she was perfectly fine.
So I am not sure this clip helps the defense too much. Buying sandwiches at a gas station are not indicative of someone who fears they have food poisoning already, imo.
She bought two sandwiches and some sour candy, I believe. A tomato and cheese sandwich but I don't remember the other kind.Did she buy anything? I can’t recall. Might have been perusing to appear to enter the service station to purchase rather than just use the bathroom. Generally sign posted for ‘customers only’.
I do know that salty biscuits or chips work well if your desperate to settle your stomach outside the house (yes, gas station food) but leaving the house for a long journey plus wearing white pants does seem odd. It was 24+ hrs after lunch, her symptoms might have settled whereas her guests were deteriorating. I realise that these points all suggest she was perfectly fine and free of toxins but I don’t think every action screams guilt either.
We don't know that the food was for her.I don't see how it helps the defense that she was normal and calm because it tends to show that she was not 'unwell', like they are trying to show. She told people she was unwell at that time but it doesn't really look like it here, nor did she seem unwell when the ambulance transferred her to the other hospital. Nor while she was in the hospital.
The 4 other victims were sliding into comas and she was perfectly fine.
So I am not sure this clip helps the defense too much. Buying sandwiches at a gas station are not indicative of someone who fears they have food poisoning already, imo.
Yes, it is...It sounds like on the way they bought:
On the journey, she stopped at a BP service station in Caldermeade, where Ms Patterson purchased sour confectionery, a ham, cheese and tomato sandwich and a sweet chilli chicken wrap, after stepping into the bathroom for 9 seconds.
On the way back they got the dimsims, coffee, etc.
A lot of food for a sick person.
I just want to know what data they foundDigital forensic 'artefacts' explained
By Judd Boaz
Mr Fox-Henry says police can search for files of interest by looking for keywords, or narrowing down activity over a period of time.
He says the individual segments of data are known in the digital forensic's space as "artefacts".
The court hears that files, folders and data such as internet searches are considered artefacts, and can be copied and analysed by recovery software.
The software will generate information about artefacts, such as when it was created or last accessed.
“Is that a convenient time?” Justice Beale interjects, calling the lunch break.
Proceedings will continue at 2.15pm.
Yes, it is...![]()
To the wayside 'doughnut stop' at Koo Wee Rup where Erin Patterson and her children stopped for dim sims, a hot dog and coffee on a trip to the Tyabb airport the day after the fateful lunch…I also recall mention of a "donut van" stop?