D
Sounds like she's blaming the mystery Asian grocer and that she mixed up the ones she foraged with the ones she supposedly bought there.
So what is her defense of how the Death Caps made there way into the BW that she cooked and served?
For me and my opinion only, the fact that she didn't rush her kids to the hospital after learning that everyone at that lunch was hospitalized and in grave condition indicates her guilt more than anything else.Panic behavior is usually a sign of guilt- like fleeing a scene, not crying at a funeral...At minimum she feared being charged with manslaughter. But I think the alleged poisonings were intentional and she still held rage at Simon and his family.
I think it’s more likely emotional disregulation.Some people would defined her as a 'polymath'.
Nothing wrong with lifelong learning in diverse areas unless she's costing others somehow or it causes a problem in and of itself.
If anything negative, it could be a symptom of a workaholic or an over-active compulsive mind that can't sit still and find ease and relaxation. We'd have to know more about her to know if that's the case.
It could be a pattern. That she enjoys studying, finds it rewarding, suits her personality and academic skills, takes up a new subject intensively, then after some time moves on to the next. Studying hard can be so firmly rewarded in childhood and young adulthood that it sits inside a comfort zone and helps a person feel worthy or of value. JMO
But how did this "accident" occur?Again, they're not blaming the Asian grocer.
That it was a tragic accident.
2m ago20.50 EDTI'm probably unable to do the regular updates today , if someone wants to help out MrJ, that would be great.
I'll post the live links here
![]()
Erin Patterson says estranged husband asked her about poisoning his parents — as it happened
Erin Patterson is giving evidence for a third day in her triple-murder trial in Morwell. She's accused of murdering three relatives by serving them a meal that contained poisonous mushrooms. Look back at how Wednesday's hearing unfolded in our live blog.www.abc.net.au
![]()
Accused mushroom killer’s wild dehydrator admission
RECAP: Accused triple murdered Erin Patterson has described how she secretly disposed of a food dehydrator and kept information hidden from health authorities before changing phones.thenightly.com.au
![]()
Erin Patterson says estranged husband asked her about poisoning his parents — as it happened
Erin Patterson is giving evidence for a third day in her triple-murder trial in Morwell. She's accused of murdering three relatives by serving them a meal that contained poisonous mushrooms. Look back at how Wednesday's hearing unfolded in our live blog.www.abc.net.au
![]()
It’s not plausibleWhat's been implied by her testimony today, I think what they are trying to suggest is:
- she did a lot of foraging as a matter of course.
- she did a lot of dehydrating mushrooms as a matter of course.
- at some point she did pick mushrooms from near an oak tree and these were dehydrated and stored.
- she was in the habit of storing her wild dehydrated mushrooms in a tupperware box and then sprinkling them into things; that box (multiple boxes) would contain a mix of different dehydrated wild mushrooms gathered previously at a range of times.
- for the meal her intention was to use fresh mushrooms from woollies and dried mushrooms from an Asian store. And that this is also what she believed she had done.
- when she purchased the dried asian mushrooms they were smelly so she stored them in a tupperware.
- implication is that she used the fresh mushrooms from woollies as planned, went to grab the dried shop bought ones from the tupperware, confused it with one of her many other tupperwares full of dried mushrooms (or perhaps had stored them all together), inadvertently introduced death caps accidentally foraged at a previous date into the meal unbeknownst to her.
- she then vomits up her meal AND/OR as she is adding dried mushrooms randomly from multiple tuppers, she just happens not to get dosed.
Does it do enough of a job at introducing reasonable doubt? It actually does a pretty good job, imo. After that you are left with explaining her behaviour in the wake of the dinner, which is largely circumstantial actions or could be attributed to guilt.
Do i personally buy it? On balance, I don't. But it's good enough to give me pause, and that's all the defense needs.
If the defense thinks Erin can hold it together under pressure—calm, sympathetic, non-defensive—they might let cross start Friday, to prove she’s unshakable.I think we will have at least two more days of this nonsense before the prosecutors get their shot at her. Her attorneys will not want the jury going into the weekend after she has to answer any of their questions.
Key Event
Just now
Mushroom photos dating back to 2020 shown
By Joseph Dunstan
Erin says another photo was taken in the garden to try and identify what was growing at her home at the time.
Another photo shows what Erin describes as some mushrooms sitting on paper towel.
Erin says another photo shows a flooded paddock at the property, in roughly April-May, 2020.
She describes how a blocked pipe caused the paddock to "fill right up".
The discussion continues at quite a fast pace as Mr Mandy takes his client through the collection of photos, only pausing briefly to ask a question or two before continuing.
"I'm not sure where that photo would have been taken," Erin says of a photo of a mushroom piece sitting on the ground outside.
We go through several photos which Erin says show mushrooms sitting on her kitchen sink.
If the defense thinks Erin can hold it together under pressure—calm, sympathetic, non-defensive—they might let cross start Friday, to prove she’s unshakable.
But if they fear she’ll come off as cold, inconsistent, or caught in contradictions, they’ll drag out direct examination and let the jury marinate in her emotional plea over the weekend.
Given how high-profile this is, and how carefully choreographed her testimony has been, I’d bet they’ll aim to finish direct examination Friday morning at the latest, giving just a short window for controlled cross to start—enough to tease conflict, but not so much that it dominates the jurors’ weekend thoughts.