- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 69,719
- Reaction score
- 266,742
Medical appointment queried
Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC picks up her cross-examination right where she left off.
On Friday, Erin Patterson told the court she had had an appointment booked in at an "Enrich" clinic in Melbourne in early September, 2023.
The court hears the appointment was later cancelled.
"The Enrich clinic does not offer gastric-bypass surgery or gastric-sleeve surgery. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers asks Erin.
"I don't know," Ms Patterson replies. She says she's "puzzled" because she recalls having an appointment with them for gastric-bypass surgery.
"It would have been related to weight-loss surgery, perhaps it was a different procedure I was doing with them ... I was looking into liposuction as well," Ms Patterson says.
Dr Rogers puts to Ms Patterson that she lied to the court when she said she had an appointment at the clinic for gastric-band surgery.
"Not, it wasn't a lie, that's what my memory was," Ms Patterson says.
![]()
"No, it wasn't a lie, that's what my memory was," Ms Patterson says.
I hope she keeps saying that because now we know we cannot trust her 'memories' because she either does not remember anything OR she remembers incorrectly. IMO
Her evidence was that 'she had an appointment set for September for Bariatric Surgery', in a health clinic that does not do that type of surgery.
And she says it was not a lie, because it was her memory.

[Just like she says this
