- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 16,305
- Reaction score
- 270,213
I am never buying a food dehydrator from a thrift store.
JMO
JMO
Yes!! I do recall reading that she was an avid reader of the crime/mystery genre. It is not a stretch to imagine some of the poisonings in Agatha Christie novels inspired/informed her actions in the alleged murders and any past poisoning attempts.You know what, this does sound like a storyline right out of an Agatha Christie novel. And then there were none, A Murder is announced etc. Turns out the host/hostess is the murderer, meaning to stage a murder party.
If the cancer was a lie, what was the purpose if the luncheon?
Doh.
JMO
Absolutely! Can you imagine?And it makes no sense! Inviting people over, which you've never done before, to serve a meal long in preparation (with or without death seasoning), to alert them to a... health concern. I've gathered you all here today, let me adjust my dramatic flourish, to... tell you I'm having a biopsy.
No one does that. Certainly not Erin, with any other health concerns she might have had.
So she's suddenly an alarmist? Wants to bring in-laws in so they can properly worry? Oh, but notice, I could be dying of Cancer Biopsy but my only concern is the children.
Erin, if you didn't invite them over to tell them you had cancer, why did you invite them? And what was so very important but super secret you couldn't tell them over the phone?
I have questions.
JMO
Surely if he suspected she was capable of poisoning, he wouldn’t allow his elderly family members to attend though? Or let his children continue to live with her!Maybe that’s why he declined going to the lunch though
Agreed! Although selfishly I really want her to stand, because her attempts to explain it all would be totally fascinating!Highly unlikely IMO. The Prosecution would make mincemeat (sans mushrooms) of her given her litany of admitted lies.
But he didn't say HE didn't go because he feared bring poisoned, did he? I suspect rather he didn't want a browbeating or an embarrassment in front of people. Bowed out.Surely if he suspected she was capable of poisoning, he wouldn’t allow his elderly family members to attend though? Or let his children continue to live with her!
Agreed! Although selfishly I really want her to stand, because her attempts to explain it all would be totally fascinating!
This in particular is fascinating behaviour. It’s giving so-called ‘duper’s delight’: as if she was so proud of her (alleged) actions that she needed to tell someone, somehow.Telling Simon about the dehydrator at the hospital, and the experiments with muffins, and then denying to police that it ever existed.
Well certainly uncaring by both Simon and Erin. Clever work by the defence is what i was meaning.
Obviously, everything Mr Mandy asked has a specific purpose which will all be pulled together at the end.
It doesn't hurt to play devil's advocate sometimes.
If you ask....What did the prosecution get out of Simon to show Erin intentionally poisoned her guests? ...Are you any closer?
It is specifically *young* death caps that resemble puffballs. It’s a well known issue in foraging for the danger it presents.
This photo shows death caps. Note the young ones on the right.
View attachment 583423
These are puffballs:
View attachment 583424
I think it’s likely the defence might suggest that this is what she mistook them for. I’m not saying it’s true — simply that it would make a plausible line of defence.
It does seem like she could have got away with it, with only some fairly simple planning.
Ditch the burner phone in advance. Turn off her phone when foraging. Announce she was going vegan a few months in advance and so be ‘unable’ to eat the same meal as her guests. Immediately admit that the mushrooms were foraged and claim she may have picked them in error. Retain the dehydrator and offer it to police right away to show compliance and a desire to help.
I was thinking the only way she could have gotten away with themass murderfungicide would be consuming a small measured amount of the toxin herself, but admittedly I like your vegan idea better. The idea of half-killing ones self in one of the most awful ways possible is not appealing. Even if it means staying out of jail.
I do wonder though, if she had planned on a different meal like individual shepard's pies with no mushrooms at all (aside from the powdered Death Caps), would the hospital staff have still figured it out?
I feel like once they knew mushrooms were in the dish, it made the notion of poison mushrooms an immediate possibility.
I too think that this might have been a test and that she had originally considered sneaking powdered death caps into another dish.Perhaps sneaking (safe) mushroom powder into the children’s brownies was to test whether or not they could taste it? Just a thought.
Like you, I don't think she would take any risk of poisoning herself. Funny, she knew to say she was in the bathroom every 20 minutes (when she wasn't), mirroring those who were actually poisoned. All you would have had to do is self-medicate (laxatives, diuretics), then play up symptoms. Based on the alleged crime, it would appear that everyone at lunch got food poisoning. Therefore no suspicion, for the very reason no one is going to poison herself.JMO it seems like the accused would have had enough knowledge about death caps to know not to try to make herself even a little ill by consuming a small amount of the poisonous mushrooms. Look how much we’ve learned here just from casual Google research. Would any of you risk eating any part of a death cap in order to fake poisoning? I wouldn’t, especially when there are non fatal alternatives like those already mentioned.
So I do believe there were two batches of mushrooms or else maybe powdered mushrooms sneaked into coffee or gravy as suggested by posters. Perhaps sneaking (safe) mushroom powder into the children’s brownies was to test whether or not they could taste it? Just a thought.
In the end I believe she fed herself and the kids safe food: IMO that’s going to factor in big time when considering intent. MOO