Australia - 3 dead after eating wild mushrooms, Leongatha, Victoria, Aug 2023 #8 *Arrest*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
I do believe it was intentional but she thought they d all just get sick
She didn’t believe the food was deadly
And she still can’t bring herself to say it !!

If she hadn't got rid of her phone, that might be more believable. She certainly knew to get rid of her current phone, and to do a remote factory reset (3 times) on what she said was her current phone, while that phone was in police custody.

She spent the time to learn how to do a remote factory reset.

I am just hoping that her Google account (if she had one) still shows her Google searches, and that the police have been able to get that information from Google.
Or that the police had already downloaded all data from her phone before she was able to do 3 remote factory resets.

Do the police know, for sure, that she visited the site that told of the local sightings of Death Cap mushrooms, or is that a supposition because she visited two of those sites right after the information was posted?



Just like on a computer, if your Chrome on Android or iPhone is synced with your Google account, you can retrieve your Chrome history. To do this, sign in to your account, and your Chrome search history will return.

 
Last edited:
  • #182
What’s funny about this case is how much of the evidence *could* have a plausible explanation, if each piece is taken alone.

She could have just picked the wrong mushrooms in error
She could have just been lucky to get a lot less sick
She could have just panicked about the dehydrator and made the false statement
SM’s father could have been mistaken about her claiming to have cancer
She could just be phobic of hospitals
She could have only had 4 matching plates
The mushroom brownie thing could just be an unrelated coincidence
The forum death cap locations could just be locally known mushroom foraging spots

Taken in isolation, each one of these can be made to sound somewhat plausible. Enough to even create some reasonable doubt, probably.

But when you put them all together, the scales really tip. Believing that all of these things are true together means believing the accused is one of the world’s most unfortunate people, suffering a perfect storm of terrible coincidences and incredibly unlikely events.

I can see why she had a crack at pleading not guilty, I suppose, but I really don’t think there’s any chance she’ll be getting off.
That's about where I'm at with it. Early on (points 1, 2, 3), it seemed possible she might not have planned it and some of us were considering the alternatives. But as more and more comes out, it gets harder and harder to explain away and I'm not sure she's worth the effort.
 
  • #183
He wanted the marriage to work, more than she did, iny opinion.
Marriage was a stage on which she acted out her assorted disorders. Everyone minor characters in her self drama.

It had to be exhausting, trying to make sense of her.

JMO
 
  • #184
Okay, thank y'all for the clarification. That's kind of what I was thinking----this was analysed and standardised to compute his monthly child support bill.

So it's kind of unfair for the defense to try and 'shame' Simon for the paltry payment, if in fact it was the legally correct amount he owes. IMO
Yep. I would say, based on what we've seen of him so far, that it's that low because he's an actively involved parent already, not a deadbeat dad. If his care percentage is high he's already doing what a good coparent would do and already paying for a lot. Erin is wealthy enough too, which also matters. The only way the $40 is bad is if he's lying about his income, which doesn't seem to fit with what we've seen of his character or his career.
 
  • #185
Yep. I would say, based on what we've seen of him so far, that it's that low because he's an actively involved parent already, not a deadbeat dad. If his care percentage is high he's already doing what a good coparent would do and already paying for a lot. Erin is wealthy enough too, which also matters. The only way the $40 is bad is if he's lying about his income, which doesn't seem to fit with what we've seen of his character or his career.

I read in one of the recent articles (I think in The Age) that Simon had always paid the children's school fees out of a substantial chunk of money that his own grandmother gave all of her grandchildren each year.

imo

ETA: I actually read that in the SMH .... Mushroom cook’s husband Simon gives evidence on marriage struggles, plate colour, cancer claims: Trial day two, as it happened
 
Last edited:
  • #186
Death Investigator and host of the podcast Body Bags, Joseph Scott Morgan, joins Websleuths.com for Ask Me Anything on Wednesday, May 7th at 8 PM Eastern.
Websleuths members, post your questions at the link below, and then join us live on Wednesday as Joseph Scott Morgan answers your questions on Websleuths.
Post questions at this link Joseph Scott Morgan, Death Investigator, Ask Me Anything May 7th @8:00 PM Eastern
Josepth Scott Morgan host of Body Bags
 

Attachments

  • Morgan-Joe-Scott.webp
    Morgan-Joe-Scott.webp
    30.3 KB · Views: 8
  • #187
  • #188
  • #189

WATCH: Recap of the first week of the mushroom murder trial​

By Judd Boaz​

If you missed the first week of proceedings in the Erin Patterson murder trial, the ABC's Iskhandar Razak will bring you up to speed with this recap.


Video at link.
 
  • #190
  • #191
  • #192
Waiting…
 
  • #193
  • #194
Just about every seat in the courtroom is full again. There are lots of reporters, and some of the Patterson family have come to watch, along with a few members of the public.

Erin Patterson is in the court dock, dressed in a sage green jumper. Simon Patterson has also returned to the witness dock, dressed in his regular court attire of a suit and tie.

The jury has been kept out of the room for a little bit this morning, but have now taken their seats. In an encouraging sign, all 15 have returned after the weekend break.
 
  • #195
I’m publishing from abc.net unless otherwise noted.

The defence begins by focusing on Simon Patterson's memory in the days after the lunch, with his parents and aunt and uncle still battling illness in the hospital.

Colin Mandy SC asks whether it would be fair to say that Mr Patterson's memory would be better in the days around the incident in 2023 than now.

He asks a series of open-ended questions to Mr Patterson.

"Your memory would have been better at the time than it is now about these events?" Mr Mandy said.

"It would be understandable now to not be able to recall the number of phone calls.

"It's possible you got the timing of things wrong … the order of things wrong?"
 
  • #196
What’s Mandy driving at?
 
  • #197
On Friday, Simon Patterson told the court that Erin Patterson did not ask how his parents were faring following the poisoned lunch.

Mr Mandy presses Mr Patterson on this point, asking if it was possible he simply forgot that she had asked while both were in hospital:

Colin Mandy SC: What I’m suggesting to you Mr Patterson is that she asked that question: How are they going?

Simon Patterson: No, I can’t recall her asking that.

Colin Mandy SC: It’s possible she asked that question and you can’t recall.

Simon Patterson: I’d say possible but unlikely because it stood out to me … it’s a feeling I remember, which is, ‘that’s odd’.
 
  • #198
The court heard Simon was taking phone calls to relatives in the hospital while visiting Patterson and their children, which Mandy suggested were in earshot of Patterson, which may have prompted her to ask about his parents’ health.


Mandy: “I put to you that she asked how they are going.”

Simon: “No, I can’t recall her asking that.”

Mandy: “I put it to you that she may have said something.”

Simon: “I say no, because it stood out to me. It is a feeling I remember - (I thought) ‘that’s odd’.”
 
  • #199
From abc.net:

The Patterson's connection with the Korumburra Community Development Association is raised by the defence.

Don Patterson served as treasurer, while his wife Gail served as secretary and Erin produced the Burra Flyer, a community newspaper.

Mr Mandy says all three resigned due to Gail becoming ill with encephalitis.
——

Group chat messages re-examined by defence​

By Judd Boaz​

Last week, we heard that Erin had messaged a group chat that included Simon, Don and Gail about her issues with child support payments.

Simon last week told the court they were "inflammatory messages" and that she was being "extremely aggressive".

Mr Mandy had disputed Mr Patterson's use of the term "aggressive".

"That's not the right way of categorising it, is it? She was upset, she was hurt," Mr Mandy says.

"Perhaps you could put up the messages that she messaged the group [chat] that I mentioned and we could see," Mr Patterson says.
Today, Mr Mandy has prepared these messages to show to the court.

A few moments are needed to sort out the technical issues of presenting the messages.
 
  • #200
Messages from December 5, 2022, sent to a group Signal chat detail Erin Patterson's concerns around Simon Patterson changing his marital status to separated.

The court hears that in the messages, Ms Patterson says that due to this decision, she had missed out on tens of thousands of dollars worth of child support payments.

In the chat, which includes her in-laws, calls out Mr Patterson for shirking his financial responsibilities.

"I foolishly trusted that he would do right by me and the kids when it came to the crunch," she writes.
In the messages, Don Patterson attempts to mediate the financial issues.

Ms Patterson says she will continue to voice her concerns in the group chat, and says that she believes Don and Gail should be aware of the actions of their son Simon regarding their grandchildren.

She raises the payment of school fees, saying Simon must either pay for half the fees at the children's school or she may initiate legal action.
——

Simon Patterson says defence has wrong messages​

By Judd Boaz​

When asked about the conversation, Simon Patterson says these are not the messages he objected to when talking about "aggressive" messages last week in court.

Mr Mandy starts to continue his reading of the messages, but is stopped by Justice Beale, who asks if it is necessary given that these are not the messages Mr Patterson was referring to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
2,787
Total visitors
2,851

Forum statistics

Threads
633,220
Messages
18,638,113
Members
243,451
Latest member
theoiledone
Back
Top