The smoking gun (and alleged weapon) is the dehydrator. The death caps were the bullets. IMO
In my mind, the dehydrator isn't a smoking gun, because its existence along with the Deathcap residue and Erin's fingerprints is not disputed. The guests ate their own murder weapons, the tainted Beef Wellingtons. That is not in dispute either.
Her defence, simply put, is that she accidentally picked Deathcaps while foraging for edible mushrooms, unknowingly dehydrated and stored them, and unknowingly fed them to her guests in Beef Wellingtons at the ill fated lunch.
When questions were asked, she panicked, claimed the mushrooms to be store bought, and dumped the dehydrator.
If those actions alone were her
only indiscretions, perhaps one could at least see it as being plausible.
I think the broader question is how Erin and her defence are going to explain away the massive trail of other indiscretions, and in my opinion, there are so many of them that it boggles the mind how she thinks she has any chance of walking free.
I'm curious whether she actually might take the stand in this trial, because without her testimony, how
will she explain the aforementioned indiscretions?
Some might say she doesn't need to, and technically it's true. The defence tactic at this point in time is simply trying to cast doubt on each of the prosecutions witnesses. That's standard practice for defence attorneys, but thus far, I don't think its really working.