- Joined
- Feb 16, 2019
- Messages
- 201
- Reaction score
- 2,603
Dbm duplicate post
RSBMI think manslaughter would be a much easier and more likely charge to prove beyond reasonable doubt, tbh. Death caused by recklessness or negligence.
Her cream-coloured pants.Unless her pants had tight elastic around the ankles.![]()
And how her portion contained no toxic mushrooms.In my mind, the dehydrator isn't a smoking gun, because its existence along with the Deathcap residue and Erin's fingerprints is not disputed. The guests ate their own murder weapons, the tainted Beef Wellingtons. That is not in dispute either.
Her defence, simply put, is that she accidentally picked Deathcaps while foraging for edible mushrooms, unknowingly dehydrated and stored them, and unknowingly fed them to her guests in Beef Wellingtons at the ill fated lunch.
When questions were asked, she panicked, claimed the mushrooms to be store bought, and dumped the dehydrator.
If those actions alone were her only indiscretions, perhaps one could at least see it as being plausible.
I think the broader question is how Erin and her defence are going to explain away the massive trail of other indiscretions, and in my opinion, there are so many of them that it boggles the mind how she thinks she has any chance of walking free.
I'm curious whether she actually might take the stand in this trial, because without her testimony, how will she explain the aforementioned indiscretions?
Some might say she doesn't need to, and technically it's true. The defence tactic at this point in time is simply trying to cast doubt on each of the prosecutions witnesses. That's standard practice for defence attorneys, but thus far, I don't think its really working.
These days … she would probably end up on reality TV .. like Bush Tucker challenge …Not really, only in theory. It would likely mean that for the rest of your life most people will shun you, and believe you are a murderer. It wasn't quite the same for Lizzie Borden of course, being in America, but after being acquitted of the axe murder of her father and stepmother, she kept on living in her home town, but then, and to this day, she is generally believed to be guilty. It would be quite a burden.
Or MKRThese days … she would probably end up on reality TV .. like Bush Tucker challenge …
As evidenced by her Facebook friends, she had been adding powdered mushrooms to everything and feeding to her kids who don’t like mushrooms. So potentially she was using her kids to work out the threshold that mushrooms could be added to food before their flavour was detected. She may have told her Facebook friends she had added to x and y, but in fact been adding to x, y and z.I've been saying this the whole time that even the DC powdered mushrooms could have been served in coffee or any strong tasting food. I also suspect that if EP is guilty she only used a tiny amount and had the idea that her guests would just become slightly unwell or begin to develop long term conditions that could never be linked to her meal.
As a sort of revenge maybe if she were unhappy with the relatives or maybe even so they would become infirm and need her assistance and this would 'bring her back into the fold' as it were.
JMO MOO
I wish the jury and court had her Google search history, but of course they (VIC Pol) never retrieved Phone A.As evidenced by her Facebook friends, she had been adding powdered mushrooms to everything and feeding to her kids who don’t like mushrooms. So potentially she was using her kids to work out the threshold that mushrooms could be added to food before their flavour was detected. She may have told her Facebook friends she had added to x and y, but in fact been adding to x, y and z.
Once she’s established, via her kids, what foods she can add mushrooms too undetected (e.g a condiment or a beverage), she has then played this out with the dried DCs at the lunch.
Why she bothered with a BW was to have the red herring - a dish with mushrooms that could be tested if guests fell ill. Given Ian reports they look like a pastie, imo doesn’t sound too fancy, but perhaps fancy enough that it would be enough to lure the likes of Simon to the lunch which is ultimately what she wanted.
Or Coffee...So, maybe too many laxatives?
So are we to conclude that the heat involved in using a dehydrator isn't sufficient to kill the toxins then?Yes, she wanted to see if her kids detected them in the muffins IMO.
Poisoners just take longer to kill their victims, but they are just as insidious of murderers, maybe worse so. It's premeditated and not done in impulsive anger. There have been many female poisoners throughout history, and many female murders. Watch the show "Deadly Women" for examples.I see your point, and I had no doubt at all he murdered him on purpose, but during that trial I remember thinking that the defence did a pretty good job of making it sound accidental. I suspected he would have a good chance of getting off that charge at the time.
I can’t see that here, but we are dealing with cooking and not a gun, and people don’t want to believe that women can murder in cold blood, so I’m not totally confident.
Yes, the heat involved in using a food dehydrator is insufficient to destroy toxins in poisonous mushrooms.So are we to conclude that the heat involved in using a dehydrator isn't sufficient to kill the toxins then?
So are we to conclude that the heat involved in using a dehydrator isn't sufficient to kill the toxins then?
Wonder who taste-tested them???“Death caps are said to taste very nice, so unfortunately taste and smell aren’t too helpful in that case at all,” Orlovich says.
“If I wasn't expecting someone was going to poison me and I didn't even know they collected some of them in the wild, then I can tell you I would sit down to that meal and probably not notice.”
It’s not just the taste either. The colour and texture are unlikely to ring alarm bells either.
“When they caramelise, they do the same thing as normal mushrooms. They're not that different,” he says.
Yes, NZ has ‘Death Cap’ mushrooms. Here’s what to do if you accidentally eat them
Erin probably chose mushrooms (food) as opposed to using medicine to poison them so that her fall-back defense could be "accidental". It's not so easy to claim that when you use a drug or chemical to poison someone.Poisoners just take longer to kill their victims, but they are just as insidious of murderers, maybe worse so. It's premeditated and not done in impulsive anger. There have been many female poisoners throughout history, and many female murders. Watch the show "Deadly Women" for examples.
I think Simon was incredibly naive. I wonder if he's seen the light since?I think you’re spot on. Simon said she told him she fell asleep on the floor for those 45 minutes. What a ridiculous story
She was definitely cleaning up the crime scene, IMO.
True, seems alot of women use poisoning to kill. There are heaps of books on them.Poisoners just take longer to kill their victims, but they are just as insidious of murderers, maybe worse so. It's premeditated and not done in impulsive anger. There have been many female poisoners throughout history, and many female murders. Watch the show "Deadly Women" for examples.
Wonder who taste-tested them???