Beyond that, ideally there would be wider knowledge on the impacts of media bias/representation and how this influences public perception. A huge part of Erin’s guilt was assumed only days after the lunch due to her “strange” wording, facial expressions and overall behaviour. There is a general lack of public knowledge in terms of nuances associated with conditions such as ASD. Occasionally this introduces harmful barriers during the investigation process (and following, for others who may be under the ND umbrella).
Yes, she's a danger to society. Even if she got out as an old lady, what's to stop her from poisoning someone again? It's not like she needs physical strength to do that. Far easier than stabbing or strangling someone.The thing is they were such heinous crimes. Calculated and thought out. She deserves the maximum punishment. Please no parole. She’s a risk to the community.
moo
Thank you. I'm curious as to what's meant by the term as well.FWIW I work in academic mental health (my PhD was in neuropsychiatry) and I find her psychologically fascinating. A lot of people do.
Also curious what "reform" means in the context above. A loved one works in restorative justice (he works closely with a man named Jacob Dunne, who I recommend googling if anyone is interested in restorative justice). But Erin would pretty obviously never be a candidate for restorative justice. Not sure how else Erin is relevant to the research being done into "reform."
I've said this before, but as a diagnosed autistic person this isn't something I'm comfortable with.
The rat detail is unhinged. It's like something from a movie. Maybe Erin's crocheted rats will become the new Gacy clown paintings.
Yeah, she may not have had a lot of choice in the prison library.Wonder how she got a rat crochet pattern in there?![]()
If she did get parole in her '80s, I'm pretty sure a condition of release would be that she never serve food or beverages to others.FWIW I work in academic mental health (my PhD was in neuropsychiatry) and I find her psychologically fascinating. A lot of people do.
Also curious what "reform" means in the context above. A loved one works in restorative justice (he works closely with a man named Jacob Dunne, who I recommend googling if anyone is interested in restorative justice). But Erin would pretty obviously never be a candidate for restorative justice. Not sure how else Erin is relevant to the research being done into "reform."
I've said this before, but as a diagnosed autistic person this isn't something I'm comfortable with.
The rat detail is unhinged. It's like something from a movie. Maybe Erin's crocheted rats will become the new Gacy clown paintings.
Correct.
"Erin Patterson, I sentence you to a life sentence, with a non-parole period of 35 years."
Or
"Erin Patterson, I sentence you to a life sentence, without parole."
Option B has a nice ring to it.
In my opinion, nothing she does is an accident, I fully believe it’s a passive aggressive taunt and insult. Betrayal, feeling ripped off, etc. I imagine she’s seething at her legal team for not winning, which I imagine most people would feel especially after such a large spend on it. But this is Erin. Sending passive aggressive taunts is how she is. IMOMy memory instantly jumped to Cosa Nostra sending a fish as the message, “he sleeps with the fishes”..,
The “rat” who “rats” on the mafia also came from their lexicon.
So maybe a warning to keep one’s mouth shut?
What is the minimum for Murder? 25 years?me too!
I still reckon if it’s not LWOP it has to be at least 42-45 Non parole period. 30 is expected for one murder. Take away a discount for her ‘terrible prison conditions’and you can’t really get below the 40s, IMO
But of course, LWOP is the only appropriate sentence, IMO
What is the minimum for Murder? 25 years?
And I don't believe there is a minimum sentence for Attempted Murder?
Surely he has to raise that low bar.![]()
It is usually a concurrent sentence. Which really annoys me. 3 lives should equal 3 sentences.What is the minimum for multiple murders?
What is the minimum for Murder? 25 years?
And I don't believe there is a minimum sentence for Attempted Murder?
Surely he has to raise that low bar.![]()
Yes this annoys me too. Why stop at one person when you'll get the same for 3, 5, or 11. It's no deterrentIt is usually a concurrent sentence. Which really annoys me. 3 lives should equal 3 sentences.