Kat
Kind words do not cost much
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 17,185
- Reaction score
- 1,247
I thought about Bob when I laid down last night for bed. That seems to be when I do my best pondering.
There was questions about why Fontelle would have changed the locks. FWIW, I asked myself now why would she do that? Here is a few "whys" I came up with---colored by the filter of having watched a lot of upset and bickering over a will and property in my extended family---
1. How many people had keys to Bob's home?
2. How many of those people that had keys were used to letting themselves in when they needed to or wanted to?
3. Did someone enter with a key without regard to Fontelle's privacy? KWIM?
That can make someone change a lock pronto. JMHO.
But then again, who really knows why she chose to change the locks when she did. JMHO.
I wonder if LE knew that the daughters were posting on the internet and I wonder if they got copies of the posts before they were removed from that forum? I wonder if they are deleted forever or could be accessed to be given to the LE, just in case they haven't seen them. No laws broken, just wonder if LE would find anything interesting in them?
We have the late morning and early afternoon of the day Bob went missing. He has SIL with him at the house. There is a time gap, but we don't know how long of one between the last time someone spoke to Bob by phone (LE should have a record of that call once they know who claimed to have made that call IIRC it was Fontelle?) and when the SIL says he returned from running errands to find the housekeeper on the front porch and Bob gone.
Theoretically, that puts the onus of the disappearance on SIL's shoulders. However, we at WS aren't always ready to look at the obvious before we exclude the unobvious first.
My question is (since on AMW the LE has stated the only theory they have ruled out is that Bob met foul play by a stranger) did someone else that Bob knows come to the house in that short period of time. OR did someone come to the house while SIL was there and they both did something to Bob?
It would appear that family members have been given the LDT but we don't know which ones and we don't know the results. FWIW, people fail LDT's all the time but it doesn't result in an arrest.
I read elsewhere yesterday that none of Bob's accounts have had any movement since he has been missing. Did he have unknown accounts (going with Cubby's thoughts here).
I agree that Money could very well have been the motive Susie. It might have been the secondary motive though as well. I'm not discounting anyone's thoughts about this because together I think we can help bring Bob's case back into the forefront.
If we go by the assumption that SIL (and possibly another person who was either with him, or joined him at the home, or came while SIL was gone-which the latter leaves a very tiny window of opportunity) was responsible what kind of window of time are we talking about and how far could he have traveled within that time frame? Might give us a picture as to where Bob might be or was if he wasn't moved afterwards. JMHO.
There was questions about why Fontelle would have changed the locks. FWIW, I asked myself now why would she do that? Here is a few "whys" I came up with---colored by the filter of having watched a lot of upset and bickering over a will and property in my extended family---
1. How many people had keys to Bob's home?
2. How many of those people that had keys were used to letting themselves in when they needed to or wanted to?
3. Did someone enter with a key without regard to Fontelle's privacy? KWIM?
That can make someone change a lock pronto. JMHO.
But then again, who really knows why she chose to change the locks when she did. JMHO.
I wonder if LE knew that the daughters were posting on the internet and I wonder if they got copies of the posts before they were removed from that forum? I wonder if they are deleted forever or could be accessed to be given to the LE, just in case they haven't seen them. No laws broken, just wonder if LE would find anything interesting in them?
We have the late morning and early afternoon of the day Bob went missing. He has SIL with him at the house. There is a time gap, but we don't know how long of one between the last time someone spoke to Bob by phone (LE should have a record of that call once they know who claimed to have made that call IIRC it was Fontelle?) and when the SIL says he returned from running errands to find the housekeeper on the front porch and Bob gone.
Theoretically, that puts the onus of the disappearance on SIL's shoulders. However, we at WS aren't always ready to look at the obvious before we exclude the unobvious first.
My question is (since on AMW the LE has stated the only theory they have ruled out is that Bob met foul play by a stranger) did someone else that Bob knows come to the house in that short period of time. OR did someone come to the house while SIL was there and they both did something to Bob?
It would appear that family members have been given the LDT but we don't know which ones and we don't know the results. FWIW, people fail LDT's all the time but it doesn't result in an arrest.
I read elsewhere yesterday that none of Bob's accounts have had any movement since he has been missing. Did he have unknown accounts (going with Cubby's thoughts here).
I agree that Money could very well have been the motive Susie. It might have been the secondary motive though as well. I'm not discounting anyone's thoughts about this because together I think we can help bring Bob's case back into the forefront.
If we go by the assumption that SIL (and possibly another person who was either with him, or joined him at the home, or came while SIL was gone-which the latter leaves a very tiny window of opportunity) was responsible what kind of window of time are we talking about and how far could he have traveled within that time frame? Might give us a picture as to where Bob might be or was if he wasn't moved afterwards. JMHO.
