That’s a really good point (and a really good plan). Also, us armchair sleuths are vacillating all over the place too.
Someone in a thread or two above said that we tend to see this case according to our own world view. Which is a very good point I think, very wise.
There seem to be three general theories on here:
- They didn’t do it, they’re being framed, there’s a third man involved. This one just seems too far-fetched, imo.
- This was a robbery gone bad, their resultant actions being terror at the realization of what they did. They’re not really bad kids deep down, they’re just products of a bad environment. I appreciate the idealism behind this one, and I get it - but I don’t necessarily buy it.
- They’re thrill killers and this was a preplanned event. I don’t totally buy this one either, though I guess I’m sort of leaning in this general direction. I suspect that at least one of them really was a bad kid, all the way down, regardless of his past environment. But who the heck knows.
- Edited to add: see theory #4 below
I do think that one of the reasons this case is so compelling is that we don’t have a known reason for their actions, there are no answers - it’s an unsolved (and probably unsolvable) mystery - which is unsettling.