Hi Tricia! My wife and I lived near this event in Boulder, in 96, and it has always perplexed us. Although vaguely familiar with all the facts and spin, we did not revisit all this in detail until it’s been in the news this last week. We did just read, listen, and watch many of the various items you referenced here in the last few days. Of special interest was the consult series which you recommended.
The (very reputable) consult team is laser focused on this being a highly organized sexual crime that was well planned out. We were unaware of the excruciating level of sexual assault/activity in the JB case until listening to their documentary. Even their discussion on the “ransom note” is from a point that it was purposefully planned and crafted by the perp. In fact, they go to great length to discuss and dismiss any theories on a cover up, family involvement, etc…the intricate sexual nature of this event has the profilers settled on a non-family accomplished pedophile that every family would want caught and brought to justice.
The handwriting analysis link you posted, also an expert level, as well as the facts surrounding the scene at the home, the timeline of family actions, and the family’s actions in the aftermath do, however, absolutely point to some involvement and/or cover up. What was done to JB seems a uniquely entirely different subset to all the other data and evidence and actions of this case.
We personally don’t believe anyone in the family could or would do the horrific sexual things mentioned that were done to her. We also believe, along with you, that the note and the home and the post-murder actions appear staged.
So, how have you personally reconciled these two diametrically opposite beliefs? Genuinely interested. TIA. MOO.