- Joined
- Apr 6, 2011
- Messages
- 5,430
- Reaction score
- 35,228
Surely, you would do transfers of bitcoin on your own computer?I want to see video from that bitcoin machines…. Maybe perp experimented with his/her acct?
Surely, you would do transfers of bitcoin on your own computer?I want to see video from that bitcoin machines…. Maybe perp experimented with his/her acct?
THE Aphrodite Jones! WOW! Nice to have yo uhere.
The problem is the President says....many things. He has been known to be in error about a lot of situations and speaks "out of turn," IMO.
However as regards to everything else, your points are spot on. Thank you for all of this
Well said. The most important thing at the moment is for the family to get confirmation from the abductor that 1) they are actually communicating with the actual abductor. 2) They recieve proof of life. 3) as the family have already pointed out AI can be used to fake therefore the abductor needs to step up and address this issue.SO -- I've waited before making any comment because I felt we were all rushing to judgement. It's a human reaction to pin the crime on one of the nearest relatives, but it can also backfire. I know Savannah personally, and the last thing I want to do is bring more pain to the Guthrie family. Imagine if your mom was abducted and the public was pointing the finger at you. The sting would be that much greater. All that said, as of this AM, they have collected the elusive white van and as you all know, a second note was sent to KOLD yesterday which has been verified as coming from the same encrypted server. This note apparently made contact with the family, responding to the videos made by Savannah and her siblings. We now have President Trump indicating that officials are close to identifying the abductor or abductors. The horrible thing now, of course, is that we have no proof of life. I PRAY that Nancy is alive after being without her meds for 7 days. It is totally possible. Let's remember that. In fact, billboards are now being put up in AZ and surrounding states asking for the public's help. The hard question now is: WOULD YOU HIT SEND to give millions in crypto to this abductor before the deadline on Monday? If no one is caught this weekend, Savannah will be struggling with the possibility that non-payment could mean death for her mom... MY HEART IS BREAKING FOR HER...
We either have to take the case at face value, that the kidnapper took her for ransom as they have indicated or the taking her for ransom is a manufactured story to stall, throw off to conceal another related crime. At this point we really have to work it as its being portrayed and go from there. LE will slowly rule in or out each detail. Im holding on to faith that shes ok and a break soon!!Taking a moment to collect my thoughts.
NG is missing. That alone makes this an outlier. A break-in or SA, if there was a murder at all, no need to remove the victim. Unless for fear of DNA. But I don't think the details align with that all.
So why is she missing? Due to age/blood thinners, IMO it's entirely possible that her injury was unplanned, may have resulted from her mobility challenges, in which case, she would have gone missing with no sign of injury.
Why?
To hide DNA in the case of SA. If there was SA, I think LE knows that, based on the appearance of the crime scene.
If no obvious signs of SA, again, why is she missing?
Perpetrator needed her alive.
To aid in relocating her? Too heavy to carry? Force her to walk...
In order to swindle her? Take her to an ATM/Bitcoin and hope she has assets she can convert for you?
It's an anomaly. 84 year old victim. Missing. But likely alive when taken from her home.
It's easy to say that ransomers might be capitalizing on a news story. We know of one already.
But what I can't get past is that, if not as a set up for ransom, why was she removed from her home?
JMO
We discussed earlier that Silence of the Lambs was released on 31 Jan and 1 Feb 1991I'm curious about any thoughts about the timing of this crime? Feb 1st feels very intentional.
I've done some looking into Feb 1st such as the obvious holidays, but can't seem to find anything of importance. The date being the 1st of Feb may have nothing to do with anything, but it's been bothering me.
There's no universe where I would be able to remain silent, but everyone is different, and every case is different.
no. IMO.In addition to the many theories about why this happened, is it possible that NG’s kidnapping is a message to other journalists out there not to cover certain topics in the press? For example, the final batch of the Epstein files were released on 1/30 and NG went missing 2 days later. SG interviewed Epstein survivors in September of 2019. Perhaps she was planning on doing another interview regarding the info in the files or with other survivors? Do you think this could be a possibility? It could be seen as a warning to other journalists.
it is fine but so many others used the phrase that as an independent woman in my 70's wanted to make it clear that is on a case by c ase situation. For you and your mother that was great for both of you. From now on if someone implies that anyone over a certain age needs lots of care just going to ignore it and get on with finding Nancy.I just want to take a minute and apologize to all elders and NG. I have seen reference to “tucking in” so many times. I am the one who originally mentioned tucking my 86 year old mom into bed at night and locking her house up when I left. She didn’t want anyone overnight yet. But as I said, my mom was sick and her hospice days were weeks in the future. I literally helped her get in bed, fixed her sheets and blankets, removed her glasses and kissed her cheek. It was as much for me as it was for her. She died a few weeks later. I certainly did not mean to offend so many and wish I’d never used those words. NG did not need tucking in and I never meant to imply that.
No, sorry.Thanks,
All I remembered was speculation of something having been done "recently".
Did you remember if any particular contractor was mentioned?
They could get one immediately as they were in there if they spotted anything. They want them with their guard down.All they’d see is what is in plain sight and if they found anything it would be useless anyway without having a search warrant.
I have too and it depends on the outcome. She has an amazing platform to pivot from and her perspective is going to change after this experience. I just pray it turns out well for them. As time passes so does my hope.Completely agree. I've also been wondering what SG does next if there are no developments. It's rare journalists and news anchor end up becoming the story, I wonder if a return to Today would be too much for her, and possibly she is rethinking her life after this traumatic experience.
Apologies, another member has just given me their ages. I did not know they were so young, of course they are not involved!Don't even go there!!
No. I lost faith in AB in another case (I think it was Lori Vallow), it was obvious that she was not aware of many facts in that case( and the court cases that followed) , so I no longer watch her.Have you listened to what AB herself has had to say about that? She speaks on it.
I thought it was released on Feb 14th. There were some earlier premieres, most notable in NY and CA, but nothing tying it down to AZ, where this crime seems incredibly localized to.We discussed earlier that Silence of the Lambs was released on 31 Jan and 1 Feb 1991![]()
they have been careful to not speak about anything found in the house. Most agree that if there is blood outside it would be inside t oo.I read somewhere that LE confirmed DNA from blood was NG. My question is: have they revealed if any other DNA was retrieved? Just because they didn't speak on it, wouldn't necessarily mean they don't another sample, right?
I pondered the same thing. If this were an episode of Columbo from the 1970s, Peter Falk would be eyeing the understudy or anyone else who wanted to keep SG close to home. Columbo would've solved the case and Nancy would be safely back at home.Since it is extremely cold in my part of the country, I have been housebound. I should be catching up on housework, but this tragedy is just too compelling. So I have a kind of stream-of-consciousness thought process going on. I watched the Olympics opening ceremony last night and the commentators talked about how much SG loved hosting the Olympics and how much they all missed her. I was thinking that probably many more people would be watching the Olympics than would see SG on the "Today Show." What if someone wanted to punish SG? Let's say someone asked her for a sizable loan and she refused. Keeping her from hosting the Olympics could be revenge. It seems so very coincidental that the abduction of her dear mother should happen on the eve of SG's career-high gig. Just a random thought. Edited to add: just saw some similar thinking a few pages back.
Indeed, I was referring to the premieres in NY and CA. Might be a coincidence indeed!I thought it was released on Feb 14th. There were some earlier premieres, most notable in NY and CA, but nothing tying it down to AZ, where this crime seems incredibly localized to.
I also know the line in the video released to the kidnappers also lines up with a line in Silence of the Lambs, but that particular line did seem more of an attempt to humanize the victim, to have the culprit engage and speak with the victim. I'm not sold on Silence of the Lambs having anything solid to do with this crime.
Regardless, there is no coincidence too small to ignore, so I'll definitely keep this in mind.