- Joined
- Nov 8, 2003
- Messages
- 7,440
- Reaction score
- 12,350
We’re all exhausted.Thanks . Wiii edit.
We’re all exhausted.Thanks . Wiii edit.
Especially given the very dramatic knee jerk response to AB's initial revelation that SIL was possibly the person of interest. She was out on her own at the time, it wasn't every reporter, yet it justified the Sheriff releasing a very pointed press release.Possible the perpetrator(s) involved in this have been traced. In order to gather solid evidence and be sure the perpetrator(s) will be convicted, they aren't revealing much of what they know and are gathering rock-solid evidence before giving the public more information. JMO
Do you know if a camera can detect the passengers in a car via nighttime video? Would NG be actually seen in the car, or just the exterior of the car?I would think that aspect would be easier to prove - even if door cam's on NG's street aren't helpful b/c of lot size, I think saying Car X left House A and drove to House B at Y time would be easier to prove/disprove.
Seems that revealing a lot of information to the public could get in the way of what LE needs to do to build a solid case against the perpetrator(s). LE knows far more than about all of this than the rest of us. JMOmaybe, and maybe LE have kept alot more to their chest than we thought...
And someone said it may have been luminol. Sounds like a crime scene.At night? In the dark? With flashing lights in the garage?
Correct. At some point that watch was removed and placed on the charging device. I’m speculating the removal may have happened at front door causing a skin tear? I’m unsure how many feet from the front door NG’s bedroom is?The watch was charging in her bedroom. It was connected via Bluetooth to her pacemaker. After about 30 feet, Bluetooth drops out, so as NG was removed from her house, her pacemakers connection to her watched disappeared/dropped
Jmo
the blood wasn't smeared ... or a possible shoe print; even a corner of a shoe ... some of it should have been smeared if they were removing her from the home ... just all drops -- except the one patch of blood; that appears as if it was from nose/throat (from the lab results)P
Meaning that they staged it using her blood pouring it in the house and outside the door?
The FBI can with some new kind of magnetic fingerprint powder that has been developed to get fingerprints off of porous surfaces. It was discussed in a video with Brian Entin and Maureen O'Connell, former FBI.Can you get good fingerprints off of a rock?
Yes, I’m thinking this could’ve been a reason for LE visiting Circle K yesterday (?) requesting surveillance cameras footage looking for a vehicle of interest. Wasn’t it said this circle K was very close to AG/SIL’s home?I would think that aspect would be easier to prove - even if door cam's on NG's street aren't helpful b/c of lot size, I think saying Car X left House A and drove to House B at Y time would be easier to prove/disprove.
LifetimeMore Lifetime or Oxygen, less Hallmark. I'm not picturing a lovely ending here.
Do you think they were all asked to go to hotels and not be there because they had a feeling SIL was the perp but didn't want public to catch on? Like make it look like the family left due to privacy but really they were told they believe the house was a 2nd crime scene.What on earth could be going on at AG house? No one is supposed to be there right now.
I don't think LE has released anything but it is possible (actually definite) that they know more about that night than what has been said publicly about people's whereabouts or internet/phone activity.Other than being supposedly the last person to see NG alive, what makes SIL a suspect? He has been in the family for many years, has a respectable job ... what makes people suspect him? I don't believe finances are the driving factor here. NG is 84, at some point in the not too distant future they would be getting a share of inheritance. What do we know about SIL otherwise?
And that was the goal.bbm
I think the ransom situation threw a wrench into their investigation....lots of time and resources
That’s what I’m thinking. Maybe LE put camera there after the abduction in case perp went back?? Fam would have known if there was a camera on roof and if they didn’t, they wouldn’t have missed that. They are retrieving one they placed there or the object is not a cameraFWIW I don't think they're looking for a body.
I think they're looking for something that the ransomer manipulated.
GHI thinks maybe LE put a camera IN and was removing it.
JMO
I thought that SG's use of the world "celebrate" during the video was a bit odd. A bit too positive for such a horrible situation. I think it was either a code word that the kidnapper told SG to say OR SG's video response was 100% drafted by LE to keep the ransom story going until they can gather enough evidence for an arrest.My mind is on overdrive and may soon explode.
I'm thinking now, was SG's video today staged, as in SG knows more than she is saying? Trying to think this through...or discard the thought.
Almost too neat and perfectthe blood wasn't smeared ... or a possible shoe print; even a corner of a shoe ... some of it should have been smeared if they were removing her from the home ... just all drops -- except the one patch of blood; that appears as if it was from nose/throat (from the lab results)