SilentHill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2025
- Messages
- 75
- Reaction score
- 713
But then let's throw the statistics out the window for a second because obviously the blood was planted!The blood is a big sign she made it home.
But then let's throw the statistics out the window for a second because obviously the blood was planted!The blood is a big sign she made it home.
I see. Makes sense.No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.
Right! And someone risks being caught by staging a forced entrance to a house where they look directly into the camera. Come on now people.But then let's throw the statistics out the window for a second because obviously the blood was planted!I'd love to know how many times a perpetrator has actually done that before.
It's pretty easy for them to know what time the 911 call happened. They had that accurately from the start. It was the other time that was reported incorrectly---the time they arrived at Nancy's house.
And that made them look sketchy. And it seemed sketchy it took so long to call 911 but that was inaccurate info. And seemed sketchy that first it was reported that NG's daughter gave her a ride home but was later changed to say her SIL was the last to see her---again, it looked sketchy. But now it's back to daughter driving her home?
Nancy's pacemaker made it home too. We can safely assume it was still inside of her and she was alive.No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.
The social workers card left in the door. Its concerning. Did she call, did someone else call for elder abuse? Was N being financially or physically abused by someone in her family or a caregiver?Why do you think it's the family?
No Nancy's pacemaker was connected to her digital devices which were later found at home, thinking her pacemaker was at home while connected to them is a fallacy that hasn't been confirmedNancy's pacemaker made it home too. We can safely assume it was still inside of her and she was alive.
Very likely they went thru garage and didn’t use front door. An hour is not that long. Last thing I’d be thinking is that my mom was kidnapped and is about to be the biggest crime story in the country. Search house quickly, go outside and look around backyard, go back inside and search more slowly, start calling friends and family. And THEN call police.Ah. I remember reading that somewhere.
Let’s seperate and disregard the ransom demand for the time being, which has really been a major distraction.
Bizarre to me that it would take that long to report her missing, especially with the blood.
You get the word that your mum hasn’t arrived at church. You check her house and see she is missing and some obvious signs that something is very wrong.
It would not take an hour to contact the authorities unless you are covering something up or preparing for the performance of your life.
The random demand may be an unrelated opportunist, or a distraction.
This may be a very simple case, but so much noise…
It is not fallacy. The pacemaker was connected to her devices by the bluetooth which has limited range. For such device the range would be most probably the standard 10 meters/33 feet (might be less in the buildings) so Nancy and her pacemaker had to be near her devices, in order for them to stay connected. So her devices could not make it home without her.No Nancy's pacemaker was connected to her digital devices which were later found at home, thinking her pacemaker was at home while connected to them is a fallacy that hasn't been confirmed
I think I can say with total confidence, that the last person/s to see Nancy were the ones on her doorstep in the early hours of Sunday morning. We even have photographic evidence to support that.No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.
Good morning all,Thats because they have no corroborated information about that
In answer to your quoting my post and asking me directly- here’s my personalNG had birthday days prior to 1/31/26. So are you saying something like this is appropriate, "Hi Mom, we want to honor your birthday but we can't drive 10 mins to pick you up. Call Uber and get your own ride to our house 4 miles away. But don't worry, we will give you 2 mins to get from car to inside your garage around 9:48pm. Happy Birthday Mom." Despicable behavior imo if NG had to get her own transportation to a family neighborhood like dinner.
Not unless it was staged and planted thereThe blood is a big sign she made it home.
I’m going to guess that it is corroborated. If her door cam recorded the suspect walking up to the door, I suspect that it recorded a car in the driveway and Nancy exiting. We’re just not going to see that.No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.