The only thing about this, if i,'m the murderer inside, why woukd i be like, "hey clean up guy, meet me at the front door, ok buddy?" Why not, hey bro come around back door is wide open. Etc??? I honestly thought the intruders would have been inside and reached around from inside to grab camera. The very idea of walking up cold call style to the front door is still so wild to me.I wonder if the blood is throwing us off. We know it is NG’s blood, but do we know if it was “fresh”?
1. I’ve seen it posted here that masked man with flowers approached the front door at ~ 1:50am?
If the above is true, NG likely wasn’t removed from the home, via the front door, before 1:50am. If that time is not confirmed, the rest of what I have to say is likely irrelevant.
2. If NG was removed from the home through the front door (as we believe due to the blood) prior to 1:50am, there would be footage from that operable camera.
IF mask guy is a clean up guy:
it would stand to reason that NG wasn’t removed from the home via the front door, and the blood was from another time. There would be footage of them taking her out the front door prior to the camera being disabled. If she was removed prior to 1:50, we would see it just like we see masked man.
This tracks because it wouldn’t make sense for home intruders to enter through the rear of the home and then exit the front door, where you are open to being seen (yes, unlikely in that neighborhood, but still about the dumbest thing you could do). If your vehicle is in the side driveway, and you entered under darkness from the backyard, there is no logical reason to exit va the front door.
OR
NG was still in the house at 1:50, bound or dead, with a home intruder in the house and masked man was summoned to the house to help remove her. Masked man knows he’s approaching a crime scene, and is apprehensive; hence his hand on the gun. He notices the camera as he looks in the front door to make sure it’s safe and reaches for the flowers to hide himself before entering. Masked man is there to help remove the bleeding, injured or dead NG.
Again, this assumes what I’ve read here that he disabled the camera at 1:50 and a different camera picked up motion at 2:10. And pacemaker disconnected at about 2:30. If he was a “clean up guy”, he wasn’t doubling back to clean up after NG was removed. He was either working alone, there to help remove her or begin clean up while she was still in the home
Yes a kidnapping should be quick in and out of the home. Unless these guys were not too bright amateurs. Or if NG fought back. And they decided to take some items or do some clean up/staging. Even if robbers feel they have to kill someone it is quick and they exit right away. Don't hang around. All of it is a business crime, not personal.Right. It means masked man is there to help with the removal of NG, not that he was there as a clean up guy after the fact.
And I hate to say it, but the timeline is what leads me to believe she passed during the home invasion.
It was 40 minutes from camera destruction, to her being out of range of her phone. Seems if you are there for the purpose of kidnapping, you wouldn’t stay in the home with her for 40 minutes. If you are cleaning up a murder scene and burglarizing the home, you would
Asking as I have no idea how these apps work.
NG’s pacemaker app:
would the body’s panic response to a home invasion appear in the app data?
if she had a medical event, and died, during the home invasion would the app not pick that up?
We have heard of the app disconnecting, but not of any irregular activity prior to her being out of its range (presumably)
we presume the app disconnected because she moved out of range. Would the app disconnect just the same if she passed away in range of the app?
Maybe these guys wanted to be seen? The one guy looks right at the camera.The only thing about this, if i,'m the murderer inside, why woukd i be like, "hey clean up guy, meet me at the front door, ok buddy?" Why not, hey bro come around back door is wide open. Etc??? I honestly thought the intruders would have been inside and reached around from inside to grab camera. The very idea of walking up cold call style to the feont door is still so wild to me.
Porch lights are allowed. Mostly, they need to be pointed down and be under a certain wattage/lumens. (Former Catalina Foothills resident.)If he had done it before, why not bring something specially to cover up the door camera? Can he count on shrubbery to be present at every robbery?
I really would have thought that that would be done thoroughly 11 or 12 days ago.
Why on earth didn’t they do this sooner
Do we know if the pics and video released by the FBI are in fact the 2:12 “software detects person on camera” pics? Or are they from before the doorbell was disconnected? The camera he is trying to cover with the lantana is the Nest camera, right? Or is it a Ring doorbell? Did she have both?
I really would have thought that that would be done thoroughly 11 or 12 days ago.
Do they think someone is coming back to the scene?
Not to mention that AG/SIL basically gave over their house to LE who seem to come/go repeatedly for any purpose.It sounds like he wants SG to put pressure on others to get a lie detector test?
This guy's statement is rubbing me the wrong way too.
If they wanted to be seen or were trying to “stage a fake scene”, I think they would have just left the camera alone to record their presence/“fake kidnapping”, rather than disconnecting and removing it, which seems more like an attempt to remove video evidence.Maybe these guys wanted to be seen? The one guy looks right at the camera.
Yes, I am wondering the same!I am so curious about the searching and researching at NG and AG. Do they think someone is coming back, like you mentioned? Is it performative for some reason?
IMO I agree there's additional video we haven't seen.Just thinking about that door camera (based on something I saw on Twitter).
Removing the camera from the mount doesn’t stop it recording.
You’d have to break it, or remove it from WIFI range to do that.
So there is almost certainly additional video being held back.
You didn't ask me - however I feel like it is one thing to recheck something with new evidence and another to have to seemingly start all over again and find things that may have been evident the entire team (e.g. the other cameras). Performative I don't think so..lost/disorganized/didn't do a great job earlier on - possiblyI am so curious about the searching and researching at Nancy’s and Annie’s. Do they think someone is coming back, like you mentioned? Is it performative for some reason?
I think those are just nitrile gloves over work gloves. I do the same thing when I want to protect my hands but I’m also touching stuff I don’t want on my gloves possibly permanently.I could be wrong, but I think there is a video capture or render error there. Those gloves are THICK, like you would use for bbq or for handling dangerous chemicals. I’d be shocked to find out there is a hole in them.