At this point they probably did get into it, but it seems that it took a couple days.
I don't think that's true, JMO
At this point they probably did get into it, but it seems that it took a couple days.
Especially the ones from the back, looks more like a woman's physique. Walking around the city covered up like that must have caused some to take a second look. It's too buttoned up, imo.From these pics, POI could even pass for a woman
Agreed. Expensive clothes on that level are unremarkable, and typically on purpose that way. People with money, especially old money, don’t wear flashy things that scream brand logo all over. They are subtle, understated, restrained.I didn't want to sound like a California-brained snob but I could not agree with you more. I lived in the Bay for 6 years up until early this year and to certain demographics those clothes + that backpack would not only be considered not outrageous price-wise but also pretty unremarkable in every other way too. I don't think the clothes or backpack are going to prove significant and I also don't think they preclude him from holding hard-left/anticapitalist views, as some have speculated here.
Any conventional and unremarkable place in America.What (or where) is "Vanilla America"...??
100% ambivalence- they really wouldn't mind if he gets away with it. This is the almost universal reaction I see on the web and in person; especially from medical professionals.FWIW, "little sympathy" is a lot different than cheering for a murderer, imo.
We don't have to like a murder victim in order to condemn murder.
jmo
Has anyone thought that the words on the bullet cases could be a deliberate distraction? Seems a very obvious way to get the public and media excited about a people's vigilante, when in fact it could be a money related hit? (e.g. BT was going to somehow damage the company, or someone wanted an insurance payout)
Not at all likely scenario.Elaborating on the boxes this theory checks:
1. Motive - money, lots of it
2. Choice of NYC - to send a message to UH group and others that the hackers mean business. They made sure the actual shooting was captured on video for the world to see.
3. The coolheaded shooter - screams foreign assassin or hitman without a personal motive
4. The fact that they haven’t ided him so far or no one has outed him on social media - foreign mafia
5. The messages on the bullets - warning to UHC that these guys mean business.
6. Access to BT’s movements - easy for a hacking group to get access to his phone and track him remotely
JMO
Completely agree on 3 and 4, yepElaborating on the boxes this theory checks:
1. Motive - money, lots of it
2. Choice of NYC - to send a message to UH group and others that the hackers mean business. They made sure the actual shooting was captured on video for the world to see.
3. The coolheaded shooter - screams foreign assassin or hitman without a personal motive
4. The fact that they haven’t ided him so far or no one has outed him on social media - foreign mafia
5. The messages on the bullets - warning to UHC that these guys mean business.
6. Access to BT’s movements - easy for a hacking group to get access to his phone and track him remotely
JMO
There aren’t any. It’s probably because I’m a foreigner all the places I’ve been to seemed exotic. Even Kansas! Actually especially Kansas. And Utah.Any conventional and unremarkable place in America.
There’s at least one phone call made that could lead somewhere and the rest would pretty much come from geofencing.no way this dude had anything other than a dumb burner phone with nothing on it whatsoever. No saved contacts. We haven't heard anything because there's nothing to crack on the phone.
IMO his pulled down black face mask gives the appearance of a feminized jawline which I think isn’t there without the mask pulled downYou’re right. I can sort of see why people are saying it looks like he could be female based on the one shot from the side angle view, but the second cctv shot image where he’s more head on, you can make out his slight dark stubble and there’s nothing feminine looking about him.
It's just as plausible he wanted to stand out and be memorable at the conference he was there to attend.True or not, this is a very plausible scenario. That bright blue jacket continues to gnaw at my unconscious. Of course, I'm nowhere near any corporate executives, yet I always imagine them in suits of black, deep navy, or shades of grey.
EDIT: In his official UHC photo, he appears to be wearing a casual, navy blue zippered jacket. That may have been intentional to portray a gosh-gee-willikers-I'm-just-like-you sort of image as opposed to one in a $5K tailored suit.
MOO.
I think it can be pretty difficult. I remember in the 2015 Sacramento mass shooting it took them like 4 months to get into the phone, unsuccessfully sued Apple for help getting into it, and it was an iPhone 5C - let alone now when you can have a much longer or character-based password.What kind of phone would it be that they took so long to break into?
Even the newest iPhones with the most up to date iOS wouldn’t take long.
There’s at least one phone call made that could lead somewhere and the rest would pretty much come from geofencing.
Corporate America does not have one single look and feel anymore. They don’t all look like they came out of a scene in Mad Men with dark suits and briefcases.True or not, this is a very plausible scenario. That bright blue jacket continues to gnaw at my unconscious. Of course, I'm nowhere near any corporate executives, yet I always imagine them in suits of black, deep navy, or shades of grey.
EDIT: In his official UHC photo, he appears to be wearing a casual, navy blue zippered jacket. That may have been intentional to portray a gosh-gee-willikers-I'm-just-like-you sort of image as opposed to one in a $5K tailored suit.
MOO.
During the search in Central Park, police found a TJMaxx bag that appeared to contain clothes, although they have not yet confirmed that it belonged to the suspect.10 days, you’d think he would have more then the clothes on his back.
Agreed. They would just initiate another hack/release some sensitive info. Do something "techy" not a murder on the streets of NY. MOONot at all likely scenario.
Ransomware groups are pretty hands off. They don’t need to interact physically with any of the victims and would avoid doing so at all costs!
Tech has evolved since then! It takes way less than that now, even without Apple helping out.I think it can be pretty difficult. I remember in the 2015 Sacramento mass shooting it took them like 4 months to get into the phone, unsuccessfully sued Apple for help getting into it, and it was an iPhone 5C - let alone now when you can have a much longer or character-based password.
It is semi-interesting that in the video of the actual killing, the shooter is seen stepping up to the sidewalk from the street. He came up from behind one of those ubers that was waiting on the curb. So he wasn't hanging out on the sidewalk next to the Hilton and stepping out from there to shoot. He was either across the street and hurriedly crossed over when he saw BT or when he saw BT coming he crouched behind some cars in the street and came out and shot him. With drivers in those cars I don't think he would do that.I don’t see how it makes a difference which exit BT left his hotel from, as the shooting was just when he was about to enter the other hotel, the Hilton, where the conference was taking place. The shooter had been loitering at the front of the Hilton since ~5:41am, so would have seen BT arriving, no matter which exit BT used to leave the other hotel a couple of minutes earlier.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.