I agree, but I get the feeling Patsy's supporters take that type of arrogance as Patsy triumphing over the media and the crooked, inept police and all of the rumor and allegations, presenting a strong and and resistant image of dignity, proof of her civility and graciousness and fortitude -all while weeping and crying victim of some intruding killer that framed her (showing just enough emotion to display her tender and vulnerable side.)
It's like this - "Even though they chased after her and accused her til the day she died, she still lived a wonderful life full of happiness and comfort many of us only dream of - you think she was involved in her daughter's death or knew what happened and/or who did it? You're just JEALOUS of Patsy and how rich and sophisticated and popular she was! She COULD NOT have been involved or have known what happened! Wealthy Christian women with opulent homes and beautiful children and loving husbands in stable marriages with no problems whatsoever simply do NOT do things like this! Someone came in and killed JB and now we have to figure out if it was LHP or FW or Santa and Mrs McReynolds even though they've all been cleared and the Ramseys haven't!"
IMO, it's really too bad the people I'm sarcastically stereotyping there don't realize they haven't described the real Patsy Ramsey, but the person she wanted everyone to think she was. I'm simply amazed by how many people cling to the facade the Rs painted despite how many chinks in the veneer they need to make excuses for, and how outlandish they have to make those excuses. Now the killer worked in a pineapple factory, and the years of working with pineapple destroyed his fingerprints - so that's why the Rs can't account for the pineapple as well as why there are no fingerprints from the killer where they should be. I laffed good and hard - and they really think that sounds more plausible than "the pineapple was already in the house and JonBenet was awake that night to eat some."