- Joined
- Aug 6, 2016
- Messages
- 254
- Reaction score
- 1,814
Above article states federal crime scene investigators are there.That didn’t occur to me until you wrote it. There’s been no mention of the FBI
Above article states federal crime scene investigators are there.That didn’t occur to me until you wrote it. There’s been no mention of the FBI
I didn't mean for you to think my response to your post was directed at you. My bad for not saying something like 'jumping off your post'.I understand that but to me a family abduction has no threat to the rest of the community. With the arrests in this case (although we don’t know what for) I presume this is a “familial” type case.
Maybe “remain vigilant” means something different to him that it does me. Maybe he just means “keep your eyes open” for Elijah. To me it means, “stay aware to protect yourself or loved ones”. To Merriam-Webster vigilant means- : alertly watchful especially to avoid danger.
Snipped for focus.The FBI is assisting both local and state authorities with resources. Schmidt asked what kind of resources and they say it’s confidential at this time.
![]()
Amber Alert: Mother of missing Two Rivers boy and another man in custody; search reaches day three
Three-year-old Elijah Vue of Two Rivers is still missing. He’s the center of an Amber Alert issued on Tuesday afternoon.www.wbay.com
Same. I’m trying to figure out what kind of resources would be confidential?? It’s a new phrase for me.*oh, I get it now:Snipped for focus.
Is it common to keep resources confidential in a missing person's case? I'm trying to imagine what investigators would gain by doing that.
You know LEOs will keep information from the public in a murder case, information only the killer or someone who spoke with the killer would know?Is it common to keep resources confidential in a missing person's case? I'm trying to imagine what investigators would gain by doing that.
That makes sense but in your example, would an abandoned building be considered a resource? I wouldn't think so. I'd think their resources would be various agencies, government or otherwise. I'm trying to figure out which agencies they'd prefer to be kept close to their vest. We already know the FBI is on the case. Maybe child services is one they aren't talking about? Perhaps cadaver dogs? *scratches my head in puzzlement*You know LEOs will keep information from the public in a murder case, information only the killer or someone who spoke with the killer would know?
I think this would work the same way. They don't want the people they think are responsible knowing they are on their tail. For example, a LEO might say, "Don't tell the media we're looking at this abandoned building on 8th street."
That would be my first guess, and if they were utilizing horseback searchers that would indicate they are looking a wooded area somewhere (which would imply looking for a body instead of a living child).Perhaps cadaver dogs? *scratches my head in puzzlement*
"There’s a blue tent that is set up in part of the landfill with an excavator nearby.
Well that is not a very good sign but it is as many if not most here suspect.
And there ya go, folks. This is likely what LE has been holding close to the vest. Not sure it would hamper their investigation though. How depressing.
Aaaaand he was "last seen" at 8:00 AM not reported missing until approximately 11:00 AM. How interesting.This is really bad. Trash day was Tuesday morning for that complex.
What I'm wondering is was he last seen alive? I think that's an assumption a lot of people would make. I know I did. But then I thought... it doesn't necessarily mean he was seen alive. He could have been seen deceased and being carried out of the house. That would still make their statement "last seen" true.Aaaaand he was "last seen" at 8:00 AM not reported missing until approximately 11:00 AM. How interesting.