Search results

Maybe she is reading the posts here and got edified.

This was a wonderful day for ELEPHANTS.

Love the alliteration. :great:

Whoa,that was a chiller.

Thank you thank you

I know this has been covered before, and I apologize for my ignorance, but where can I find a complete set of the photos found on the camera memory card that JA used to document her depravity?

I would love to hear your story. About your wonderful teacher, or whatever story you choose to share.

I would like to add my thanks and admiration to KCL and BB and to you PASA and many other posters ... This is a great board and wonderful "neighborhood" to visit.

My sympathy to the attorney and his or her family on their loss. During such a difficult time this must be even harder to bear.

Can I come to dinner? Maybe my dear hubby will make me something good since I have Important Business!

:great::great::great::great: Welcome!

I don't think she even understands why she lies, it's pathological lying "pseudologica phantastica" she even lacks the capacity to understands that the lies ultimately are detrimental. And when she is cornered by one of her lies, she lies some more. Interesting animal.:waitasec:

I don't care too much for Nurmi or his style, but his client is the one who came up with the false pedophilia claims. What you state would clearly be misconduct, and probably even Crimean. So no! Nurmi did not originate the lie. JA is a pathological lier, it is what she does.

Great post, I have in fact met more manipulative, if not downright sociopathic, women than men. Some interesting studies have been done on the evil that people do to one another, especially under the guise of authority. Your posts are always well phrased and thought out. Wish I was as erudite.

Yes,I am disappointed in BK. She seemed to know the scoop on this earlier. On a wholly minor note, did she not also publicly "correct" JA de-edify with dis-edify? I may be slow, but I cannot find any dictionary that lists dis-edify as a word either.

Why cornrows, this seems to be an implied prejudice. But maybe I am just sensitive. :moo:

Unlike the CA trial where the "testimony" was provided by the defense attorney with no corroboration and was given credence by the jury...unbelievable.

I could feel your pain in your post, blessings to you.

Welcome aboard!

Great post, but I have to ask ... Why did you marry her?