LE serves search warrant on family home #4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
When my kids were babies, we had so many pacifiers, I doubt I would know if one was missing. I used to find them under the crib, couch cushions etc. Maybe Lisa only had 1?

When one grandchild stayed with us recently, we found 6 pacifiers for 1 baby. So I know what you mean. :)

imo
 
Elizabeth Smart's sister was only 9, but she was able to come up with the correct suspect months later, so I am not so sure.


I really hope the children are seeing a crisis type specialist..
 
And, also, NO ONE knows what LE said to DB in the interviews except those who were there. DB said that she was "shown" burnt clothes, not that they were "baby clothes" and they were not thrown in front of her.

How do you think this may have happened?
 
mitchweber Mitch Weber
The vehicle the parents of #lisairwin left in this morning around 11 just returned to the house on Walrond w/o parents pic.twitter.com/JtnroiJN

http://twitter.com/#!/mitchweber

This was 3 hours ago, but I didn't even know they left today.


Help me here curiousc, :) who was driving the car if the parents didn't return in it? tia
 
Help me here curiousc, :) who was driving the car if the parents didn't return in it? tia

The same lady that took them to the law firm individually yesterday. She must work for the law firm.:twocents:
 
Help me here curiousc, :) who was driving the car if the parents didn't return in it? tia

There was a pic in that tweet. Looks like some blonder haired lady was getting out of her vehicle....perhaps a family member.

So, where are the parents now? That's my question. LOL
 
How would anyone know what happened unless you were there?

Maybe I should have thrown "IMO" in there some where (my post was understandable, I'm sure). I suppose it's possible that LE coddled her over those 10 (or whatever) hours. Gently sat down some burnt clothing. Do you recognize these sweetie?

I doubt it. Investigations don't work that way. This LE agency is doing some public talking like I've never seen before.
 
Maybe I should have thrown "IMO" in there some where (my post was understandable, I'm sure). I suppose it's possible that LE coddled her over those 10 (or whatever) hours. Gently sat down some burnt clothing. Do you recognize these sweetie?

I doubt it. Investigations don't work that way. This LE agency is doing some public talking like I've never seen before.

I actually think they have been extremely closed lipped.
 
Maybe I should have thrown "IMO" in there some where (my post was understandable, I'm sure). I suppose it's possible that LE coddled her over those 10 (or whatever) hours. Gently sat down some burnt clothing. Do you recognize these sweetie?

I doubt it. Investigations don't work that way. This LE agency is doing some public talking like I've never seen before.

<modsnip> They have said virtually nothing the whole time.
 
And that's exactly what these parents are allowing and have given their full consent for LE to come and go as much and as often as they like..Parents have willingly given LE unfettered access to their home, property, vehicles and everything they own within those areas.. INCLUDING ALL THREE OF ALL OF THEIR CHILDREN's BELONGINGS, CLOTHES, AND KEEPSAKES!!

respectfully snipped :p

Not exactly true SO.:seeya: During one of LE's pressers- held by Capt. (Cutie) no less, the Capt himself said the parents did not allow them (LE) to continue searching the entire back yard. It is linked here and was one of the very first pressers. When this family stopped cooperating with LE, AFAIK, there were no more searches-at least for a few days.

FWIW, It was awfully convenient for the babies parents to claim they couldn't go back into the house because they were distraught/././././././././././././././././.especially after LE spent 16ish hours searching everything.

imo
 
I found a pre-screening tool for the FNS SNAP Program. http://www.snap-step1.usda.gov/fns/

I had to make quite a few assumptions. I plugged in 5 fake names and put in the ages of all involved. Well, I put in 28 for JI because I don't remember how old he is but that shouldn't make a difference. I used $43,000 as the annual salary for earned income, $250/ month for unearned income in child support. I used $850/ month for the mortgage (including insurance and taxes.) InDaMiddle, does that sound about right for that area? I did a mortgage calculator with a mortage of $110,000 but I don't know if JI had a downpayment or if he has refinanced, taken out a 2nd mortgage, etc... The short of it is, with my inputs, it showed that they would not be eligible for food stamps. lol

So, the short of it is, there is a high probability that they qualify for WIC but not for food stamps. I like solving easy little mysteries. :woohoo: :great:
 
Not only DB said she isn't allowing LE to re-interview the two boys, she said she herself isn't going to talk to them about the noises they heard. I find that particularly bizarre. It's her baby that is missing after all. She admits she was drunk and her recollection appears to be fuzzy (to say the least). The two boys were not drinking. One would think under these circumstances a mother would be talking and talking to the 6 and 8 year old to figure out what they heard/seen. But in this case one would be wrong.

Daum sure is bizarre. Just one more thing that points to the mother's involvement. If a normal person's baby was missing, IMO they'd beg their children to talk to LE, a therapist, any professional who could help the boys recall information about that night.
NOO this mom announces in front of God and everybody that she was drunk that night and blacked out and other such garbage.....:banghead:...............Not buying it for a second.

imo
 
Respectfully...the parents themselves in their interviews have contradicted part of what you have said above. There has been not one single public statement that they gave LE complete access to their house whenever and however they wanted. DB and JI said themselves that they do not want their children re-interviewed. It isn't the media giving us this information, it's the parents.

Everytime I see your name, I start singing a song with those fabulous words.

And to that I'll add, I agree with what you said.

imo
 
<modsnip> They have said virtually nothing the whole time.

They have come out publicly saying the parents are refusing to cooperate. The parents have never stopped cooperating, they needed a break after hours of being interrogated and accused and are still cooperating.

LE was/is using the media/public to put pressure on these people without a bit of a reason why.
 
respectfully snipped :p

Not exactly true SO.:seeya: During one of LE's pressers- held by Capt. (Cutie) no less, the Capt himself said the parents did not allow them (LE) to continue searching the entire back yard. It is linked here and was one of the very first pressers. When this family stopped cooperating with LE, AFAIK, there were no more searches-at least for a few days.

FWIW, It was awfully convenient for the babies parents to claim they couldn't go back into the house because they were distraught/././././././././././././././././.especially after LE spent 16ish hours searching everything.

imo

i have looked and relooked at early interviews. i can't find where the parents did not allow LE to keep searching the back yard. if anyone can help this doofus out, please put me out of my misery!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
2,991
Total visitors
3,121

Forum statistics

Threads
603,392
Messages
18,155,729
Members
231,717
Latest member
Nat Dru
Back
Top