UK - Lucy Letby Trial - Media, Maps & Timeline *NO DISCUSSION*

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Tuesday November 29th 2022 -

Tweets https://twitter.com/MrDanDonoghue

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 31 of Prosecution Evidence

Child A, Child B and Child E


Expert witness Professor Sally Kinsey is now giving evidence. She was approached by Cheshire Police to review the files of several babies in this case. Prof Kinsey is a retired Consultant Paediatric Haematologist

Today Prof Kinsey will deal with reports she prepared on the deaths of Child A, B and E

Before getting into Prof Kinsey's expert reports, the jury are being given summaries of Child A and B's birth (they were twins) and subsequent care/treatment. Jury heard this in fuller detail in October

Prof Kinsey is explaining that Child A and B's mother had a rare auto-immune disease. She is asked whether this could have been a significant factor in the death of Child A

In short, Prof Kinsey explains that the condition can cause clotting in the mother, premature birth and danger to unborn child. But she says in this case the condition did not pass to the children and it was not a factor in the death of Child A

Asked whether she agreed with the conclusion that Child A had died as a result of an air embolism (injection of air) Prof Kinsey says that the descriptions of purple/blue/red patches on the baby had "cemented" her view

She told the court that she had not seen air embolis in her practical experience, only in medical literature, but said the skin discolurations were a 'pretty stark description of what sounded to be air embolis to me'

Asked if there could be any other haematological explanation for the child's collapse, she says there is 'no evidence of that at all'

We're now on Child E, jury again being given a summary of the infant's birth and subsequent treatment

Last week the jury heard that Child E lost 25% of his blood volume in what was described as a "catastrophic haemorrhage". Asked about this bleed, Prof Kinsey said: 'This was spontaneous bleeding with no explanation'

Prof Kinsey is now talking the jury through various diagrams which show how the body's air/blood circulation system works
 
Tuesday November 29th 2022 - Chester Standard updates from the trial


Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 31 of Prosecution Evidence


Professor Sally Kinsey, Prosecution Expert Witness,

Retired Consultant Paediatric Haematologist (Blood Expert) Re: Air Embolus / Emboli

2:16pm

The trial is now resuming following a lunch break.
Professor Kinsey is explaining, via diagrams, how the blood is pumped through the heart.
She is now explaining an embolus, which is something which "shouldn't be there" in the body.
It is most commonly found from a blood clot which has broken off, and an embolus gets stuck in the blood vessel, causing damage.
She adds there are other types of emboli, such as a fat embolus, or embolic conditions which can cause a stroke or heart attack.

2:20pm

Mr Johnson asks if air is injected into the system via a syringe, what would happen.
Prof Kinsey explains the heart would be pumping, and the air bubbles would be broken into larger and tiny bubbles. The lungs would be able to cope with the smaller air bubbles, but the lungs would struggle with the larger air bubbles.
In babies, air bubbles would be going in the arterial circulation - blood returning to the heart passing straight out again without being oxygenated through the lungs.
This would lead to the changes in skin colour - a 'fluctuating' colour pattern, and would, the court hears, lead to the types of sin discolourations as described by doctors and nurses so far in the trial.

2:23pm

The court hears, in adults, the air bubbles would go to the lungs, if not blocked. If the bubbles are blocked, it could cause a pulmonary embolism.
In babies, there is a section of the heart, called the oval foramen, which would still be open, meaning the air bubbles would go to the arterial circulation.
The air bubbles would be absorbed by the haemoglobin, causing skin discolourations which move around the body and a mixture of blue, pink and purple discolouration, Mr Johnson summarises. Professor Kinsey agrees.

Cross-Examination

2:26pm

Ben Myers KC, for Letby's defence, is now asking Prof Kinsey questions.
He says his questions are more concerned on the nature of an air embolus.
For the haematology, he asks for Child E, whether it is a general point that such a child would not develop the levels of blood clotting as you would see in a more developed child or adult. Prof Kinsey agrees.
Asked about the 'no explanation for spontaneous bleeding', Mr Myers says if that is from a haematological reason. Prof Kinsey agrees.
Mr Myers says that does not rule out the possibility Child E had a gastro-intestinal haemorrhage. Prof Kinsey agrees.

2:29pm

Mr Myers asks about the principle of experts giving evidence, and their areas of expertise.
He refers to Prof Kinsey's expertise in haematology and certain paediatric specialisms, and her reports. They include focus on cancers and blood disorders.
Mr Myers: "Air embolus does not feature in your expertise, does it?"
Prof Kinsey: "No."

2:33pm

Mr Myers refers to the diagrams of gas exchange, which are 'standard images' in the way gas exchange works in the body.
Mr Myers: "In no way are they designed to explain an air embolus."
Prof Kinsey: "They were produced to explain the gas exchange and circulation."
Mr Myers: "What you are doing in your evidence is to take that understanding of circulation and gas exchange and use it to explain how an air embolus is displayed."
Prof Kinsey: "Yes."

2:42pm

Mr Myers says Prof Kinsey has, at times, commented on the issue of air embolus in her reports for Childs A, B and E.
Prof Kinsey: "Only in the changes to the colour of the skin, very impactful."
Mr Myers refers to the summary/opinion for Child A, and whether there was any haematological significance for Child A. He says that is not in dispute.
He refers to the conclusion, which he says relies on comment from [medical experts] Dr Dewi Evans and Dr Sandie Bohin, and the description from [Countess of Chester Hospital consultant] Dr Ravi Jayaram of the skin discolouration for Child A.
Mr Myers refers to the 1989 medical journal review: "mentioning a particular case - 'blanching and migrating areas of cutaneous pallor were noted in several cases and, in one of our own cases, we noted bright pink vessels against a generally cyanosed...background."
Prof Kinsey confirms she is drawing a parallel between the 1989 journal review and what had been observed by doctors and nurses.
She tells the court she was "shocked" by Dr Jayaram's description of skin discolouration for Child A, which she said came before she had considered the possibility of air embolus.
She said she knew this is what air embolus was like, and knew from her own education, before seeing that description matched what was said in the 1989 medical journal review.

2:45pm

Mr Myers says Dr Jayaram's clinical note - 'legs noted to look very white and pale before cardiac arrest' does not contain the full details from her report. Dr Jayaram did not add anything further to the skin discolouration observation in the report to the coroner, Mr Myers adds.
Mr Myers: "The description you read came from his statement [to police] two and a half years later."
Prof Kinsey agrees.

2:53pm

Mr Myers refers to the case of Child B, and the summary/opinion Prof Kinsey made in her report.
He says, for air embolus, Prof Kinsey again draws parallels between the 1989 medical journal and the skin discolouration observations seen for Child B.
The clinical note of 'widespread purple discolouration with white patches' for Child B, made at the time, is shown to the court, along with a subsequent 'improvement in skin perfusion'.
A doctor's note on June 10, shown to the court: 'suddenly purple blotching of body all over...upon my arrival purple blotching...[later] purple discolouration almost resolved'.
Lucy Letby's note on June 10 is also shown to the court: 'Cyanosed in appearance...colour changed rapidly to purple blotchiness with white patches'.
Mr Myers: "In none of those is there any description of a bright pink or red feature?"
Prof Kinsey: "No."

2:59pm

Prof Kinsey's report, dated November 1, 2022, is referred to.
Mr Myers says Prof Kinsey was asked to give further consideration as to how an air embolism worked.
She says she was asked to give further explanation on the features of an air embolism. She said she was not an expert in such mechanisms, but has provided an explanation.
Mr Myers says the report notes there is very little medical literature in relation to air emboli.
Mr Myers: "You have used your knowledge of blood and circulation to assist this?"
Prof Kinsey: "Yes."
Mr Myers says part of the limited medical literature relates to decompression in deep-sea divers, colloquially known as 'the bends', and that in those circumstances, nitrogen bubbles would be in the circulation longer than oxygen bubbles. He asks Prof Kinsey if that is the case.
Prof Kinsey: "I don't know the answer to that question."

3:04pm

Mr Myers says the research paper in question [for 'the bends'] dealt with four overweight deep-sea diving adults.
Prof Kinsey: "Yes, there were many limitations to their findings."
Mr Myers said the results were "very specific based to the people [in that study]."
Mr Myers asks if the symptoms of decompression sickness would always result in skin discolouration. Prof Kinsey said it would not.
Mr Myers asks if that can be applied to babies - if an air embolus could always lead to skin discolouration observations. Prof Kinsey said it would not.

3:07pm

Prof Kinsey says the problem with decompression syndrome, in comparison to air embolus in infants, is the bubbles get larger as the deep-sea diver returns to the surface.
Mr Myers says that is another limitation of the available medical literature for air emboli.
Prof Kinsey says the reason that study was used in her report was that skin discolouration had been an observation in that study, as it had been in cases of air embolus.

3:08pm

Prof Kinsey says the scale of the air embolus problem would depend on the size of the air bubble and the type of vessel that it is in.

Judge's Question

3:10pm

Upon a question from the judge, Prof Kinsey says she has never encountered any discussion about nitrogen bubbles in the system, other than in deep-sea divers.
She says the biggest factors for any air embolus would be the size of the air bubble and the vessel that it is in.
What was not a factor in her discussions was the quantities that made up the air [ie what amount was nitrogen, what amount was oxygen, carbon dioxide, etc].




LIVE: Lucy Letby trial, Tuesday, November 29
 
Tuesday November 29th 2022 -

Tweets https://twitter.com/MrDanDonoghue

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 31 of Prosecution Evidence

Professor Sally Kinsey - Air Embolus / Emboli



Cross-Examination

Ms Letby's defence lawyer Ben Myers KC is now cross examining Prof Kinsey. He puts it to her that her comments on Child E 'does not assist with what the cause of death actually was', to which she agrees

Mr Myers is now quizzing the expert on her conclusions around air embolus. She told the court earlier, that in the case of Child A, the rashes observed were 'a pretty stark description of what sounded to be air embolus to me'

Prof Kinsey says she had an 'intake of breath' when she saw the description of the rash on Child A as she knew that to be symptoms of air embolus.

Mr Myers points out that the description she is referring to came from a statement Dr Jayaram made to Police two and half year's after the death of Child A, not from his clinical note recorded at the time
 
Tuesday November 29th 2022 - Chester Standard updates from the trial


-----

Day 31 of Prosecution Evidence

(Twin) Child F

Ian Allen, CoCH, Pharmacy Re. TPN nutrition bags


3:14pm

The next witness to give evidence is Ian Allen, who worked in the Countess of Chester Hospital's pharmacy department in summer 2015.
Simon Driver, prosecuting, asks about the responsibilities Mr Allen had, which involved quality assurance and production of TPN bags for the neonatal unit.

3:16pm

Mr Driver focuses on the TPN bags, and a video which has been produced for the benefit of the court showing how a TPN bag is made.
Mr Allen confirms he has seen the video.
He describes the types of TPN nutrition bags - one would be used for the baby's first two days of life, and the other would be a maintenance 'stock' bag, supplied to the unit through the department.

3:20pm

Mr Allen says the initial order would be faxed down to the pharmacy from the neonatal unit. It would be handed to a pharmacist, reviewed by them, processed into a worksheet [a set of instructions on how to make the bag and the ingredients needed to make it].
A label would be generated.
A member of the pharmacy team would gather the ingredients/quantities required. Every medicine would come with a batch sheet number as part of the 'assembly'.
"Every step in the process has a standard operating procedure"
Staff would be trained in the process through nationally recognised quality assurance, he tells the court.

3:25pm

The items would be sprayed and wiped to sterilise them, and then made in a controlled environment.
Two operators would make the bag, with checks in place confirming the identity and quantity of the ingredients.

3:28pm

A pharmacist would check what has been used, looking at empty vials and ampoules to confirm what has been used.
The pharmacist would be ultimately reponsible for the product.
The unit would be subject to regulatory monitoring to ensure the safety, quaity and effectiveness of the products.


3:31pm

The video explaining how a TPN bag is made at the pharmacy department is played to the court for the second time - it was first shown on Monday.
The prosecution say they may intervene at various points in the video to ask Mr Allen questions about what is shown to the court.

4:00pm

Mr Allen is now demonstrating how a TPN bag and its connectors work - which does have a connector which can be opened.


4:02pm

The empty TPN bag and its connectors are now being passed around members of the jury and the defence for examination.

4:06pm

Mr Driver is asking Mr Allen about how a quantity of liquid could be added to one of the ports, which is shown to be possible.

4:10pm

The court is shown a nutrition prescription for Child F for August 4.
Mr Allen confirms he is familiar with the type of prescription shown, and the worksheet which is also shown to the court.
He said this particular TPN would have followed the standard protocols in the pharmacy, and was reflective of the prescription.
He said the bag would have been transferred from the pharmacy to the neonatal unit fridge.

4:14pm

A copy of the label for that TPN bag on August 4 would have been made for the pharmacy's records.
The label has a use-by date of August 11, to be stored between 2-8 degrees C.

4:18pm

The August 4 TPN bag did not have lipids prescribed on the prescription. Mr Allen said such lipids would have been prescribed separately.
Mr Driver asks 'Would there be insulin?' for the TPN bags.
Mr Allen: "No, there would never be insulin prescribed in these bags."
Mr Driver asks how would that [insulin prescription for a baby] be done?
Mr Allen: "...by separate syringes."

Cross-Examination

4:25pm

Ben Myers KC, for Letby's defence, rises to clarify one matter on the TPN bag, which had an expiration date of seven days.
He says normally, TPN bags could last for up to two months, but once the extra items are added to the prescription, the expiration would be reduced.
Mr Allen: "That's correct."
The court hears the stability of the bag is reduced.

Judge's Questions

Mr Allen explains, upon questions from the judge, there would be nothing added by a pharmacist other than trace vitamins. The TPN bag would contain components such as 10% dextrose.
The judge asks about the storage of the TPN bags.
Mr Allen says there would be a stock level of TPN bags - they would be 'off-the-shelf' bags and a number would be stored in the pharmacy, and a smaller number would be stored in the unit's refrigeration area.

4:28pm

Members of the jury are reminded by the judge, having heard a lot of expert evidence in the case today, not to conduct any independent research.

LIVE: Lucy Letby trial, Tuesday, November 29
 
Wednesday November 30th 2022 - no Chester Standard live updates

Tweets https://twitter.com/MrDanDonoghue

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 32 of Prosecution Evidence

(Twin) Baby F

Yvonne Griffiths, CoCH, Neonatal Unit Manager Re. Insulin and TPN stocks

I'm at Manchester Crown Court again today covering the murder trial of nurse Lucy Letby. We're expecting to hear from medical experts this morning in relation to Child F, who the Crown say was poisoned with insulin by Ms Letby in August 2015

Yvonne Griffiths, who is a neonatal unit manager at the Countess of Chester, is first in the witness box today. She's giving evidence on Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) bags and how they are stored at the hospital

The jury are being shown a photo of the treatment room at the Countess of Chester where medicines and kit was stored. Ms Griffiths is explaining that there was one set of keys for a refrigerator that stored controlled drugs

She says that there wasn't a system for accessing the fridge, if a nurse needed anything they would just ask for the key

Jury is now being shown images of the inside of the fridge, Ms Griffiths says insulin was stored in there

A medicines requisition booklet from summer 2015 is now being shown to the court - this was used by nurses to request more stock.

We're being shown an entry from June which shows there was a request for a babiven maintenance bag

Cross-Examination

Ms Letby's defence lawyer Ben Myers KC is now questioning the witness. It's clarified that the treatment room wasn't locked and was open to doctors and nurses 24/7
 
Last edited:
Wednesday November 30th 2022 - no Chester Standard live updates

Tweets https://twitter.com/MrDanDonoghue

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 32 of Prosecution Evidence

(Twin) Baby F

Nurse Kate Bramall, CoCH, Neonatal Unit Re. Insulin and TPN



Neonatal nurse Kate Bramall has just been in the witness box. She was on shift when a TPN bag was delivered to the unit for Child F.

She was asked if she had ever added anything to a bag.

'No, it's not something we do', she said.



Asked if she had ever added insulin to a bag, she said :'No never'

She explained insulin is administered through a separate syringe



Another Neonatal Nurse on duty at CoCH


Another nurse, who was also on shift, has just been asked the same questions. She again said she had never added anything to a TPN bag



Nurse Cheryl Cuthbertson-Taylor, CoCH

Another nurse, Cheryl Cuthbertson-Taylor, has just been asked the same questions. Again she told the court she had never added anything to a TPN bag



Nurse Valerie Thomas, CoCH


Another nurse, Valerie Thomas, is in the witness box and is again being asked the same questions. She says she has never administered a TPN bag to a child or added anything to a bag



Simon Wood, CoCH, Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist

A statement from Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Simon Wood is now being read to the court. He helped to carry out the C-Section on the mother of Child E and F. He said the twins were 'born in good condition'
 
Last edited:
Wednesday November 30th 2022 - no Chester Standard live updates

Tweets https://twitter.com/MrDanDonoghue

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 32 of Prosecution Evidence

(Twin) Baby F

Dr Dewi Evans, Prosecution Expert Medical Witness



Expert medical witness Dr Dewi Evans returns to the witness box. He was asked to review the case by Cheshire Police and produced a number of reports on the events at the Countess of Chester

Dr Evans said there was 'only one explanation' for the 'astonishing' levels of insulin found in Child F's blood.

'These were very, very striking results. There's only one explanation for this, (Child F) had received insulin from some outside source', he said.

Dr Evans said he had concluded the drug had most likely been added to the baby's Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) bag, which is used to intravenously provide feeds to infants.

Ben Myers KC, defending, has no questions for Dr Evans on his evidence



Dr Sandie Bohin, Prosecution Expert Medical Witness

Medical expert Dr Sandie Bohin, who reviewed Dr Evans' findings, is now in the witness box.

She's asked if she agrees with Dr Evans that this was a case of insulin poisoning via TPN bag.

'Yes', she says

Again, Mr Myers has no questions for the witness. That concludes her evidence.
 
Wednesday November 30th 2022 - no Chester Standard live updates

Tweets https://twitter.com/MrDanDonoghue

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 32 of Prosecution Evidence

(Twin) Baby F

Claire Hocknell, Police Intelligence Analyst; Lucy Letby's Police Interviews



Police intelligence analyst Claire Hocknell is now in the witness box, she is taking the jury through sequencing evidence

A summary of Ms Letby's police interview, carried out in 2019, in relation to Child F is read to the court. In that interview Ms Letby denied adding insulin to a TPN bag

That's it for today and that concludes evidence related to Child F. Tomorrow the court will move on to Child G.
 
Lucy Letby trial: Baby ‘received two bags of poisoned feed’

10%

Mr Johnson said: “And secondly, it followed, given the blood sugar readings, that two bags must have been contaminated with insulin?”

Dr Bohin said: “Yes, if a new long line is inserted it would be usual practice to throw away the old bag of TPN, change the long line and put up a new bag which would mean insulin would need to have been in two bags.” [...]

She said: “‘Initially babies may become a little unwell, but if left untreated they could go on to have seizures, fall into a coma and subsequently die.
 
Thursday December 1st 2022 - Chester Standard live updates

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 33 of Prosecution Evidence

Baby G

Kate Tyndall Police Intelligence Analyst - Electronic evidence - sequence, hospital records & LL's texts
Birth May 2015, transfer to CoCH Aug 2015, and focus on 6th to 8th Sept 2015


9:06am

The jury have been told that today, the evidence will begin in the case of Child G.
A reminder that none of the children can be identified in this case, due to reporting restrictions.

9:13am

Previously in the trial, during the prosecution opening, prosecutor Nicholas Johnson KC told the jury there are three attempted murder charges in the case of Child G.
The prosecution say all three murder attempts happened in the neonatal unit in September 2015.

10:33am

The trial has now resumed, and the jury will be hearing the case of Child G, a baby girl.
Nicholas Johnson KC, for the prosecution, says intelligence analyst Kate Tyndall will first talk through the sequence of events, before a statement from the parents of Child G will be read out to the court.

10:38am

The court is first shown Lucy Letby's shift patterns for June 2015.
Mr Johnson says, for the indictment, the charges of murder and attempted murder for Childs A-F, Letby was on night shifts.
Letby was also on a night shift for September 6-7, the night Child G suffered a collapse. The prosecution say this was one of three murder attempts by Letby on Child G; the defence deny this.

10:41am

Child G was born on May 31, 2015, at Liverpool's Arrowe Park Hospital, at a gestational age of 23 weeks and six days. She weighed 535g - 1lb 2oz.
Previously, the court heard this baby was the most premature birth of all the babies in the trial.
She was in a poor condition at birth, requiring ventilation.

10:45am

She was cared for at Arrowe Park, a tertiary centre, until being transferred to the Countess of Chester Hospital on the night of August 13. At this stage she would have been a gestational age of 34 weeks plus 3 days.
Nursing notes for Child G on Friday, August 14, recorded by Caroline Bennion, note: 'Currently [Child G] is on CPAP Peep of 4 in 29-40% of oxygen...has been since 17/7/15 and has occasional desaturations. [Child G] is trialling off CPAP in ambient oxygen and manages 1 hour in 2 episodes daily. May be eligible to trial Optiflow.
'Fluids are all enteral feed.'
A further note: 'Mum intends to breast feed and is expressing well...first immunisations have been given on August 1.
'[Child G] has had metabolic bone disease but is not currently treated. Mum and dad have been shown around the unit and have been given contact numbers'.

10:48am

The court hears, from August 14 to September 6, Child G was treated at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit.
The next evidence presented to the jury will be from September 6 onwards.
At 2am on that day - when Child G was 99 days old - a feeding chart shows she was being fed with expressed breast milk, Gaviscon and a fortifier.

10:53am

The court is also shown a range of medications which were administered by Lucy Letby and another nurse, during that night, to Child G, before the handover at 7.30am.
For the day shift, the designated nurse for Child G was Vicky Blamire, who recorded hourly observations and was a co-signer for some of Child G's medication.
Consultant Dr Stephen Brearey records observations in an 11am clinical note.
It was noted that Child G's weight had increased, by this point, to 1.985kg (4lb 6oz).

10:56am

Vicky Blamire's note at 3.37pm records 'all safety equipment present and correct', and Child G continued to receive regular feeds.
Further prescribed medication is administered to Child G throughout the day.
Her note at 6.44pm records, for Child G, 'Another bottle completed this evening. Bowels now open'.

11:00am

The handover takes place for the night shift team at 7.30pm.
A different nurse to Lucy Letby - who cannot be named due to reporting restrictions - was the designated nurse for Child G this night.
Letby was the designated nurse for one baby in room 1.
The other nurse was the designated nurse for Child G in room 2, and another baby in a room whose location is unconfirmed on the chart.
There were a total of seven babies in the neonatal unit that night, being looked after by a total of five nurses.

11:03am

Lucy Letby was the co-signer for medication administrations for Child G, along with the designated nurse.
An observation chart for August 6 shows Child G's observations are made every three hours, with a heart rate in the 'normal' range at that stage.

11:07am

Letby had messaged colleague Kate Bissell at about 8.30pm enquiring about expressed breast milk for the baby she was the designated nurse for that night. The matter is clarified in the text conversation.

11:10am

Further medication is administered to Child G at 1.46am, signed by the designated nurse and Alisa Simpson.
At 2am, the designated nurse records observations for Child G and a neonatal feeding chart records this is Child G's 100th day since birth.
She received 45mls of milk via the nasogastric tube, with 'ph4' aspirates recorded. Child G was noted to be 'asleep' at this stage.
The milk was expressed breast milk, plus fortifier and Gaviscon.

11:13am

Lucy Letby writes a note, written in retrospect at 8.57am, where care of Child G was transferred to her following an 'event'.
The note says "written in retrospect for care given from 2am to present. [Child G] had large projectile milky vomit at 2.15am. Continued to vomit++. 45mls of milk obtained from NG tube with air++. Abdomen noted to be distended and discoloured. Colour improved few minutes after aspirating tube, remained distended but soft. Reg[istrar] Ventress asked to review. To go nil by mouth with IV fluids. Dr called to theatre."

11:15am

The designated nurse from the start of the shift records a note: 'nurse L Letby taken over care [of Child G] following vomit/apnoeic episode after 2am feed'.

11:16am

Dr Alison Ventress writes clinical notes, timed at 2.35am and written retrospectively at 4.40am.
They record: 'Called to r/v [Child G] urgently at 2.35am.
'Had very large projectile vomit (reaching chair next to cot + canopy). Abdo appeared discoloured purple and distended. [Child G] distressed and uncomfortable. Red in face and purple all over. [Oxygen] to 1L via nasal cannula...'

11:17am

Letby's note at 3am for Child G - 'bowels opened large green watery stool at 0300'.

11:19am

At 3.15am, Letby's note adds: 'Approx 0315 [Child G] had profound desaturation to 20%, marked colour loss with apnoea. Brady to 50s. Neopuffed in 100% oxygen, observations improved but [Child G] remained apnoeic. Drs arrived. Intermittently breathing/apnoea.
'Decision made to intubate. Moved to nursery 1...'

11:25am

Dr Ventress also noted Child G was planned to cannulate, with plan to administer fluids, but this was delayed due to the need to deliver another baby in the delivery room.
Later, she noted: 'called out of theatre to say [Child G] had gone apnoeic and dusky. Dr called in...
'On arrival sats 50% in oxygen. Receiving IPPV from nurse. Heart rate ok.
'Pink and well perfused with mask CPAP....[Child G] then had another profound apnoea and heart rate down to 70, sats 40%.'
The doctor adds Child G was then intubated, and 'IV vitamin K given due to blood from trachea'.
Mr Johnson says this is another case where a baby is bleeding at the mouth.
Dr Stephen Brearey noted: 'Called in at 0330...large vomit and loose watery stool earlier followed by desat and brady. Intubated by Dr Ventress on my arrival. A small amount of blood visible on intubation. Blood samples taken and sent...'good gas post intubation'.
At 3.45am, Child G's parents were notified by the former designated nurse.

11:27am

The blood sample for Child G is taken at 3.59am.
Lucy Letby records observations, a fluid balance and an intensive care chart for Child G at 4am.
The observations have gone, the the court hears, from every three hours, to every one hour.

11:30am

A blood gas record is shown for Child G, from August 14 to September 7. Lucy Letby has signed for the last of those records.
An x-ray of Child G is taken at 4.49am. Consultant radiologist Dr Amer Rehman records, for the abdomen, 'generally slightly distended bowel loops, but gas noted in rectum, no transition point, mural or free gas detected on balance'.

11:34am

Lucy Letby and Alisa Simpson are co-signers for medications for Child G at 5.15am, and for a neonatal infusion prescription at 5.30am.
Dr Alison Ventress notes, for 5.30am, 'approx 0530 had another profound desat, hr down ton 60 and sats to 40%. Taken off vent and IPPV neopuff via ETT.
'Recovered slowly but desat when back on vent ? ventilator problem so flow sensor changed + then whole ventilator changed'.
Dr Brearey also records Dr Ventress changed the ETT with 'less leak'.
Child G had 'one further brady and poor perfusion.'
Child G was sedated and 'will need discussion with Arrowe Park Hospital/Liverpool Women's Hospital'.
The parents were kept informed, the note adds.

11:37am

Dr Ventress notes, from 6.05am - 'profound desat to 40% + HR down to 80. Decision to reintubate. IPPV given via ETT initially. Heart rate 120 but sats remained 50% [despite increase in oxygen]
'ETT removed at 6.10am. Thick secretions ++ in mouth. Blood clot at end of ETT. IPPV via facemask given
'NG aspirated as abdo appeared v large ~100mls aspirated.
'Reintubated 0615 ETT with intubation drugs. Blood-stained fluid in oropharynx.
'Capnograph positive.'
The plan was to continue a series of medication, plus morphine, and keep parents updated.

11:39am

Lucy Letby noted: 'Reintubated at 0615 with intubation drugs...clear air entry and bilateral chest movement. Blood gases as charted...10% glucose commenced. Morphine running...[Child G] agitated and fighting ventilator. [Medication given]. Now synchronising well.'

11:40am

Medication is administered, with Lucy Letby being a co-signer along with Alisa Simpson.
Dr Rehman has a further x-ray report at 6.36am, comparing observations with the previous x-ray. Among his observations, he notes: 'Lungs with slightly improved appearances, probably reflecting improved inspiration.'

11:46am

The former designated nurse are written retrospectively at 7.49am.
For the night '[Child G] was being nursed in a Kanbed with moniroting...
'Feeds 180ml/kg 3x8 ebm with fortifier and Gaviscon via alternate bottle/NGT. Abdomen full but soft with no discolouration. Aspirates minimal, partial digested milk. Passed urine and bowels open++. Short period of straining/uncomfortable at start of night when having cuddles with dad. Dr Ventress aware.'
The note adds care was transferred to Lucy Letby following Child G's large milky vomit just after 2am.
The nurse adds, for family communication 'dad present for early part of night shift, had cuddles with [Child G]. Parents called by me approx 3.45am...arrived shortly after'.

Recap: Lucy Letby trial, Thursday, December 1
 
Thursday December 1st 2022 - Chester Standard live updates

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 33 of Prosecution Evidence

Baby G

Kate Tyndall Police Intelligence Analyst - Electronic evidence - sequence, hospital records & LL's texts
Birth May 2015, transfer to CoCH Aug 2015, and focus on 6th to 8th Sept 2015


11:57am

The trial is now resuming after a short break.

12:01pm

The care of Child G was then handed over to another designated nurse for the day shift on September 7.
Letby had written a note, retrospectively at 8.57am, recording what happened during the night shift: 'Abdomen appears less distended and soft. Bowels opened large green watery stool at 0300. Urine output...NG tube on free drainage...
'Blood noted beyond vocal cords during intubation.
'[Child G] having frequent profound desaturations on ventilator, requiring neopuff with high pressures and 100% oxygen, takes several minutes to recover.'

12:04pm

Dr David Harkness, in a clinical note at 9am, records Child G was 'paralysed and sedated, well perfused. [Abdomen] soft...
'Plan...discuss with tertiary centre [ie Arrowe Park/Liverpool Women's]'
Letby, at 9.15am: 'Parents attended the unit and have been fully updated...by myself, Reg Ventress and consultant Brearey. Anxious but understand need for ventilation.'
At 10am, Dr Harkness noted Child G's colour had 'improved'.

12:07pm

Lucy Letby sends a text message to a colleague in relation to the care of a different child on the neonatal unit from the previous night at 10.46am.

12:17pm

A longline is inserted into Child G at 3pm.

12:24pm

Dr Ravi Jayaram's clinical note at 3.30pm - 'spoke with consultant neonatologist at Arrowe. Agrees current management plan.'
Child G's observations are noted, with 'cool hands and feet', 'abdomen - distended but soft'.
The blood gases had raised metabolic acidosis.

12:36pm

A doctor's note at 4.30pm says Child G required a 2nd longline, and Child G 'remained unwell'.


12:46pm

The day-shift designated nurse's notes, at 8.13pm, include 'during [morning] handover required x2 eposdes of neopuff. Ventilation increased...
'BP deteriorated and cannula site became white. Moved to another cannula. BP again imrpoved. Drs trying to otain longline for better access...
'Chest clear and [blood gases] continue to be metabolic acidosis...
'Minimal urine output all day.'
The family communication says, for 8.51pm: 'Parents on unit throughout day and updated. Aware that BP is too low and IV access difficult. Understandable very upset and struggling to see her this poorly again.
'Have looked at 100-day cake, are trying to remain positive at this time...'

12:49pm

Medication for Child G continues into the night of September 7.
A consultant paediatrician said at 9.45pm, '[Arrowe Park Hospital consultant says] they are happy to accept [Child G there] - he will discuss with transport team.'
The call to the Arrowe Park transport team is made at 10.08pm.

12:56pm

The ambulance is booked at 10.43pm.
At 11pm, further observations are made for Child G.
Nurse Belinda Simcock records, at 11.35pm, a series of observations for child G, which include longlines, morphine administered and antibiotics.
The note adds 'infant to be transferred to Arrowe awaiting transport team'.

1:00pm

The transfer team arrived at the Countess of Chester Hospital at midnight.
A consultant paediatrician's clinical notes record Child G was still 'very sick', the court hears, despite the series of medications throughout the day.
More observations are made for Child G at 1am. At 1.05am on September 8, the transfer team noted Child G's abdomen was 'full and veiny'.

1:42pm

During the course of September 7, a number of text messages were exchanged between Lucy Letby and her colleagues.
One conversation began at 1.33pm from Jennifer Jones-Key, who messaged Letby: "How you doing x"
Letby replied: "Had rubbish nights. x"
Jones-Key: "Yeah gathered. x"
Letby: "Thought someone would have told you x
"Nothing else to say really, just hope they are both ok"
Jones-Key: "Don't know ins and outs as tried to avoid it, needed a break. Found Thursday horrendous, not really slept since then. Hope you're ok"
Letby: "That is understandable, won't tell you anything."
The conversation then turned to Letby asking which of the team had informed Jennifer Jones-Key about the events of the night-shift for September 6-7. After a few guesses, the name 'Ali', in the messages, is said to be correct.
Jones-Key: "Ali. She not having a good time x"
Letby: "No, I know. It's been awful for her but she's coped with it brilliantly and got back-up when needed etc x"
Jones-Key: "Yeah I don't know how she's done it. She was fab on Thursday..."

1:48pm

The daytime designated nurse for Child G is in a text cnversation with Lucy Letby for much of the afternoon on September 7, the court is told.
Much of the conversation relates to the condition of Child G, although messages are also exchanged in which the designated nurse is 'venting' about a number of colleagues, adding she was going to buy some sweets and eat them all to herself. Letby responded: "Absolutely, don't share", followed by an emoji of a face with its tongue sticking out.
The nurse added Child G's parents were "devastated but determined...thought that if she got to 100 [days] they could feel confident she would be fine."

1:50pm

Letby responded that, at the start of that night shift, the team had been sat at a desk "preparing a banner [for Child G's 100-day milestone]."
The nurse responded: "Yep. [Colleague] brought her cake in."

1:55pm

Later in the afternoon, the nurse messaged Letby that Child G's condition was still very poor.
Letby responds: "any idea what's caused in [sic]?"
The nurse responds, at 6.06pm, "Nope. Just seems to be a circulation collapse. Chest sounds clear."
Letby: "Hmm, what can cause that.
"Is it that she is an extreme premature who had long-term inotrope and vent dependency and now she is older and doing more for herself...it just takes a little...something to tip her over."
The nurse responds: "We are going with sepsis..."
Child G was noted to be looking "grim".

2:00pm

Letby had seen Child G that night on September 7, messaging the nurse at 10.56pm to say the baby girl "looks awful, doesn't she".
The nurse responds: "Yeah, going to APH [Arrowe Park Hospital]. On triple antibiotics."
Letby relays a blood gas reading for Child G to the nurse.
The nurse responds: "So no better. Damn" adding: "I have a bad feeling."
Letby messaged: "But at least going to where she is known."
"Just hope they get her there."
The nurse replies: "Hmmmmm not sure they will."
Letby: "On today of all days."
Letby added Child G was "declining bit by bit".

2:17pm

The sequence of events contniues to be talked through.
Belinda Simcock records nursing notes for 1.30am and 1.40am on September 8, written in retrospect at 5.19am.
The 1.40am note reads - 'Suctioned-nil from ETT, moderate amount thick white secretions obtained orally.'
An increase in the dose of adrenaline is made for Child G.
The transport team handover is formally made at 2.35am.
Child G leaves the Countess of Chester Hospital in an ambulance at 3am, to be transferred to Arrowe Park Hospital.
Belinda Simcock's note records that the parents were kept informed of the developments.
Alisa Simpson later messages Lucy Letby to say: "Hi Lucy. Just to let you know that [Child G] has successfully been transferred out at 3am athis morning to APH. She is stable and latest CBG [capilliary blood gas] has improved! Fingers crossed for her!"
Letby responds: "That is good news. Thanks for letting me know"
Child G was then treated at Arrowe Park Hospital between September 8 and September 16, 2015, before returning to the Countess of Chester Hospital.

2:22pm

The court is now shown a chart illustrating the neonatal unit's staff duties and who recorded/administrated what for September 6-7, 2015.
At a point between 2am and 3.30am, a different nurse takes over the care for what had been Lucy Letby's designated baby for that night shift.

2:27pm

The final chart shows Child G was moved from nursery room 2 to room 1 at 3.15am. One other baby was moved from room 1 to room 2 at 3.30am.

Recap: Lucy Letby trial, Thursday, December 1
 
Thursday December 1st 2022 - Chester Standard live updates

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 33 of Prosecution Evidence

Baby G

Baby G's Parent's Witness Statements - Agreed Evidence



Mother's Witness Statement

2:31pm

Philip Astbury is now reading the relevant parts of Child G's parents [statements]. The court hears this agreed evidence, and is not contested.
The first statement is Child G's mother.
"Things went ok" with the pregnancy until week 22, when she started bleeding. She was taken to hospital for checks.
At week 23, she was taken to Arrowe Park, as her waters had broken and she was having stomach aches.
She said she was struggling to sleep and went to the bathroom - she then gave birth to Child G.
She said she rang for the emergency, but it wasn't working. Someone in the next door heard, and went for help.
She said to medical staff: "Save [Child G]."
"She was only 1lb 2oz, a tiny little fighter.
"During our time at Arrowe Park, she showed doctors she was a fighter. She made good progress."
After a change of several cots, and at seven weeks, Child G was moved to the high-dependency unit and available for skin-to-skin contact.
By 12 weeks old - she was 'so well' she could go to Chester.

2:53pm

Child G turned 100 days old and Lucy Letby was looking after her that day.
"When we got to the hospital, she was in intensive care...it was such a shock and it looked like she was going to die."
Child G was taken back to Arrowe Park for nine days, before returning to Chester in the HDU.
Child G got sick again, and had to return to the intensive care unit.
She "looked different" - and after brain scans, it was said she would just be 'a little clumsy'.

3:00pm

The mum adds she had gone to get a coffee and when she went back to the high-dependency unit, Child G was "freaking out". Lucy Letby was there with another nurse.
She said she told them she wanted to hold Child G as that would calm her down, and did so.
Child G went to the intensive treatment unit that day.
There were three times, she aid, Child G was transferred to the ITU.
She said she would always ring the hospital twice a day - once at 6am and one at 7-8pm; the latter to find out who would be looking after the baby girl that night.
During the day, she would stay with Child G at the hospital.
When Child G came home in November 2015, at 156 days old, she had been left with quadraplegic cerebral palsy and was visually impaired, and was being fed by stomach, and nil by mouth.

3:04pm

In a second statement, she said she was asked about the feeding of Child G, and how she had been taught to feed her baby daughter via a syringe, in a way she did not receive too much milk too quickly.
She said sometimes she would be allowed to feed via the syringe, but Lucy Letby "always held the syringe" during feeding time.

Father's Witness Statement

3:08pm

A statement from Child G's father is read out to the court.
He said there had been concerns at week 9 of the pregnancy when the mother began bleeding, and they feared there might be a miscarriage. The mother was taken to the Countess of Chester Hospital where the baby was seen to be doing fine in a scan, and the mother stayed there until the bleeding stopped.
The mother began bleeding again later in the pregnancy and was transferred to Arrowe Park Hospital by ambulance. The father drove himself to the hospital.
He left the mother at the hospital at 8-9pm, and later received a phone call to say the mother had gone into labour and given birth.
He said he jumped into the car and drove to the hospital. Child G was 'stable' and the parents went to see her in the ITU. The mother had to be wheeled in.
The father says Child G was not due to give birth until September 21 and had "only a 5% chance of survival".

3:10pm

The father said Child G was "no bigger than your hand..[she] looked like a tiny person."
Child G was kept in for 11 weeks at Arrowe Park and although "they thought she was going to die", with her having "ups and downs" and underdeveloped lungs, she was "much more stable after a couple of weeks".
He said he only picked her up for the first time when she weighed 2lb, "as she was so small".

3:18pm

Child G had 'regular ultrasounds' to check for brain development, which showed no brain bleeds, and all scans showed "she was normal".
She was "stable enough" to be transferred to the Countess of Chester Hospital, in the HDU.
When there, the mother would ring twice a day, and stay at the neonatal unit during the day. The father said he would collect the mother at 5.30pm, they would go home for tea, then he would go back to the hospital until about 10-11pm.
He says he never saw anything in that time where a doctor or nurse was acting unprofessionally, nor did he have any concerns. There were "no problems" until Child G was 100 days old.

3:25pm

The father said on day 99, Child G required a low amount of oxygen for breathing assistance, had been fed and was "settled; she was fine when I left".
The parents got a phone call in the early hours of September 7 from a nurse to say Child G had vomited and aspirated. The nurse said there was "no need to rush", but the parents went to hospital "immediately".

3:29pm

When the parents arrived, they found a banner to celebrate Child G's 100 days had been made, and Child G was onto a ventilator in the ITU.
Child G was "just about stable", and they were told she had "projectile vomited".
This, the father said, Child G had "never done before", although she has done since, "several times". Child G was transferred to Arrowe Park Hospital in the early hours of September 8, and due to the time of admission, the parents stayed in the parents room.

3:32pm

After a couple of days at Arrowe Park Hospital, Child G was weaned off oxygen completely, which exceeded the expectations of the parents.
However, the father said, he "noticed something had changed about [Child G]."

3:45pm

He said while, prior to Child G's projectile vomiting incident, he would speak to her and she would smile in response. After the incident, he would speak to her, but she would not smile in response.
Child G was transferred back to the Countess of Chester Hospital and the father asked if there was a virus at the hospital, as another baby in the unit [Child I] was also poorly.
He said a consultant assured him "there was no virus" and "nothing wrong with the ward".

3:47pm

On a few occasions, Child G had to go back to the HDU, having appeared as if she was almost ready to leave when placed in nursery room 4.
On one occasion, he recalled the nursing staff were trying to recannulate Child G to give antibiotics, and the mum said to them "Let me hold her", and after she did, Child g calmed down.
"It seemed that every time she moved [to nursery room 4], something happened and she would be moved back to the HDU."

3:56pm

When Child G came home in November 2015, she weighed 5lb.
She remained stable at 18 months and 24 months, but "missed milestones".
At the age of two-and-a-half, she had an MRI, and it was only then that the parents "realised the true extent of her brain damage".
Child G required treatment at Alder hey Hospital and required numerous ventilations throughout 2018.
She was, at the time of the father's statement to police, 'nil by mouth', but was less prone to chest infections.
The Countess of Chester Hospital continued to treat Child G, who had quadraplegic cerebral palsy, Level 5 cerebral palsy which meant she would go "really stiff" and stop breathing.
The first time it happened, the parents believed she was having a tantrum, until they realised the lack of breathing was involuntary.
Child G was visually impaired and also being treated for microcephaly, where the head is smaller than it should usually be.
"We don't know what her life expectancy is," the father added.


Recap: Lucy Letby trial, Thursday, December 1
 
Thursday December 1st 2022 - Chester Standard live updates

Colour Code

Blue text - Lucy Letby's (Defendant's) texts and Facebook searches
Green text - Countess of Chester Hospital medical staff
Black text - Police/Intelligence Analysts evidence
Orange text - Medical expert witnesses
Purple text - Agreed Facts and Parents evidence



-----

Day 33 of Prosecution Evidence

Baby G

Dr Alison Ventress, Registrar, CoCH, Night Shift 6th/7th Sep 2015


3:59pm

Dr Alison Ventress is now recalled to give evidence.
She said she recalls "very little" from the night shift at September 6-7.
She says she did not see Child G vomiting that night.
She tells the court Child G 'looked better' and appeared more stable, so did not refer the matter to consultants, and was called away for the delivery of another pre-term baby.
She says she did not believe she would have been away from the neonatal unit for too long. If she believed so, she would have notified a consultant.
The court believes she was away from the room for about half an hour.
Dr Ventress was then called back to the neonatal unit, and observed the saturation levels were 50%, which were 'low - they should be above 90%'.
Child G was 'pink and well perfused' following efforts to assist her breathing, and moving her to room 1. Her saturation levels took 5 minutes to move up, but this was not seen as unusual.
Child G then had 'another profound apnoea', which Dr Ventress said would '99% sure' have happened in her presence.
The heart rate had dropped to 70, saturation levels to 40%, perfusion had dropped.
Breathing assistance was administered and there was a 'gradual improvement'. Saturations increased and perfusion improved, according to Dr Ventress's notes.
She tells the court "We can't carry on in this situation" as Child G had suffered two profound desaturations in a short period of time, so it was necessary to intervene via intubation.
Dr Ventress noted 'blood-stained fluid noted coming up from trachea/between cords' during intubation.
Child G had 'good air entry'.
There was a 'large leak' on the tube, but this was "not a concern" at this stage as there was good air entry.
Vitamin K was administered to help with blood clotting, as blood had been seen.
Dr Ventress tells the court: "She responded well to the treatment we had given her" at that stage.
At 5.30am Child G had another profound desaturation, with heart rate down to 60bpm and saturation levels down to 40%.
Child G would "recover slowly" each time from the desaturations.
After being put on the ventilator, Child G desaturated once more, so Dr Ventress said she was wondering if the problem was with the ventilation equipment. The equipment is changed, but Child G has another desaturation event at 6.05am, with the heart rate falling to 80bpm and saturations to 40%.
Dr Ventress said, following reintubation, the heart rate went up to 120 but the saturation levels remained at 50% despite increased oxygen support.
The doctor said she would "probably" have been cotside for most of this time.
The ETT is removed at 6.10am, with "thick secretions++ in mouth" and a blood clot at the end of the tube.
Dr Ventress says breathing support is given via the mask and jaw support, but the saturations fell to 17%.
Dr Brearey was called in "urgently".
The naso-gastric tube was aspirated as the abdomen "appeared very large", with about 100mls aspirated. The saturations gradually improved after this.
Dr Ventress says it is "quite common" for the tummy to get bigger with breathing support administered, and it was likely it was air was removed.
Child G was reintubated with a mild anaesthetic at 6.15am, with 'blood-stained fluid in oropharynx' noted.
Dr Ventress says the first observation of blood was in the windpipe, whereas this was more in the throat.
Child G "responded well" to being intubated.
X-rays at 4.48am and 6.36am had the comment for abdomen: 'generalised gaseous distention'.

Cross-Examination

4:03pm

Ben Myers KC, for Letby's defence, is now asking Dr Ventress questions.
Dr Ventress confirms she met Child G's parents when she was first admitted to the Countess of Chester Hospital.
Mr Myers presents a 'neonatal discharge summary' for when Child G was discharged from Arrowe Park, with a summary of Child G's condition and problems.
The main problems, Mr Myers, include 'chronic lung disease', 'extreme prematurity', 'sepsis suspected', and active problems include 'chronic lung disease - on CPAP' and 'establishing feeds'.
He said chronic lung disease would be a 'persistent issue' for Child G.
Dr Ventress said it would require breathing support such as CPAP.

4:07pm

Mr Myers says a baby like Child G requires constant medical care and was at risk of infection. Dr Ventress agrees.
He says that by the time Child G went back to Arrowe Park on September 8, it was believed it was "linked to infection".
Dr Ventress agrees.
Mr Myers asks if this was something which did not appear out of the ordinary.
Dr Ventress agrees.

4:10pm

Mr Myers shows blood gas readings for Child G for September 4-5, with pH readings that are 'normal', but the carbon dioxide and bicarbonate readings are 'elevated'.
Dr Ventress says that is common in premature babies with chronic lung disease.

4:14pm

Dr Ventress confirms she would have been, for the night shift of September 6-7, her duties would involve patients at the children's ward and neonatal unit. She says it would be "rare" if she would have to cover A&E as well. She would also be tasked with the post-natal unit as well.
At the time of the 'urgent review' at 2.35am on September 7, she said she would have been at the children's ward.
She said, from her statement to police, she would have gone "straight away" to review Child G.

4:17pm

Mr Myers asks that upon attending the unit, and informing the plan of action for Child G, was Dr Ventress then called away before she could carry out anything herself?
Dr Ventress agrees.
Mr Myers says it was for delivery of another pre-term baby.

4:20pm

Dr Ventress's clinical note says Dr Ventress was called out of theatre to say [Child G] had gone apnoeic and dusky.
Mr Myers refers to the note about 'blood-stained fluid noted coming up from trachea/between cords'.
He asks if that was noted after intubation.
Dr Ventress said it was during intubation.
Mr Myers asks if it would be unusual to see that.
Dr Ventress: "It's not uncommon for the baby to [have bleeding during intubation] - it is unusual to have blood coming up from beneath the vocal cords."

4:22pm

Mr Myers says would the blood-stained fluid be blood mixed with some secretion?
Dr Ventress says she cannot quantify what the fluid was, but it was "not pure blood".
Mr Myers says if there was any issue with blood intervening with the procedure. Dr Ventress says there was not.


Recap: Lucy Letby trial, Thursday, December 1
 
BBC 10% Lucy Letby: Nurse made celebration banner for baby before alleged attack

The other nurse replied: "Yup. Mary brought her cake in."
An hour later, Ms Letby asked: "Any idea what's caused it."
The nurse replied: "Nope. Just seems to be a [circulatory] collapse. Chest seems clear".
Ms Letby replied: "Hmmm. What can cause that? Is it that she's been an extreme prem who had long term inotrope and vent dependency and now she's older and doing more for herself and it just takes a little bug or something to tip her over as no reserves and chronic lung etc."
The nurse replied: "We are going with sepsis, and yes to no reserves, she looks grim".
 
"Her mother said: 'She was smiling and was really alert with the nurses. I would read to her and sing to her, and you would notice the difference when you did.'

Following the incident on September 7 the baby's expressions had changed 'and she looked different,' her parents said.

In the previous months her father had seen her engage with him more and more. He said: 'I would speak to her and she would smile at the sound of my voice.

'I could tell she was different (afterwards) because she didn't respond as she'd done before.'"

Daily Mail 10%
Lucy Letby 'tried to kill baby on milestone birthday', court hears
 
https://twitter.com/JudithMoritz

I'm at the Lucy Letby trial where the jury is beginning to hear about baby G, the smallest and most premature of the babies in this case. She weighed 1lb 2oz at birth. The nurse is charged with attempting to murder baby G on three occasions in September 2015.

Baby G was born 17 weeks early, at Arrowe Park hospital on Merseyside. She was transferred to the neonatal unit at
@TheCountessNHS
when she was the equivalent of 37 weeks gestation.

Jury hears that Lucy Letby took over nursing care for baby G on the night she was 100 days old. At 0215am the baby projectile vomited, had a discoloured abdomen, and had blood coming up from her throat. Doctors were called and she was moved to intensive care.

Baby G is alleged to have been over-fed. She stopped breathing and collapsed.

The court has been shown a number of text messages which Lucy Letby exchanged with colleagues, including several with another nurse on the day on the day after the first alleged attack.

Lucy Letby asked her colleague: “How are parents?” The other nurse wrote ”Devastated but determined she’ll get through ‘as always’. Thought that if she got to 100 (days) then they would feel confident she’d be fine”

Lucy Letby replied “Awful isn’t it. We’d all been sat at desk at start of the shift making banner”. Her colleague replied “Yup Mary brought her cake in”.

An hour later, Lucy Letby sent a message asking “Any idea what’s caused it?” The nurse replied: ‘Nope. Just seems to be a circ (circulatory) collapse, chest seems clear”...

Nurse Letby replied: "Hmmm. What can cause that? Is it that she’s been an extreme prem..and now she’s older and doing more for herself and it just takes a little bug or something to tip her over..?"

The court has heard that baby G was sent back and forth between Arrowe Park Hospital and the Countess of Chester neonatal unit, and each time she went back to Chester she became seriously ill again.

Statements by baby G's parents have been read out to the court. They say that their daughter has brain damage and has multiple disabilities including quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy. She is visually impaired and has to be fed by a tube into her stomach.
 
Thursday December 1st 2022

https://twitter.com/MerseyHack

Court now hearing about 7th alleged victim, a very premature baby girl we’ll refer to as Baby G. It’s alleged Nurse Letby attempted to murder her on 3 occasions. Baby G was born at 23 wks & 6 days at Arrowe Park Hospital in Wirral. She was in poor condition & needed ventilation

Baby G was transferred to the Countess of Chester after 13 weeks. She still needed help with breathing. The court’s hearing about the treatment and medication G needed over the coming weeks. @BBCNWT

The first alleged attempt to kill Baby G was at 2am on 7th September 2015. Nurse Letby was on shift but was not Baby G’s designated nurse. Another nurse was designated to look after Baby G.

Other nurses were giving G treatments and drugs in the hours before the alleged attempt to kill her. At 2am, Immediately before the alleged event, on G’s 100th day, she had a feed, had vomited a little and was asleep.

Following the alleged “event” when Lucy Letby allegedly tried to murder Baby G, the care of Baby G was transferred to Lucy Letby. It’s alleged that on 7/9/15 Ms Letby tried to murder her by injecting a large volume of feed and possibly air via her naso-gastric tube.

Jury shown doctor’s notes that after alleged attempt G had had projectile vomit, was red in the face and purple all over and was “distressed and uncomfortable”.

Baby G went from 3 hourly observations to 1 hourly observations following her first collapse. The jury are being told about treatments G had in the hours after the first alleged event.

Jury now being read statements from Baby G’s parents. Her mum describes how G arrived very prematurely when she went to the bathroom at Arrowe Park Hospital. She screamed for help and didn’t know if the baby was a boy or a girl. “She was just a tiny little thing, fighting”

The mum says G’s parents were told 5 times that Baby G “might not make it”. But she made good progress, there were no issues and brain scans were ok. [Premature babies can be susceptible to bleeds on the brain].

Baby G was 7 weeks old before her mum could hold her. Mum says she would read and sing to her baby “and you could notice the difference in her when you did.”

Describing the occasion of the first alleged attempt by Nurse #Letby to murder her baby when the parents were called in to the hospital, the mum says “It was such a shock to us. She looked like she was going to die.”

After being transferred back to Arrowe Park Hospital from Chester, G had a brain scan. Her mum was told she would be ok but could be “a little clumsy”. Later it was found that G has severe brain damage. She has cerebral palsy, is visually impaired and has to be fed by a tube.

In her statement G’s mum describes an occasion at Chester when she went back to the nursery early after the nurses needed to take a blood sample & found G “freaking out and screaming and looking puzzled.” The statement does not say which nurses were there when this occurred.

In a second statement, G’s mum explains how she and her husband were taught how to give their baby a feed via a syringe attached to a tube. But she says they were never allowed to measure the amount of milk to be given - that was always done by the nurses.

The court is also read a statement made by Baby G’s father. He says doctors at Arrowe Park [where G was born] told them G had “a 5% chance of survival.” “She was no bigger than your hand. She looked like a tiny person.”

G’s dad says they were told 5 times she could die. But “the older she got the more we thought she was going to make it.” G had regular scans at Arrowe for bleeds on the brain , but dad says G’s brain was “forming normally.”

When G was at Countess of Chester Hospital her dad noticed that the nurses had made a banner to mark the baby’s 100th day. Earlier the court heard that Nurse #Letby sent a message to a colleague that she was one of the nurses who helped make the banner.

G’s dad says when she was taken back to Arrowe Park after an alleged attempt to kill her, she was able to come off oxygen altogether. But he noticed something had changed after the time at Chester when she projectile vomited. 1/2

Before when you spoke to [Baby G] she “would smile and react.”After, she was different and would not respond to his voice anymore. 2/2

Baby G’s dad says the extent of her brain damage only became clear when she was 2 and half years old. She has quadriplegic cerebral palsy. It’s level 5 cerebral palsy which means she sometimes becomes very stiff and holds her breath.

Dad says “I don’t know what [G’s] life expectancy is. She needs 24 hour care.” @bbcmerseyside
 
Friday December 2nd 2022 - no live updates or tweets

Day 34 of Prosecution Evidence

Baby G

Unnamed designated nurse, CoCH, night shift 6th/7th Sep 2015 (Care transferred to Lucy Letby from 2am event)


and

Ailsa Simpson, Shift-Leader, CoCH, night shift 6th/7th Sep 2015



"The Band 5 nurse [...] said she gave Baby G a feed of expressed milk from her mother before leaving for a break at 2am on September 7, 2015. [...] 'I came back from my break and the lights were on in Nursery 1, which is straight ahead from where we came out. 'I went past that room to Nursery 2 but G wasn't there. [...]


[Ailsa Simpson recalled she] "had been sitting with Lucy Letby at the nurses' station when, 15 minutes' into her colleague's break, they both heard the projectile vomit. [...] Re-examined by Mr Astbury, she recalled telling police in an audio interview that upon hearing the vomit she had immediately stood up. She added at the time: 'I ran in and Lucy Letby ran in with me'."


10% Daily Mail Letby colleague: baby was stable when I had break, urgent on my return


"The colleague, [...] said the baby’s observations were stable when she left the high dependency unit after feeding her 45ml breast milk via the NGT.

On her return, [G] was not in the room and had been moved to the intensive care unit [...] she said.

[...] “If I was concerned, I wouldn’t have gone on my break. For example, if she looked unwell, or her monitor was alarming, or if she hadn’t tolerated her feed, or woke up upset.

Simon Driver, prosecuting, asked: “Was that development expected or unexpected?”

She replied: “It was unexpected.”

Mr Driver asked: “Why?”

The witness said: “Because she was fed and settled when I left her and there had not been any observations on her chart which caused me any concern.”

The witness told Ben Myers KC, defending, she was not trained in intensive care so her duties on the night would have been appropriately passed to Letby."



"Shift leader Ailsa Simpson said she was with Letby at the nursing station – directly opposite the high dependency unit – when she heard a projectile vomit at 2.15am.

Both rushed into the room where Miss Simpson said she was greeted by alarms sounding from the monitor connected to Child G’s cot.

She said she “sat up” the youngster and that either she or Letby then used a facemask to assist with Child G’s breathing.

She said: “It was a large, milky digested vomit. It had gone from over the cot and on to a chair next to her.”



PA Media
10% each from different publications

Independent Colleague ‘surprised at baby’s turn for the worse’, Lucy Letby trial is told
Belfast Telegraph Colleague ‘surprised at baby’s turn for the worse’, Lucy Letby trial is told
Gazette & Herald Colleague ‘surprised at baby’s turn for the worse’, Lucy Letby trial is told
Glasgow Times Colleague ‘surprised at baby’s turn for the worse’, Lucy Letby trial is told
Evening Standard Colleague ‘surprised at baby’s turn for the worse’, Lucy Letby trial is told
 
Last edited:

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
1,740
Total visitors
1,832

Forum statistics

Threads
605,241
Messages
18,184,676
Members
233,285
Latest member
Slowcrow
Back
Top