2011.04.06 Frye Hearing Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #781
is Jose sleeping?

JA: the problem it address is a part of which you belong? correct?
yes?

JA: difficulties of fraud isn't that correct?
witness: those problems were identified by the academy.

JA: do you have a copy? page fourty four. errors and fraud. it says: "in recent years,

my copy is not numbered the way yours in.

JA: first section: errors and fraud. do you have it?

witness: i do not.

JA: in recent years the integrity of crime labs has come in questions. lack of standards lack quality control methods. does that sound familiar?
yes.
 
  • #782
JA: I'll just read it to you.



Ummmmmm JA can read me a phonebook.
 
  • #783
Oh I'm awake now!
 
  • #784
Oooooo, here it comes.....is JA going to point out Logan's little problem with the DUI lab?
 
  • #785
I wonder if any of these so called "experts" and "non-experts" had any clue what they were getting in to? They all seem flabbergasted, nervous and unprepared.

I don't think anyone is fully prepared in this case. Just my opinion.
 
  • #786
Bubble above Dr. Logan's head: please don't go there, JA...please don't go there, please don't go there.
 
  • #787
Wow did Logan begrudgingly answer that one.
 
  • #788
As far as the witness goes, I do believe that any scientific study is going to contain errors. Frauds however is another matter!

MOO

Mel
 
  • #789
raise your hand if you think Miss Simms will redirect
 
  • #790
defense objected and JA said I'm not referring to any certain case. OH SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  • #791
Everytime they show Casey it looks like she's drawing on her tablet of paper. Lol. She just looks totally bored.
 
  • #792
JA is hitting Logan in the area Logan got into trouble with when he ran the WA state lab.
 
  • #793
On the upside...now I can not hear DS and her objections! HA!
 
  • #794
<ducking into the bomb shelter cuz I hear one falling>

The good Dr. sees it coming too....his expression got apprehensive.

moo
 
  • #795
This witness is praying to St. Cisco for a technical error.
 
  • #796
I wonder if any of these so called "experts" and "non-experts" had any clue what they were getting in to? They all seem flabbergasted, nervous and unprepared.

I think they underestimated how smart the SA is in the scientific field as well as their witnesses.
 
  • #797
  • #798
  • #799
JA: under validation of methods . . . . nowhere in there does it fault(?) new science?
BL - in fact it supports new science
 
  • #800
JA: validation of new methods. correct?

witness: yes. the validation of new science is encouraged.

no one has said they have established a new way of(method)of finding this? correct?
yes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
103
Guests online
2,523
Total visitors
2,626

Forum statistics

Threads
632,931
Messages
18,633,811
Members
243,349
Latest member
Mandarina_kat
Back
Top