2011.04.06 Frye Hearing Thread

[TotallyObsessed]

Whaaaaaaaaaat is he trying to saaaaaaaaay??? Good God Man, spit it out

 

[sleutherontheside]

Secret Science...

We couldn't cross examine Dr. Vass because they wouldn't give us anything.

 

[MAMABEAR]

Is jb giving a lesson to judge perry?

 

[Novice Seeker]

Why does Baez need his assistant to hit the "next" button???



NS

 

[TiaM]

Oh lord, here's Baez argument for this motion (I have no idea which one, or in total)

Whine, whine, whine, biotch, biotch, biotch, moan, moan, moan

"Secret science"

"Half science" lol - is that like half truth or mis truth!

Please let HHJP slap him down to the floor.

 

[Tulessa]

Watch it RR0004, Kimster carries a slingshot and she don't use marshmallows for bullets. :crazy: :floorlaugh:

See my eyes? :crazy:

 

[Scamperoo]

Baez now has a prompt sheet set up.

 

[darnudes]

JB is showing off his PowerPoint skills. :giggle:

What? The nod of his head to William esquire to click on the next page? Those skills? lol

 

[cloud9]

JB:

"institutional bias"
(referring to Dr. Vass)

:banghead::banghead::banghead:

 

[mitzi]

How nice that someone on the defense wrote out all this powerpoint, so Jose can just read it.

 

[shellsbells]

Ah crap, I had a meeting, has someone already pointed out JB's apostrophe misuse on his powerpoint? Gah!

 

[jharres]

JB bringing up Dr. Vass' "sniffer machine" again...

 

[Novice Seeker]

Baez wants to accuse someone of financial gain with this case?

 

[sleutherontheside]

As soon as Your Honor signs this order....you're signing a check for Dr. Vass.... ummmmmm not literally.

 

[JSR]

Is JB for real? I just popped in to the actual hearing. Unbelievable.

 

[Softail]

Oh Brother! Baez saying the Dr. Vass stands to make millions. :banghead::banghead:

 

[LolaMoon08]

We're back on this whole "sniffer machine." I thought that Dr. Vass' "sniffer machine" wasn't even used in this case?

 

[Chiquita71]

]JB says "clever move" by the State. [/B]Elephant in the room??

HHJP: says will look at ruling and at testimony of said dr. from other cases where he has testified.

JB: you have two issues. what were the specific facts in that case. in this case it was only one hair. only one showed decomp. now, that may be completely different set of facts than in the ny case. it was not just one piece of hair. also, the state in a "clever move" is saying the witness was hired by the defense.

HHJP: i don't care.

JB: we can't ignore the pink elephant in the room

HHJP: I don't see pink elephants. (personal note: :luv: )

Respectfully Quoted Novice Seeker

I thought JB said, it was "clever" of the prosecution to say the dr. in NY was hired by the defense? IIRC. I am confused and not questioning your post, just using it because I am confused. TIA.

:twocents:

Sorry sleuthers: just had to prove to myself I was not crazy. I thought Jose said the SA was trying to say he hired this witness. Somethings going on about that subject, something I am confused about.

ETA: IMHO Jose "performs" for ICA. I suppose this will be for the jury also...lucky them.

 

[faefrost]

We use powerpoint bullet points in court now? I thought that the Bar was one of the last true protectors of the oral argument and oratory skills?

 

[cloud9]

Whaaaaaaaaaat is he trying to saaaaaaaaay??? Good God Man, spit it out

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh: