I'm still confused about this whole section. She is challenging the witnesses conclusions or opinions, but isn't that something for trial? This is a Frye or evidence hearing. Is she in any way challenging the doctors credentials, experience or the science of Botany?
Where did the D/T find DS? Just wondering:waitasec:
I'd like to know, too. She's WAY over her head. IIRC, earlier today she called this a lawsuit. Twice.Where did the D/T find DS? Just wondering:waitasec:
Hard to get DS's point ever, IMO. She is boring and confusing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.