From
https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01...207+Examination+and+Extension+of+Deadline.pdf
BK apparently wanted to/had the inclination to deny that his ASD had much impact on his life:
Page 9: "Moreover, Dr. Orr specifically observed that, on symptom inventories, Defendant 'chose not to comment on any concerns about himself' and he showed "very little insight into his behavior and emotions. Exh. D7-E, p. 25 (Orr Phase 2 Rpt).' In other words, there was very little by way of self-reported symptoms."
Footnote on same page: "Similarly, Dr. Ryan also observed during her forensic psychiatric examination of Defendant that he did not "thrust forward" his symptoms in a manner suggesting malingering and, in fact, took "great pains to minimize and deny psychiatric symptomatology." Exh. D-13E, p. 54 (Dr. Ryan Phase 2 Rpt.)"
Ultimately, on p. 10, Judge Hippler writes, "In other words, Defendant cannot use personality disorder, or the asserted non-existence thereof, and the lack of testing for it, as a shield and a sword."