4 Univ of Idaho Students Murdered, Bryan Kohberger Arrested, Moscow, Nov 2022 #99

[MassGuy]

I always follow your posts very closely because I feel like you are very dedicated and well informed.
I wonder if you are an Attorney? I also hope you are right and the FRANKS will be denied.
I feel like we are all waiting for the Per verbal paint to dry. Ugh!

Not an attorney, just followed enough cases that certain events become predictable. The judge showed an incredible degree of skepticism in regards to the defense arguments, and Franks hearings are rarely granted to begin with. Even assuming that some of the defense arguments hold water (I don't think any of them do), there is no getting around Kohberger's DNA on the sheath.

Everything appears to have been done by the book, and I see this as nothing more than a standard defense argument to suppress evidence. We see it in pretty much every single case. It's his attorneys simply doing their job, and making a Hail Mary attempt to have a fighting chance.

Unless this evidence is stricken, he's dead to rights. And they know it.

 

[Boxer]

And

Yup, the BK relative that uploaded their sample to the database is the one that had an expectation of privacy. Not BK. He wasn’t in that database, so he has no standing. LE might have violated TOS, but not the law.

MOO that distant relative likely was glad to have helped catch a killer, sad to be related and wants their privacy now, and thats what the FBI is protecting - and has as much as said so.

 

[MassGuy]

This is the case that was cited by the prosecution and by Judge Judge:

https://meshbasestorage.blob.core.windows.net/dnacontainer/Green.pdf

This case also cites two other relevant cases that deal with what falls under discovery/what is material to the defendant's guilt or innocence.
JMO

Unlike the cases the defense likes to cite in their motions, this one is an absolutely perfect example. All that matters is the original sample comparison to the suspect, and not the names and information developed as part of the IGG process.

 

[LinasK]

All MOO

If the blood on the handrail was the only one then okay maybe I'd agree with you. But the glove with blood on it plus the handrail blood is a huge red flag for me personally.

2 cents

Only if the blood in the two places were the same. I think it's totally different random people in a busy house/area. It's not uncommon to lose ski gloves in a snowy area.

 

[Boxer]

That distant relative is the "work product" and is being used, much like the hostile subpeona for DM, to try to get something to break.

 

[Nila Aella]

Unlike the cases the defense likes to cite in their motions, this one is an absolutely perfect example. All that matters is the original sample comparison to the suspect, and not the names and information developed as part of the IGG process.

View attachment 564143View attachment 564144

Reading a little further gives you what was discoverable.
This motion to compel GG information was denied in part and granted in part.
JMO



In BKs case they did get the family tree.
JMO

 

[LinasK]

Reading a little further gives you what was discoverable.
This motion to compel GG information was denied in part and granted in part.
JMO

View attachment 564145View attachment 564146

In BKs case they did get the family tree

What you posted supports the Prosecution. I fail to see how this helps Kohlberger.

 

[Nila Aella]

What you posted supports the Prosecution. I fail to see how this helps Kohlberger.

Note Private forensic laboratories




jmo

 

[MassGuy]

Note Private forensic laboratories


View attachment 564148

jmo

Yes. But that doesn’t apply here. In that one, the DNA was a mixture that had to be separated. A private lab was used for that part.

No such thing happened here. The crime lab developed the profile on their own, as they weren’t impeded by a sample with multiple contributors. It was single source.

 

[MadMcGoo]

Prepare to continue the discussion on a new thread.

 

[Cool Cats]

All MOO

If the blood on the handrail was the only one then okay maybe I'd agree with you. But the glove with blood on it plus the handrail blood is a huge red flag for me personally.

2 cents

Blood was everywhere.

Details redacted from the affidavit filed in Idaho were revealed in documents unsealed in Washington State.​

The four University of Idaho students slain in November were attacked with such force that there was significant blood, spatter, and castoff throughout the Idaho home where the bodies were found, according to court records.

“The King Road residence contained a significant amount of blood from the victims including spatter and castoff (blood stain pattern resulting from blood drops released from object due to its motion) which, based on my training, makes it likely that this evidence was transferred to Kohberger’s person, clothing, or shoes.”

 

[Nila Aella]

Yes. But that doesn’t apply here. In that one, the DNA was a mixture that had to be separated. A private lab was used for that part.

No such thing happened here. The crime lab developed the profile on their own, as they weren’t impeded by a sample with multiple contributors. It was single source.

Page 2:
The private lab separated.
Then created a profile to submit to GED match.

We only have the result reported in this case, no details.

JMO

 

[MadMcGoo]

Continue the discussion on Thread #100 by clicking HERE.

Thread '4 Univ of Idaho Students Murdered, Bryan Kohberger Arrested, Moscow, Nov 2022 #100'

Nov 14, 2022

This tragedy seems to be breaking news:

Police said they responded to King Road for a report of an unconscious person. When officers arrived, they “discovered four individuals who were deceased...”

4 Idaho college students killed in 'targeted attack,' no suspects in custody

Four University of Idaho students were found dead on Sunday, officials said.

abcnews.go.com

Thread #1 Thread #2 Thread #3 Thread #4 Thread #5 Thread #6 Thread #7 Thread #8
Thread #9 Thread #10 Thread...

• ChatteringBirds
• Replies: 1,049
• Forum: Awaiting Trial

•