minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,529
- Reaction score
- 86,009
<modsnip> I think that was an incorrect ruling on her part.That’s why it got excluded from the trial?
Last edited by a moderator:
<modsnip> I think that was an incorrect ruling on her part.That’s why it got excluded from the trial?
I suppose if he was yelling, I did it, I killed them both!! Get me my lawyers here NOW or I'll kill you!Generally, character evidence is not admissible against a criminal defendant.
Well yes if it’s an admission related to these crimes it would be allowed.I suppose if he was yelling, I did it, I killed them both!! Get me my lawyers here NOW or I'll kill you!
Would that be an exception? That kind of statement?
Makes one wonder just what got him so mad at County Jail that he threatened to kill the guard, because IMO, those are some strong words...I'll kill you! And now the jury has heard he said them.
For now?Judge Gull enters the courtroom and says she has viewed the video. Rozzi objects, Gull says she is sustaining the objection and the video will not be shown to the jury for now.
![]()
Delphi Murders trial: Day 12 live blog
Day 12 of the Delphi Murders trial begins with the jury expected to hear two hours of audio.www.wishtv.com
Maybe the prosecution will be able to show this in their rebuttal?
While the Odin stuff is uber cringy and I really hope the defense doesn’t try and sell that to the jury, I DON’T think they are deluding themselves at all! The defense hasn’t even had their turn yet and I have doubts that he is guilty
For example....I can't find my sunglasses...uhhh, my dear, they're on top of your head! HA! I must be losing my mind!Has stress or incredulousness never cause you to say, I'm going crazy or It's making me crazy...nuts or I must be losing my mind...I'm losing it? I've certainly done that. JMO
FWIW- the facts that he said he was crazy and said he did it are demonstratedThe concept of legal insanity and medical insanity are not the same. Legal insanity (in a very general sense) deals with a person's ability to distinguish right from wrong.
Someone upthread wondered why he didn't take an insanity plea, which would require insanity at the time of the crime. I was responding to that conversation.I don’t think there was ever a suggestion that he was insane when these crimes were committed. The insane behavior didn’t start until he had been in solitary for several months.
How does Kathy Allen saying that negate what Richard Allen said about losing his mind?
I think the prosecutions case has made it very clear that Richard Allen was suffering from psychosis and the defense hasn’t even put their case on.
Using Richard Allen’s words of “I’m loosing my mind” to prove he’s sane is a weird reach imo
I think it got excluded because the judge is very biased against the defense. I think that was an incorrect ruling on her part.
Because he ate his own poop?Why did the prison forcibly give him an anti psychotic drug more than once when they claim he was of sound mind and not psychotic
Re: the diagnostic elasticity and the concept of psychosis vs faking it, I don’t see why both can’t be true at differing points. For example:I'd wondered similarly, particularly since I know very little about how, for example, amicus and sub judice rules apply in the US.
I was pretty shocked by the seeming ethical violations and also the diagnostic elasticity of the clinical psych yesterday --distinctly at odds with the oath and professional obligations I hold dear, and I'm baffled by how she seems to have been approved as an expert witness, in light of qualifications and ongoing investigations. A witness, perhaps, but an expert? She seems to have vacillated between diagnoses of RA as genuinely experiencing psychosis and "faking" symptoms of same, the shredding of original notes as a standard of her clinical practice (!!! I shared this one with my surgical colleagues), listening in on phone calls and the apparent recanting or reframing of substantial parts of her original diagnosis.
Yes, the confessions are damning but should she ever have testified? Again, not a lawyer but struck me as a properly contentious topic.
It's an odd thing. I think RA is almost certainly BG and almost certainly guilty. But so much about this case and trial seems wayward from the POV of evenhandeness. Is this feeling illusory? Or are there genuine issues with the way this case and trial are being handled (setting aside the theatrics and hyperbolic narratives, etc)?
? This?
Later, officer Jason Bedwell, at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, said Allen made another statement earlier this year that he was sorry for what he did, and that he killed the girls.
![]()
Jurors hear about Richard Allen's prison confessions in Delphi trial
Jurors watched two video interrogations of Richard Allen, one on Oct. 13, 2022 and another on Oct. 26, 2022, the same day Allen was arrested.www.indystar.com
So like, how many of y’all who think he is absolutely guilty would (after this case) volunteer that you were somewhere on the same day and time a murdered occurred?
me. If I was there and a possible witness to anything that might be helpful I would have no reason not to volunteer that info to LE. Your question presumes RA is not guilty. MOOSo like, how many of y’all who think he is absolutely guilty would (after this case) volunteer that you were somewhere on the same day and time a murdered occurred?
why did the defense not attempt to have him evaluated and declared incompetent to stand trial or assist in his own defense if he was flinging and eating his own poo and psychotic?Why did the prison forcibly give him an anti psychotic drug more than once when they claim he was of sound mind and not psychotic
That baffles me completely- moowhy did the defense not attempt to have him evaluated and declared incompetent to stand trial or assist in his own defense if he was flinging and eating his own poo and psychotic?
Cuz, they probably knew it was all an act..why did the defense not attempt to have him evaluated and declared incompetent to stand trial or assist in his own defense if he was flinging and eating his own poo and psychotic?
Because the Odinists made him do it?why did the defense not attempt to have him evaluated and declared incompetent to stand trial or assist in his own defense if he was flinging and eating his own poo and psychotic?