Hence the different coloured plate; she's one step ahead of you.
I'd just say, "I prefer this colour plate and I'm totally happy with the swap. Bon appétit!"
Hence the different coloured plate; she's one step ahead of you.
A smoking gun perhaps? THAT would be awesome!I hope something good, to prove or invalidate her lies!
A smoking guns perhaps? THAT would be awesome!
There is definitely a bias from the female presenter.
For her this is about how accused women are treated so she is viewing it through that prism. She might not realise it but she wants to believe her.
It is like another version of OJ. If Erin is innocent, it will be a victory for women regardless of the actual facts of the case.
RSBM1m ago
Erin contests that she panicked after learning people were unwell
Dr Rogers suggests to Erin Patterson that she knowingly served foraged death cap mushrooms to her guests at the lunch.
Erin denies it.
Dr Rogers takes Erin to her comment that she "panicked" after the lunch and did not want to tell people that she had foraged.
Erin says she did not say that.
"Can you please alert me to the answer that I gave where I said that I panicked when I learnt that everyone was unwell?" Erin asks.
"Certainly," Dr Rogers replies.
I find her extremely unlikeable. MOOI kind of am impressed with her performance and coaching, but it's still arguing semantics and her lies are too overwhelming for it to make any difference. The jury might see her as petulant and evasive.
Things we learned today
Both the defence and the prosecution had an opportunity to question accused killer Erin Patterson today.
Much of the day's questioning featured crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC suggesting propositions to Erin, which were then emphatically denied.
Here's what we learned today from her testimony:
Erin confirmed she lied about her dehydrator and history of foraging to police. She described her lying to police as a "stupid, kneejerk reaction", saying she was scared but that she shouldn't have done it
Photos were shown to the court of what appeared to be Erin's kitchen, which Erin said she had no memory of taking. Erin denied that photos that appeared to be of mushrooms sitting on her kitchen bench were death cap mushrooms. This conflicts with mycologist Tom May's evidence that the appearance was consistent with death caps.
Erin confirmed she had foraged for wild mushrooms in the months before the July 29 lunch.
Erin conceded that it was "probably true" that she knew she would become a suspect if she told police the truth about her dehydrating of mushrooms.
Erin denied she had told her Facebook friends she was an atheist, denied she was very close to Christine Hunt, a previous witness, and denied she had used emojis to mock the Pattersons praying for her.
Erin denied she told her lunch guests that she had cancer, a contradiction to testimony given by Ian Wilkinson and Simon Patterson
We also learned that the trial may extend even longer than planned, with Justice Beale telling the jury there was a possibility that more evidence could be presented.
RSBM"Her evidence was that you wrote "So your evidence is that you did not say or post that you were an atheist?" Dr Rogers asks.
Erin says she did not post that message.
I do as well. Coached though she may be, she can't help but let her snide side slip when she denies what the prosecution's questions are asking. Even when she's said things to the contrary before. And her trying to discredit witnesses will hopefully look very poor to the jury.I find her extremely unlikeable. MOO
RSBMI think the reason she wouldn't admit it at first is two-fold.
One, she didn't want her victims to have the antidote in time.
Two, if she stalled then maybe the toxins would clear before the doctors tested them and her for death caps. In the end, the female victims didn't test positive because they had cleared out of their systems already.
And EP had valid defense for not testing positive because she was not tested in time either.
Sub Judice is in place so it limits what people can and can’t say.I get there are people that want to always see the best in others. But how can some people defend Erin? Even if you think she is innocent, fine that's your opinion and neither will be proven until the jury's verdict is in. But still her lies, denying everything even when the evidence is literally RIGHT THERE, her seeming smarminess to questions, her throwing everyone else under the bus to save herself from the fallout of her own alleged behaviour. I don't see what others see that makes them defend her. She comes across as quite arrogant and manipulative tbh. Poor Simon and the children. Lives ruined for no other reason than ego IMO
I agree.
I think the reason she wouldn't admit it at first is two-fold.
One, she didn't want her victims to have the antidote in time.
Two, if she stalled then maybe the toxins would clear before the doctors tested them and her for death caps. In the end, the female victims didn't test positive because they had cleared out of their systems already.
And EP had valid defense for not testing positive because she was not tested in time either.
This exchange from today says it all.I was actually starting to think maybe she didn’t try to kill Simon because isolating him from his support network would have been an ultimate win for her,
But then I remembered the death cap leftovers in the bin. That was Simon’s pastie IMO. Simon is the person she blames for everything awry, and he was her main target and the others were mostly collateral to her. She invited them to pressure Simon to come, because Simon was pulling away and was done with her. IMO
Again, classic DV offender behaviour - they’re most at risk when they’re leaving.
It feels worse to think that his parents and the aunty and uncle were just disposable collateral, not even the main target of her rage other than that the in laws were a strong support for Simon, IMO
RSBMPatterson said she hadn’t given the lunch guests any reason for the invitation to the lunch on July 29, 2023.
“I didn’t give them any reason when I invited them, I just invited them,” Patterson said.
Can someone explain to Erin that obesity is not cancer? Like I know she’s not been to nursing school yet, but surely she knows the difference?