Erin, Simon, and his parents, Don and Gail, are in a group chat messaging platform called Signal, where they all get together and communicate at times.
I think this could be the problem and a motive, where she's had enough of the whole lot of them. The main instigator, her estranged husband
Erin Patterson described estranged husband as ‘coercive’ and in-laws as ‘demanding’, trial hears – as it happened
Simon Patterson answers questions about ‘inflammatory’ messages from Erin
Nanette Rogers SC is now re-examining Simon.
Simon says his mother agreed to not read the messages sent from Erin to reduce the anxiety she had about being diagnosed with encephalitis.
He says the “inflammatory” message was a few months after the previous messages shown to the court from December 2022.
He recalls at the time his son was very tired while staying with him. He subsequently asked Erin to help his son get to bed earlier. He says Erin sent a reply to the group chat on Signal with his parents
“I tell you what, if mum had of read that, I don’t know what that would have done to her,” he says.
Asked by Rogers what was “inflammatory” about the messages, Simon says:
“It was having a crack at me and accusing me of some things in response to what I’d messaged her about. That’s not the bit I objected to. It was the fact she’d sent it, especially to my … knowing mum’s condition and what that can do to mum … I’m still upset about that.”
View image in fullscreen
Crown Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC re-examined Simon Patterson on Monday morning. Photograph: Martin Keep/AFP/Getty ImagesShare
Mandy concludes cross-examination of Simon Patterson
Mandy tells Simon that the messages he has shown Simon today are the “only messages” about the payment of school fees.
Simon has characterised Erin as “inflammatory” and “aggressive” during a dispute over the children’s school fees, jurors are told.
Simon says the message he is thinking of has not been shown today.
Mandy concludes his cross-examination.
View image in fullscreen
Barrister Colin Mandy SC has finished his cross-examination of Erin Patterson’s estranged husband, Simon. Photograph: James Ross/AAP
Group text messages shown in court
Mandy asks Simon about his characterisation of Erin as “aggressive” in her messages during a financial dispute about their children in December 2022. The messages were made in a group chat with Erin, Simon and his parents, Don and Gail, the court heard.
Mandy reminds Simon the defence rejects this characterisation of Erin’s message and then shows the courtroom text messages between 4 December and 17 December 2022.
In a group chat on the messaging platform Signal, Gail Patterson writes on 4 December:
Hi Erin, it would be lovely if we could catch up with you, [our son] and [our daughter] before you go to NZ please. Would you be free next Saturday or Sunday lunch or tea? Love Don and Gail.
Erin replies on 4 December:
I’m sorry, but I can’t stop thinking about the comment that Don made on the phone, that the financial issues are probably easily solved and that Simon can “reverse the single thing in his tax return.” That is mind boggling in its implication, if that’s really what he said he would do.
“Revering the single thing” is basically telling the government that Simon and I are not separated any more, and that we are still married and living together as a couple and shared finances, so that they consider our income as a whole.
The immediate implication of that would be that I can no longer get family tax benefit ... Now I have no income from a job because I quit to care for the kids … and if he “reverses the single thing” then I’ll not be able to claim family tax benefit and I’ll not be entitled to any child support …
Simon is hiding behind the communication from the government that now that I have made a child support claim, he doesn’t have to pay any bills outside it.
That is an instruction for people who want to be a bare minimum parent …
On the same day, Don replies:
Sorry I may have misled you Erin. I regret possibly making a false presentation of Simon’s opinions. That is why I immediately withdrew it …
Erin on the 6 December writes in the group chat:
Thanks Don. I understand your position and that you and Gail don’t want to be involved in certain aspects of these difficulties as it is uncomfortable and awkward …..
She says Simon is “under the misapprehension” that a child support assessment covers “every expense for the children under the sun.”
Under cross-examination, Simon says he remembers the messages. But he says “this is not what I had in mind” when he describes Erin as “aggressive” in messages.
This blog is now closed
www.theguardian.com