GUILTY Australia - 3 dead after eating wild mushrooms, Leongatha, Victoria, Aug 2023 *Arrest* #21

  • #221
  • #222

Kyle, Jackie O avoid charges over Erin Patterson mushroom trial remark​

That's a shame.
I think Kyle is vile, and Jackie is too, by default. Kyle needs to be held to account for a lot of the things he says. I can't even stand listening to his voice for a nano second.
 
  • #223
they keep getting away with it. Feels like connections count for way too much in this country because for people like them, sub judice laws don't apply apparently.
 
  • #224
That's a shame.
I think Kyle is vile, and Jackie is too, by default. Kyle needs to be held to account for a lot of the things he says. I can't even stand listening to his voice for a nano second.

Birds of a feather ...
 
  • #225
Birds of a feather ...
I still think she must be secretly in love with him, though, she shouldn’t be - he’s not worthy.
 
  • #226
I still think she must be secretly in love with him, though, she shouldn’t be - he’s not worthy.

To use another applicable proverb: If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.
 
  • #227
To use another applicable proverb: If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.
Couldn’t agree more. Erin’s rabid friends got more than fleas, IMO

It still blows my mind that she’s got her best friend by her side. Why? Why would you support a mass murderer? They didn’t even know her IRL until she was arrested. 😳
 
  • #228
It's the platonic* version of women who fall in love with serial killers and marry them.

*well, I'm assuming.
 
  • #229
December 7 all of the other episodes of the Stan doco are coming out. 2 very good friends are on it. Can’t wait 😍
 
  • #230
December 7 all of the other episodes of the Stan doco are coming out. 2 very good friends are on it. Can’t wait 😍

I don't have Stan so I'll need to wait for the reviews.
 
  • #231
I don't have Stan so I'll need to wait for the reviews.

Might be a free trial around - hopefully - because they really don’t deserve subscriptions 🤣
 
  • #232
There’s someone asking on social media what’s happening with the court case - so I’ll answer here.

One of Erin’s friends is taking another ex friend (yours truly) to court to restrict my ability to post online honestly and openly. It won’t succeed, because it’s based on ridiculous (lack of) logic and understanding of the court process. It’s a bully move, and I won’t stop sharing openly about my experiences with who I consider a psychopath (Erin) and her flying monkey friends.

They should take a defamation suit but they won’t because the things I’ve said are 100% backed up by evidence and well, they’re not famous even though they wish they were.

This person tried to have my sister evicted from the recent court hearing because seeing her name on the Webex chat allegedly made her feel “intimidated”, luckily the registrar isn’t able to be manipulated and refused.

They also took their complaint to the police but of course the police refused to act because no laws were broken.

It’s exactly what I expect from people who are friends with Erin Patterson. They’re all stupid, manipulated conspiracy theory bullies who don’t seem to be able to grasp that opinions and open communication isn’t a criminal act - they really should be reflecting on their friendships and support of someone who was planning to kill their entire family.

I proposed an undertaking whereby the person accusing me of the things they’re doing to me is restricted from doing the things I’m accused (wrongly) of, and I’d be happy to agree because I wasn’t doing what was alleged anyway, but that didn’t satisfy the person.

This person and their “friends” have relentlessly harassed, defamed and bullied me and I’m looking very forward to revealing the truth and evidence in court.

Ridiculous bullying nonsense IMO.
 
Last edited:
  • #233
There’s someone asking on social media what’s happening with the court case - so I’ll answer here.

One of Erin’s friends is taking another ex friend (yours truly) to court to restrict my ability to post online honestly and openly. It won’t succeed, because it’s based on ridiculous (lack of) logic and understanding of the court process. It’s a bully move, and I won’t stop sharing openly about my experiences with who I consider a psychopath (Erin) and her flying monkey friends.

They should take a defamation suit but they won’t because the things I’ve said are 100% backed up by evidence and well, they’re not famous even though they wish they were.

This person tried to have my sister evicted from the recent court hearing because seeing her name on the Webex chat allegedly made her feel “intimidated”, luckily the registrar isn’t able to be manipulated and refused.

They also took their complaint to the police but of course the police refused to act because no laws were broken.

It’s exactly what I expect from people who are friends with Erin Patterson. They’re all stupid, manipulated conspiracy theory bullies who don’t seem to be able to grasp that opinions and open communication isn’t a criminal act - they really should be reflecting on their friendships and support of someone who was planning to kill their entire family.

I proposed an undertaking whereby the person accusing me of the things they’re doing to me is restricted from doing the things I’m accused (wrongly) of, and I’d be happy to agree because I wasn’t doing what was alleged anyway, but that didn’t satisfy the person.

This person and their “friends” have relentlessly harassed, defamed and bullied me and I’m looking very forward to revealing the truth and evidence in court.

Ridiculous bullying nonsense IMO.

They obviously don't have anything better to do with their time.
I am sorry to hear that they are wasting your time.

imo
 
  • #234
There’s someone asking on social media what’s happening with the court case - so I’ll answer here.

One of Erin’s friends is taking another ex friend (yours truly) to court to restrict my ability to post online honestly and openly. It won’t succeed, because it’s based on ridiculous (lack of) logic and understanding of the court process. It’s a bully move, and I won’t stop sharing openly about my experiences with who I consider a psychopath (Erin) and her flying monkey friends.

They should take a defamation suit but they won’t because the things I’ve said are 100% backed up by evidence and well, they’re not famous even though they wish they were.

This person tried to have my sister evicted from the recent court hearing because seeing her name on the Webex chat allegedly made her feel “intimidated”, luckily the registrar isn’t able to be manipulated and refused.

They also took their complaint to the police but of course the police refused to act because no laws were broken.

It’s exactly what I expect from people who are friends with Erin Patterson. They’re all stupid, manipulated conspiracy theory bullies who don’t seem to be able to grasp that opinions and open communication isn’t a criminal act - they really should be reflecting on their friendships and support of someone who was planning to kill their entire family.

I proposed an undertaking whereby the person accusing me of the things they’re doing to me is restricted from doing the things I’m accused (wrongly) of, and I’d be happy to agree because I wasn’t doing what was alleged anyway, but that didn’t satisfy the person.

This person and their “friends” have relentlessly harassed, defamed and bullied me and I’m looking very forward to revealing the truth and evidence in court.

Ridiculous bullying nonsense IMO.
Keep calling them flying monkeys because that's exactly what they are. Go ahead try to sue me Erin!!!
 
  • #235
Keep calling them flying monkeys because that's exactly what they are. Go ahead try to sue me Erin!!!
Oh they are absolutely flying moneys and I’ll continue referring to them as such . Birds of a feather….
Years ago they succeeded in silencing me because their bullying along with Erin was relentless and I was having personal issues and felt extremely overwhelmed, so I backed away. I’m a different person now and won’t tolerate it for a second.
 
  • #236
About the upcoming Stan documentary

 
  • #237
Well. Not going to spoil it but it’s a bit haphazard and bizarre with the focus on the (free) journalists who work for channel 9, who owns Stan.

It seems rushed, poorly told and hard to follow even for someone who knows every detail of the case.

Was glad to see her flying monkey friends pretty much completely excluded though, even though they told everyone they are stars on it. 🤣🙄

I was a bit miffed at really important points being brushed over - and the focus on her (fake) eating disorder being taken as fact.

One of my text messages was read out but nothing from our knowledge of Erin was exposed - which is great because they weren’t allowed to.

The cinematography and Dr Chris were fabulous, though.

IMO
 
  • #238
<modsnip: Quoted post was removed>

In other news, I’ve been served a new restraining order from commenting about Erin’s friends directly from one of her supporters. Allegedly, my conduct on websleuths has made a person anxious and unable to sleep or go back to work. Perhaps, instead, this person has felt under the pump from being exposed in the media for supporting Erin instead - Who knows, I can’t follow the crazy. But it’s surely irrational and won’t succeed. It seems that her flying monkeys are now using the court system to bully me (and others) instead of focusing on the fact they were best friends with a mass murderer and reflecting on that.

These people allegedly have hold of a voice recording I sent to a private friends group saying I wouldn’t be surprised if this person supported Erin to “get rid of her family” which i stand by / its my opinion and we are allowed to have opinions and theories in private without being throttled by the court and having these vexatious people like Erin use the court system to abuse us. I am aware who allegedly shared that with the person and it’s a crime in itself to do so.

I have no doubt these frivolous vexatious cases won’t succeed as I’m being accused of things I’ve not done / anyone who has disparaged these narcissists online is being attributed to me which is entirely false and yet another example of how stupid and conspiratorial these people are. They think because they had their 5 minutes of fame in the media that they are some special protected species who can say whatever they want with no evidence. Not how the judicial system works but it is how Erin and her ilk thinks it works. Just lie and concoct evidence and you will be fine which is not how it works in reality 🙄

Again, IMO - should not they be focusing on their contribution to supporting someone who killed their family? Can they reflect on things they perhaps said which may have been misconstrued by a crazy mind like Erin’s and change that going forward with other friends? My mind boggles at the complete ignorance of the law and lack of personal insight and introspection.

I look forward to including these outrageous accusations in future posts. 🥱

IMO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #239
Last edited:
  • #240
DBM wrong thread!
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
1,118
Total visitors
1,230

Forum statistics

Threads
636,039
Messages
18,689,049
Members
243,496
Latest member
alimckenzie
Back
Top