GUILTY IN - Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen guilty - #220

[mrjitty]

In addition to what @Megnut posted, the abduction theory was one to which Auger was constantly alluding when discussing LG’s phone. She seemed to be the one who brought up cell jammers & blocking bags (my paraphrasing). Most likely BM simply pushing out the explanations which the defense planned to utilize at trial.

JMO


Most likely why he isn’t anyone’s counsel these days - his tactics have worn thin & one can only get away with so many lies before they’re known as nothing but a liar.

I guess those shoes fit like Cinderella’s for ‘ol Fibbin’ Bobby.

JMO

Yes, Auger floated it at the MIL hearing. This theory can only have come from the defence. But we know that the evidence was the opposite.

It seems fairly clear the defence created a conspiracy theory and got Motta to promote it

This is not that unusual for lawtube of course. One of the most popular channels has defence surrogates on the show without correcting or challenging false statements, then repeats them.

 

[Quim The Extraordinaire]

I’m playing catch up and would greatly appreciate the expertise of people here. What are the next steps? Is this now considered “fully briefed” so that the Appeals Court can assign a panel?

Is it within the court’s discretion whether to hold a hearing?

Thank you.

 

[girlhasnoname]

I am still wondering why months before trial Motta repeatedly claimed that the girls phone was switched off shortly after the abduction and then turned back on in the dead of night - proving according to Motta, that the killer(s) returned to the scene

But then at trial we learned the digital analysis showed the phone was always on, so of course the defence always knew this since the time they received the extraction.

So where did Motta get this false information from, why did he keep pushing it so often, and why did he never explain how he got this so wrong when the trial evidence finally revealed to the public that the phone was not in fact switched off?

Because he is a low life wannabe Podcaster hack IMO.

 

[snooptroop88]

Because he is a low life wannabe Podcaster hack IMO.

YES! YES!

I guess now I’ll have to return the I Bob Motta shirt I ordered for you.

Never mind on Kohberger, he probably already got one from the prison commissary before they sold out.

 

[INfisherman]

I’m playing catch up and would greatly appreciate the expertise of people here. What are the next steps? Is this now considered “fully briefed” so that the Appeals Court can assign a panel?

Is it within the court’s discretion whether to hold a hearing?

Thank you.

Hi Quim.

Appellate judges will decide if oral arguments are necessary or the oral arguments may be requested by either party who have filed their briefs. After that point, a panel of 3 judges will review everything & make a decision to reverse, uphold the lower court’s original decision or throw it back to the lower court for further action. Either side may appeal this appellate ruling to the SCOIN (Superior Court of IN).

About the Appellate Process

www.in.gov

 

[twall]

I’m playing catch up and would greatly appreciate the expertise of people here. What are the next steps? Is this now considered “fully briefed” so that the Appeals Court can assign a panel?

Is it within the court’s discretion whether to hold a hearing?

Thank you.

Appellant’s Reply Brief is due on April 23, 2026.

Indiana Courts Case Search - MyCase

Indiana Supreme Court, Public Access

public.courts.in.gov