I agree. And you’ve really gotta just consent for optics, because they’re almost certainly able to get a warrant otherwise.
Agreed. LE, IMO, went into the home with a purpose. They were not just snooping around. IMO
I agree. And you’ve really gotta just consent for optics, because they’re almost certainly able to get a warrant otherwise.
That looks like a broken irrigation line, the scourge of the desert.View attachment 642950Water seen shooting up behind Nancy's home. Happened today
Kash Patel FBI directorWho is Kashy Kash?
I’m sure yesterday there was an update from the Sheriffs office which stated there were NO suspects and NO POIs. If this is the case, the family are victims.
ETA - yes, it’s here
I believe this a million percent.According to one theory, perhaps the people who disappeared Nancy are not the same people who are making the ransom demands. JMO.
We know the deadline for the ransom money (5pm local time), but do we know what time she'd then be released?
Even if I was a trusting person, and I am not by far, I wouldn't trust them even the slightest bit. To take millions with a chance of never being caught?? But those chances of being caught grow by releasing Nancy. I'm not feeling good about this at all.
I didn't like that they were reduced to begging, in public no less, and now paying a high ransom to MAYBE get their mother back? It would be more than a double slap in the face to pay and get nothing for it. And you KNOW they'd be laughing about it. The thought really frosts my butt.![]()
![]()
![]()
It's going to be a nailbiter of a day for everyone. I really feel for the family.![]()
I take that back - thank you for sharing this. I can now see the legal document refers to "On the morning of 1 February, a friend of N.G.'s contacted the victim's family and notified them that N.G. had not attended church that morning".Why would the FBI put false information in their criminal complaint filing?
In those very first reports it was said that homicide teams were on scene at NG’s house. Some of the statements made by the sheriff during the first presser made it sound like it was a grim scene. IMO, I think she could’ve been dead before she even left the house.I'd be surprised if she was alive after the day she was taken.
thank you for responding and clarifying. I admit, I do not know the reason behind that communication from church friend being left out of the timeline. But I also don't think the feds would continue a lie in a federal filing by stating that communication happened if it did not.This is only my opinion.
I personally keep the ‘official timeline’ pinned to the top of my notes as I track the developments of any case I follow.
If there is an ‘official change’ I personally like to see the ‘official timeline’ revised (so I can update my notes)to reflect any changes made by LE. I have in other cases found myself ‘working off inaccurate timelines’ to my detriment ( more times than I will admit).. Absolutely I could be nitpickingI admit I have been guilty of it before.
Ticya thank you for your response and I agree that as you stated both can indeed be true.
I hope this clarifies the criticism in my post and that I acknowledge that the point you made is well taken.![]()
Some homes in AZ irrigate their roofs due to the heat and dryness. That is according to a coworker who had a house in the Phoenix area.Likely a sprinkler head busted from the irrigation line. Pretty common.
Honestly, a ransom note in America is really more of simething you may strugglecto even see in a bad murder mystery movie plot.back to my Jon Benet vibes
last seen at bedtime
up late
out at party earlier
ransom note of questionable origin
movie quotes in ransom note
family members suspected
family members appear in media
Jon Benet's body never left the premises ( interesting)
broken glass and possible break in near rear door
questionable evidence.
mOO
How would they know even?PER FOX PER TMZ..BITCOIN ACCOUNT REMAINS EMPTY... THE MONEY HAS NOT BEEN DEPOSITED IN THE ACCOUNT
Is there a link?PER FOX PER TMZ..BITCOIN ACCOUNT REMAINS EMPTY... THE MONEY HAS NOT BEEN DEPOSITED IN THE ACCOUNT
TMZ saw the ransom letter presumably with the account details.How would they know even?
If they have access to the address on the ransom note, then the wallet’s transactions are traceable by anybody on the blockchain’s “public ledger”.How would they know even?
Bitcoin transactions are publicly visible on the blockchain. This is the entire premise of bitcoin (but to reiterate, there is no personal information associated at this point). There are multiple websites that let you explore the blockchain and look at transactions. For example, Blockchain Explorer - Bitcoin Tracker & More | Blockchain.comHow would they know even?
No, 11:56AM, "family checks on Nancy". The contact to the family has been removed from the timeline; Sheriff originally told a press conference someone called the "children" at 11AM after NG failed to show up for church.
Would the FBI include it in a criminal complaint (against the hoaxer) if it was false?Yes that is exactly the point of my post.
The misinformation seems to have come from the sheriff. JMO.
It is making me question whether the ''call from church" is similar misinformation and if that's why it has now been omitted.