What would the info not presented be?
From my earlier posts:
"Mr. G seems to openly be soliciting ppl to
urge the presiding judge to make decisions and rulings based on
information not presented in party's motions, briefs, or
in the courtroom."
@Luna20
The
info not presented in courtroom
would be that 2, or 200, or 2000 ppl, a
number of ppl (in the gen. public, more or less
random ppl, who are not parties or witnesses in the case)
told the judge about their opinions, i.e., they believe he should deny/reject the plea deal as unfair.*
That would not be presented in ct.: it's
not relevant; it's
inadmissable.
imo w some familiarity of Rules of Evidence.
Welcoming clarification or correction re my interp on that point.
This is not a "People's Choice" television show to judge a talent contest.
That said, I cannot imagine the feelings of loss & pain these families and others are experiencing, including Mr. G. Plus his frustration of what he saw/sees as mistakes, bad decisions, bungled opportunities, and in court unwarranted delays, continuances, etc.
And now no trial for what
he apparently saw/sees as a slam-dunk, sure-fire, can't-miss, case which would have absolutely, positively ended in Death Penalty.
____________________________________________
* The gist of Mr. G's stmt was---
If you think the judge should deny/reject the plea deal, call him at this number and tell him it's not justice (or not fair, etc. whatever wording).
Sorry, I did not locate link w his exact phrase.