Nila Aella
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2022
- Messages
- 1,524
- Reaction score
- 11,988
Direct/indirect transfer of the DNA in this case is important.His DNA is at the scene. Direct.
It's also in the victims bed where they were murdered, on a piece of evidence very much suited to the manner of death of the victims. Not direct but a very damning fact. MO
Which is why there was argument about terminology and what should/should not be allowed in expert opinion.
JMO
The rules allow it.I think it's very negligent of her, especially when she's stated, in court to the judge, that she's absolutely overwhelmed by the case and it's mountains of discovery. MO
It's either negligence on her her part or she thinks a plea may stop the proceedings to trial. MO
The D has met their deadlines.
My understanding of what AT said:
It is not just the mountains of discovery, it is how it is being produced/or not to the defense. It is specifically what has happened since the P's December discovery deadline.
The Judge said he will look at the additional expert submissions to determine if they were appropriate or not.
Fair IMO.
JMO