At this time, there is no alternate suspect evidence. The defense must have names, and must provide them before trial, if they exist. They cannot just say SODDI. BK has no alibi between 2:47 and 4:48, regardless of what the defense claims, period. There is no "partial" alibi. There either is one, or there is not one. And unless someone suddenly remembers seeing him elsewhere at the time of the murders, no one can offer an alibi but BK. Someone being able to show where he was an hour and a half before the murders is not going to help him. Again, where are these AT&T non-existent timing records going to come from? Are they going to just materialize out of thin air. There is absolutely zero evidence that they exist. Ballance will be talked to outside of the presence of the jury, and barring some great secret revelation, the jury will never know of the talk.
I do find it surprising that you assign such low value to the Amazon click activity pertaining to the KaBar knife, being allowed, and apparently also to the information about the vehicle, in light of the video that will come in of the traffic stop, and all of the video of an identical car circling the area of KIng Rd, before stopping and leaving just when the murders were committed. I also think the defense placed high value on the demonstrative house model. They certainly put up a fuss about it, and yet, it is coming in. JMO