Unfortunately, AT (whom I despise defending because I’m terrified she’s going to somehow get BK off) doesn’t have a choice. The penalty phase immediately follows the guilt phase of the trial. That, of course, sets up the tricky issue of searching for mitigating factors for someone you
claim is factually innocent.
Look, I think something is
wrong with the brains of criminals, and whatever this is
may not be their fault.
But it doesn’t matter who or what is at fault. Violent people are dangerous and we law-abiding people must be protected from them.
Also, society won’t work if we don’t hold
adults accountable for their behavior, whatever caused it. Isn’t that the definition of being an adult?
IMO
justice demands that people who commit heinous acts like the Idaho murders must be punished severely, not only to allay the understandable thirst for vengeance of the loved ones left behind, but to create a
possible path for redemption of the perpetrator (if an ounce of humanity remains in him) and forgiveness for the family (even Steve Goncalves said he and his wife would forgive BK
after he is justly punished:
‘We will forgive him’.)
The key, IMO, is to do all we can to prevent a child from developing into a violent adult in the first place. Because after that, most are lost causes IMO.