Bbm
It seems to me that the car and bushy eyebrows were of more than “a little to no value.”
White Elantra and bushy eyebrows.
Would these two items have given probable cause for a warrant? An arrest?
Identification is made from getting a name from the car license plate, then finding the car belongs to someone with bushy eyebrows. Are you saying LE should be penalized because a sharp-eyed LEO spotted a white four-door sedan in the broader area of four brutal murders?
The lead investigator did not know about this identification until the third week in Dec according to his testimony.
The private labs invoice was dated Nov 29th (16 days into the investigation which is different than other active cases where LE compares a direct sample after all investigative leads have been followed through (sometimes years later) - before an arrest is made).
We don't know when the actual work was completed nor when the tree was created nor when MPD received their tip from the FB i (the D probably knows this timeline).
BP testified as to what he relied on to obtain the arrest and ATT warrants.
The next thing would be getting some trash or something with his DNA, to determine if he needed further investigation, since LE has DNA from the crime scene.
But this step is problematic, because BK doesn’t toss anything, odd and suspicious in itself. A red flag, if you will.
He has to toss his garbage somewhere eventually.
According to the latest documents, he was under surveillance for weeks. Where did his garbage end up if he were hoarding it? How much garbage did he generate in those weeks and where did he put it?
So while they wait on a way to do the DNA matching, LE investigates all the other avenues they can, as any investigative entity would—BK background, phone records, social media, school records, criminal records and complaints, surveillance cameras, etc.—all the things.They find more and more evidence that keeps them on BK’s trail.
Many of the subpoenas and warrants were after arrest.
Did the IGG tip cause them to query his other background information (school work, traffic stops, reddit)?
The familial line being found with IGG was by a BK relative LEGALLY uploading his/her DNA in a database and opting in for LE use. Does the database need to have permission from everyone in the up and down line of that person who uploaded his/her DNA?
Is that part of the question?
Because the IGG information is sealed, we don't know the details of how the familial line was investigated nor what databases were searched nor who opted in or out.
Maybe BK is at fault for not demanding that ALL his family members—past, present, future—refrain from using genealogy websites and databases.
Some people would say he shouldn't have to.
What about relatives he does not know about? Is not in contact with? People far removed in his family tree?
Waiting for the Ps responses to these MTS's.
JMO
