- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 29,125
- Reaction score
- 683,593
Nor the defence, I did just read a tweet saying two weapons were used,, one serrated one not, that's news to me, sorry for being a luddite I can't copy tweets over to here, and I don't know if defence or state revealed thatWe dont know everything the state has yet. jmo
I'm not expecting any bombshells from the State really, are you?what does the state have? Lets take stock shall we? They had enough evidence to get the search warrant for RA's home and vehicle from a judge and that was later upheld by a ruling from this court. They have enough to defeat not one, not two, not three, but four Franks Motions and an argument to present a SODDI defense that is NOT based in allowable evidence the defense could produce.
They have a bullet that their expert will testify was cycled through RA's weapon. They have 60 plus confessions from RA.
And that's just what we KNOW the State has. They haven't been out showing their cards or theories to the public by way of overly verbose motions that are heavy on speculation and light on facts.
As always - JMO
We don't know that for sure.He is such a tiny man. I thought that when I saw him a few months ago - it really surprised me.
But for someone in plain sight with all that was made available publicly, even a recorded voice, not one person looked his way. Not one!
The Defense should tackle the timeline rather than argue the girls were taken somewhere else and unalived elsewhere.
So it's a nothing burger, basically. Abby was in KG's car immediately before going to MHB, and was wearing a piece of her clothing against the chill at the time they were attacked.
rsbm
This is tackling the timeline, though.
As always, JMO.
Stay tuned. RA will speak and tell things only the killer would know. NMcL mentioned that in his opening statement.I doubt we ever get the whole truth in this case. I wonder if the only truth we'll ever get is that the kids were murdered and found on the back of a private property? moooo
I think both sketches do resemble RA, although one appears younger. I think it also is important to remember it’s not a photograph but a description that is then drawn by another party, with their perception of the description. I’ll admit that I hope I never have to offer info for the sketch of a person of interest. I have a hard enough time occasionally trying to match sketches shown of the actual guilty party. I’ve never seen them used during trial though. It’s an investigative tool, much like a polygraph. I think the judge was correct in dismissing them.I agree, those sketches were used for years to plead with the public to tip in anybody that resembled them, the younger sketch causes more problems for the state as I have always wondered if the first sketch was drawn post the release of bridge guy video
Nor how it's going to affect the accused. Trial I sat in we were instructed not to base a verdict upon possible sentencing.I don’t believe a juror is supposed to base his or her decision based on how it’s going to affect them personally after the trial. IMO