Good morning, folks!
I believe there will be a guilty verdict today. jmo
I believe there will be a guilty verdict today. jmo
It's after 9am now. They have likely begun their day of deliberations.Good morning, folks!
I believe there will be a guilty verdict today. jmo
One could file a complaint with the local/State bar association.What recourse does a party have against an attorney if the party believes they have been defamed? Complaint to ABA?
An attorney was disbarred. Different case, of course. Back to the case at hand.Morphew was suing the State for malicious prosecution. Not the attorneys in their individual capacities.
Right, the Defense offered up nothing in the way of good ole' Ricky character witness testimony. I believe that was intentional as they didn't want to open the door to the State to refute with negative character testimony. I bet we hear about things after the verdict.I haven't delved deeply into this case. IMO RA is guilty. However, as I was watching the Netflix documentary about the Zodiac, it got me thinking that I'm surprised that almost nothing has been revealed about Richard Allen as a person IMO. All I know is he had a stable job, he's married with a daughter, and has had depression. For "normal" people, it is so hard to understand why someone will kill someone else, especially children. It is even harder to fathom that some middle class seemingly average guy with no criminal record would do this crime out of the blue. I just think this is human nature, and even though a motive is not required it is important since our minds need a reason.
For me, I thought it was interesting that RA in his confessions mentioned he was sexually molested and he was an alcoholic. This is not a reason to kill people, but it helps my mind try to make sense of a crime that is incomprehensible to me.
My real point was after watching that documentary is I wonder what other things will come to light as the years pass.
(The documentary was around three siblings who loved and admired one of the Zodiac suspects but came to view their relationship differently after he passed.)
Chat GPT says "In Indiana, the Indiana Supreme Court oversees the licensing and discipline of attorneys. The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission is specifically responsible for investigating and prosecuting allegations of attorney misconduct, ensuring that attorneys adhere to the ethical standards required by the state's legal profession. The Commission works under the authority of the Indiana Supreme Court to maintain the integrity of the legal system and protect the public."One could file a complaint with the local/State bar association.
The American Bar Association is a voluntary association for attorneys. Membership in its ranks is not necessary to practice law and it has no disciplinary power over attorneys.
That’s a really good point.IMO
It took took longer for the killer to take those girls across the creek and up the bank than it did for the van to drive to the house.
If the killer was scared by seeing the van, it would have been really brazen to take naked girls to the creek where they could clearly be seen crossing.
Lawyer Lee discussed and reminded, last night ...the jury is not there to judge the conditions in prison, they are task with determining if RA murdered L and A.Absolutely absurd. Two things can be true at the same time. Those conditions were terrible, and Richard Allen murdered two girls.
A guilty verdict has nothing to do with endorsing this behavior. This is off the walls stupid. It’s about Allen’s guilt or innocence, not guilting jurors into finding him not guilty.
I’ll have additional updates in a few hours. For now, here’s a quick quote Brad Rozzi said toward the end of his closing argument when talking about the conditions inside of Westville —
“Rendering a verdict of guilt could be endorsing this behavior."
@WISHNews8 #RichardAllen #RichardAllenTrial